Displaying 20 results from an estimated 28 matches for "memmory".
Did you mean:
memory
2003 Oct 08
1
Memmory Bugs (PR#4474)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.
--43518230-584990211-1065637857=:31587
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I found (or rather the compiler I was using found) a few bugs in the
R-1.7.1 sources. I'm not
2009 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] Possible memory leakage in the LLVM JIT Engine
..., module provider, exectution engine and all
other structures created before
8) going to step 1 to JIT a new function
I know that the step number 7 is not really necessary. I tried to use the
same execution engine, but memory still leaks. I should note that if
interpreter is used instead of JIT no memmory leakage occurs.
Instead of posting my Haskell code, I though it would be better if I post
short C++ code that (hopefully) demonstrates the possible leakage. My
suspicion is that freeMachineCodeForFunction does not do its job properly.
Let us look at HowToUseJIT.cpp example that comes with LLVM so...
2009 Jun 08
3
[LLVMdev] Structure alignment
%FIRSTSTRU = type { i32, double, i32, i8* }
struct {
int var1;
double var2;
int var3;
char *var4;
}firstStru ;
Could someone help?
If, running a application in windows with MSVC, I allocate a memmory buffer and call a LLVM
function with such buffer, there's a structure alignment problem.
If the LLVM function call a C function using the same buffer, it runs fine.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Manoel Teixeira
2008 Nov 11
2
Server for 25-30 phones, sip trunks over the net
What cpu/memmory configurations have people had good luck with for a
small office asterisk server... (polycom's/poe linksys)
Dell's got their $200 SC440 going again until the 12th... and I'm
thinking it might be just the ticket...
2009 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] Possible memory leakage in the LLVM JIT Engine
...e
> and all other structures created before
> 8) going to step 1 to JIT a new function
>
> I know that the step number 7 is not really necessary. I tried to
> use the same execution engine, but memory still leaks. I should note
> that if interpreter is used instead of JIT no memmory leakage occurs.
>
> Instead of posting my Haskell code, I though it would be better if I
> post short C++ code that (hopefully) demonstrates the possible
> leakage. My suspicion is that freeMachineCodeForFunction does not do
> its job properly.
>
> Let us look at HowToUse...
2004 Jun 18
1
Initializing SparseM matrix matrix.csc
...atrix.csc (Pacakge SparseM) with all elements 0
and afterwards set a few alements nonzero.
The matrix which I like to allocate is so huge that I can not use
A <- matrix(a,n1,p)
before:
A.csr <- as.matrix.csc(A)
because I can not allocate such a huge matrix A.
But I believe that the much more memmory efficient model in case of csc matrix should do it for a sparse matrix.
How to do this.
Sincerely Eryk
2007 Apr 06
1
The best way to protect against starvation?
...runs:
-- snip --
cat > starv.c <<EOF
main(){ char *point; while(1) { point = ( char * ) malloc(10000); }}
EOF
cc starv.c
while true
do
./a.out &
done
-- snip --
This will fast starv the operating system (FreeBSD 6.2). I have tried to
limit the number of processes and the amount of memmory consumed (in
login.conf).
There is also a file /etc/malloc.conf - but I don't understand if this
could help? Any advice?
--
G?ran Hasse
----------------------------------------------------------------
G?ran Hasse email: gh@raditex.se Tel: 08-6949270
Raditex AB ht...
2007 Apr 18
1
Monitor application inestability and high load
...ersions prior to 1.2.7. The asterisk logs don't show any particular message in verbose level 3. Apart from the recording, I have a high use of Manager and the mysql is used for some bussines logic but I think that nothing to high load, indeed mysql never is the most important part in processor, memmory and disk access statistics.
In http://linuxuanl.org/eald/random/ps.txt there is an example (no very espectacular but is more or less what happens) of the status of the computer with problems. I see that there are many sh without their soxmix or rm; Usually this is done faster indeed I changed soxm...
2020 Oct 29
2
[External] Something is wrong with the unserialize function
...devel on behalf of luke-tierney at uiowa.edu" <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote:
Thanks for the report. Will look into it when I get a chance unless
someone else gets there first.
A simpler reprex:
## create and serialize a memmory-mapped file object
filePath <- "x.dat"
con <- file(filePath, "wrb")
writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con)
close(con)
library(simplemmap)
x <- mmap(filePath, "double")
saveRDS(x, file = "x.Rds")
## in a separate R process:
gc...
2010 Feb 05
3
Asterisk going down
...ow Reachable. (1ms
/ 2000ms)
[Feb 5 14:09:53] NOTICE[6536] chan_sip.c: Peer '328' is now Reachable. (1ms
/ 2000ms)
I could not make any call, neither internall nor to the pstn, what could be
happening here my friends? what should i check in the Asterisk server? is
this a network problem? memmory or cpu problems?
Thanks in advance for your help
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100205/efb9bca8/attachment.htm
2005 Dec 14
5
oom-killer.
...oom-killer call.
Finally inspected the syslog and realize the oom-killer was called to leave the
system stable having killed firefox-bin, 3 x rosetta, xmms and one nautilus.
It's a PIII 800 Mhz, 40GB IDE, 512 Mb RAM, 1024 Swap space, up for 4 days.
I'm not very xperienced in tunning the memmory system nor the swap system, help
appreciated to avoid this memory 'trashing' situtation (14 virtual desktops
openned at the same time).
Is it a normal situation? Is it a correct protecction measure? It's due a low
bandwitch IDE HD? how can i tune it to avoid this situations? is it a hi...
2020 Oct 29
2
Something is wrong with the unserialize function
Hi all,
I am not able to export an ALTREP object when `gctorture` is on in the
worker. The package simplemmap can be used to reproduce the problem. See
the example below
```
## Create a temporary file
filePath <- tempfile()
con <- file(filePath, "wrb")
writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con)
close(con)
library(simplemmap)
library(parallel)
cl <- makeCluster(1)
x <- mmap(filePath,
2016 Jul 28
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 repost 4/7] virtio-balloon: speed up inflate/deflate process
...I don't really believe
people would want to pay for it.
> 1MB is a very small portion for a VM with more than 32GB memory and it's the *worst case*,
> for VM with less than 32GB memory, the amount of RAM depends on VM's memory size
> and will be less than 1MB.
It's guest memmory so might all be in swap and never touched,
your memset at probe time will fault it in and make hypervisor
actually pay for it.
> If 1MB is too big, how about 512K, or 256K? 32K seems too small.
>
> Liang
It's only small because it makes you rescan the free list.
So maybe you should...
2016 Jul 28
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 repost 4/7] virtio-balloon: speed up inflate/deflate process
...I don't really believe
people would want to pay for it.
> 1MB is a very small portion for a VM with more than 32GB memory and it's the *worst case*,
> for VM with less than 32GB memory, the amount of RAM depends on VM's memory size
> and will be less than 1MB.
It's guest memmory so might all be in swap and never touched,
your memset at probe time will fault it in and make hypervisor
actually pay for it.
> If 1MB is too big, how about 512K, or 256K? 32K seems too small.
>
> Liang
It's only small because it makes you rescan the free list.
So maybe you should...
2009 Jun 09
1
[LLVMdev] Structure alignment
...> struct ?{
> ? ? ? ?int ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? var1;
> ? ? ? ?double ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?var2;
> ? ? ? ?int ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? var3;
> ? ? ? ?char ? ?*var4;
> }firstStru ;
>
> Could someone help?
> If, running a application in windows with MSVC, ?I allocate a memmory buffer and call a LLVM
> function with such buffer, there's a structure alignment problem.
> If the LLVM function call a C function using the same buffer, it runs fine.
> Any ideas?
You're probably passing in the wrong string to the TargetData; try
something like the following:
ta...
2020 Oct 29
0
[External] Something is wrong with the unserialize function
Thanks for the report. Will look into it when I get a chance unless
someone else gets there first.
A simpler reprex:
## create and serialize a memmory-mapped file object
filePath <- "x.dat"
con <- file(filePath, "wrb")
writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con)
close(con)
library(simplemmap)
x <- mmap(filePath, "double")
saveRDS(x, file = "x.Rds")
## in a separate R process:
gctorture()
readRDS("x.Rds")...
2004 Apr 09
5
question
Hi,
I have found a strange thing. If I copy and paste the R source file, then
the result is okay with. However, if I use R GUI (File icon and Source
File),
then the result is different. Please let me know possible reasons.
Many thanks in advance.
Best
Ja-Yong
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Jan 16
6
Highload project on RoR
I need advice about What is the best practice to scale RoR project ?
My current stack is:
- Ruby 1.9.3
- RoR 3.2.8
- Redis DB for caching and some hot data
- PostgreSQL
- Resque for background jobs
I am expecting a highload for my project for several month. And I need to
change my architecture.
Primarily, I want to change my backend architecture. I read about highload
2020 Oct 29
0
[External] Something is wrong with the unserialize function
...ney at uiowa.edu" <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report. Will look into it when I get a chance unless
> someone else gets there first.
>
> A simpler reprex:
>
> ## create and serialize a memmory-mapped file object
> filePath <- "x.dat"
> con <- file(filePath, "wrb")
> writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con)
> close(con)
>
> library(simplemmap)
> x <- mmap(filePath, "double")
> saveRDS(x, file = "x.Rds")
>
&g...
2019 Jun 11
3
@llvm.memcpy not honoring volatile?
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet at google.com> wrote:
>
> I spent some time reading the C standard <https://web.archive.org/web/20181230041359if_/http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/abq/c17_updated_proposed_fdis.pdf>:
>
> 5.1.2.3 Program execution
> 2. Accessing a volatile object, modifying an object, modifying a file, or calling