search for: meati

"Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: >> "Unfortunately, that does appear to be the case. I think MSVC 2010 is >> a reasonable requirement, but it seems like 2012 is the real target >> for C++11 features." IMO, the only meaty C++11 feature that VS2012 adds over VS2010 is range-based for-loops. > Bah, they can install Mingw binaries.

Hi, I''m looking into write scaffold generators that will, amoung other things, scaffold active record associations (eg. generate select boxes for belongs_to where you can choose a parent object) for quicker prototyping. But... My question is: Is there anyway of finding out what associations exist from examining the lodel classes themselves or indeed any other way of finding out this

"Unfortunately, that does appear to be the case. I think MSVC 2010 is a reasonable requirement, but it seems like 2012 is the real target for C++11 features." Bah, they can install Mingw binaries. Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130110/eb78b89f/attachment.html>

I have a custom fact. It syncs correctly, works correctly everywhere when run via ''facter'', and works correctly from puppet on all but one machine. >From ''facter'': # export FACTERLIB=/var/puppet/facts # /opt/puppet/bin/facter itg_location mel But from within puppetd I get: Sep 13 14:54:29 hordac puppetd[768]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning] Could not load fa

Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty Asterisk box after doing our initial testing and playing on a 1ghz system. Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which I normally don't do but thought it seemed like a good deal. I have included the initial specs below, I will be adding another 1 GB of RAM for a total of 2 GB. My first question is regarding the serial ATA drives... I

> I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request > tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor > it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be > buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can > be hard to tell if a code owner has noticed the patch because it is a

On 30-Apr-09, at 6:38 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:02 PM, David Greene wrote: >> As I've been going along I've added feature flags for SSE4a and >> SSE5. These >> really do need to be separate feature flags because having SSE4a and/ >> or SSE5 >> does not imply that you have SSE4.2 or SSE4.1. So they can't be >> part of the

I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can be hard to tell if a code owner has noticed the patch because it is a very high-volume list.

CISCO?s IronPort group is looking for a topnotch Software/Hardware Quality Assurance Engineer with expertise in FreeBSD. Please contact me if you are interested. Regards, Brent breroger@cisco.com Software/Hardware Quality Assurance Engineer Location ? San Bruno, California Description: Department Overview: Cisco IronPort, a part of Cisco?s Security Technologies Business Unit (STBU), email

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request >> tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor >> it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be >> buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can >> be

the ford cd is backwards --- wine-users-request@winehq.org wrote: > Send wine-users mailing list submissions to > wine-users@winehq.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide > Web, visit > > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or > body 'help' to > wine-users-request@winehq.org >

I'm attempting to do a first-time Asterisk install at home, firstly for use by my self and my family, and secondly as a learning experience. I've got a new house, and the previous owners removed all but one (1) phone jack. So I figured I might as well build a PBX. Functional goals include station-to-station calling, rudimentary auto attendant/voice mail, and perhaps tieing into the

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> As a simplification, the compiler deals almost exclusively in pseudo >> instructions. By x86 analogy, using pseudos to unfold a TEST32rm into >> MOV32rm + TEST32rr means I can skip the complex operand fitting effort >> needed to pick specific machine instructions. There are many

Beta 2 is now available for testing. Problems Corrected since Beta 1: 1) References to the obsolete USE_ACTIONS option have been removed from the manpages. 2) NFLOG has been documented for some time as a valid ACTION in the rules files but support for that action was never implemented until this release. 3) The Checksum Target capability detection in the rules compiler was

Beta 2 is now available for testing. Problems Corrected since Beta 1: 1) References to the obsolete USE_ACTIONS option have been removed from the manpages. 2) NFLOG has been documented for some time as a valid ACTION in the rules files but support for that action was never implemented until this release. 3) The Checksum Target capability detection in the rules compiler was

This just an FYI. Yesterday I updated to top of trunk wine and rebuilt and installed. I have a Ford Service CD (for 1999 models) and wine on the exe does not work (on an old Windows ME laptop it all works). The startup.exe sort of seems to work AFAICT, but when it's done and the app exe started the app exe ( installed on disk) cannot seem to find the cd (the app needs the CD, the install

David A. Green wrote: > I find llvm-commits daunting. So much that I hesitate to do reviews. > As Chris commented, I am not very active on that list. There's a reason > for that beyond lack of time. So the goal is to make it easier for a member of the community to review only commits to a sub-tree that interests them? Let's say it may or may not be easier for reviewers to

Hi, I bougth the Agile Web Development with rails First Edition and now want buy rails recipes but what is the best decision buy rails recipes or the new edition de Agile Web Development With Rails? Jean Carlo Schechnner www.idvirtual.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> - I have to *remember* I submitted the patch (not hard, but it is a >> cost). > > If you forgot, the chances are high that the patch was unimportant. I > do my development on local git branches, so every time I do `git > branch`, I'm reminded. There's really no overhead. Every time you have to check it's