search for: mei_device

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "mei_device".

Did you mean: ei_device
2023 Jul 13
2
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...dev *dev 762 struct input_dev *dev 623 struct usbnet *dev 561 struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev 525 struct mt76_dev *dev 465 struct mt76x02_dev *dev 435 struct platform_device *dev 431 struct usb_device *dev 411 struct mt7915_dev *dev 398 struct cx231xx *dev 378 struct mei_device *dev 363 struct ksz_device *dev 359 struct mthca_dev *dev A good portion of the above also have a dev member. Are you planning on changing all of the above too, or are you only annoyed by drm? I'm really not convinced at all. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics...
2023 Jul 13
2
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...dev *dev 762 struct input_dev *dev 623 struct usbnet *dev 561 struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev 525 struct mt76_dev *dev 465 struct mt76x02_dev *dev 435 struct platform_device *dev 431 struct usb_device *dev 411 struct mt7915_dev *dev 398 struct cx231xx *dev 378 struct mei_device *dev 363 struct ksz_device *dev 359 struct mthca_dev *dev A good portion of the above also have a dev member. Are you planning on changing all of the above too, or are you only annoyed by drm? I'm really not convinced at all. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics...
2023 Jul 12
4
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello, > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. > > I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to
2023 Jul 12
4
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello, > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. > > I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
...k; case MPI_CONTEXT_REPLY_TYPE_SCSI_TARGET: cb_idx = mpt_get_cb_idx(MPTSTM_DRIVER); diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c index a97eb5d47705..686e8b6a4c55 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c @@ -1375,11 +1375,10 @@ int mei_hbm_dispatch(struct mei_device *dev, struct mei_msg_hdr *hdr) dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_POWER_DOWN; dev_info(dev->dev, "hbm: stop response: resetting.\n"); /* force the reset */ return -EPROTO; - break; case CLIENT_DISCONNECT_REQ_CMD: dev_dbg(dev->dev, "hbm: disconnect request: messag...
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
...k; case MPI_CONTEXT_REPLY_TYPE_SCSI_TARGET: cb_idx = mpt_get_cb_idx(MPTSTM_DRIVER); diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c index a97eb5d47705..686e8b6a4c55 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c @@ -1375,11 +1375,10 @@ int mei_hbm_dispatch(struct mei_device *dev, struct mei_msg_hdr *hdr) dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_POWER_DOWN; dev_info(dev->dev, "hbm: stop response: resetting.\n"); /* force the reset */ return -EPROTO; - break; case CLIENT_DISCONNECT_REQ_CMD: dev_dbg(dev->dev, "hbm: disconnect request: messag...