search for: mem_device

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "mem_device".

Did you mean: mei_device
2013 Feb 15
1
xen/acpi: ACPI memory hotplug
...8 * Now add the notified device. This creates the acpi_device 189 * and invokes .add function 190 */ 191 result = acpi_bus_scan(handle); 192 if (result) { 193 pr_warn(PREFIX "Cannot add acpi bus\n"); 194 return -EINVAL; 195 } 196 197 end: 198 *mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device); ^^^^^^ Dereference. 199 if (!(*mem_device)) { 200 pr_err(PREFIX "Driver data not found\n"); regards, dan carpenter
2013 Feb 15
1
xen/acpi: ACPI memory hotplug
...8 * Now add the notified device. This creates the acpi_device 189 * and invokes .add function 190 */ 191 result = acpi_bus_scan(handle); 192 if (result) { 193 pr_warn(PREFIX "Cannot add acpi bus\n"); 194 return -EINVAL; 195 } 196 197 end: 198 *mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device); ^^^^^^ Dereference. 199 if (!(*mem_device)) { 200 pr_err(PREFIX "Driver data not found\n"); regards, dan carpenter
2020 Sep 08
0
[PATCH v2 3/7] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends
...ex(lmb); return rc; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c index e294f44a78504..d91b3584d4b2b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device) if (node < 0) node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr); - result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length); + result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length, 0); /* * If the memory block has been used by the kernel, add_memory...
2020 Sep 10
0
[PATCH v3 3/7] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends
...ex(lmb); return rc; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c index e294f44a78504..2067c3bc55763 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device) if (node < 0) node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr); - result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length); + result = __add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length, + MHP_NONE); /* * If the memory block has been used by the...
2020 Apr 30
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Allow to not create firmware memmap entries
This is the follow up of [1]: [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Make virtio-mem play nicely with kexec-tools I realized that this is not only helpful for virtio-mem, but also for dax/kmem - it's a fix for that use case (see patch #3) of persistent memory. Also, while testing, I discovered that kexec-tools will *not* add dax/kmem memory (anything not directly under the root when parsing
2020 Sep 08
14
[PATCH v2 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 08
14
[PATCH v2 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Apr 29
4
[PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Make virtio-mem play nicely with kexec-tools
This series is based on [1]: [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory That will hopefull get picked up soon, rebased to -next. The following patches were reverted from -next [2]: [PATCH 0/3] kexec/memory_hotplug: Prevent removal and accidental use As discussed in that thread, they should be reverted from -next already. In theory, if people agree, we could take the first two patches
2020 Sep 10
9
[PATCH v3 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 11
13
[PATCH v4 0/8] selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 11
13
[PATCH v4 0/8] selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where