search for: meaninglessly

Hi there, I just installed the package under windows, and it works very well. However, as I tried to install it on a cluster which uses linux OS, "Linux lionxc.aset.psu.edu 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux" I always failed. The message during the installation process is as follows: > install.packages("geepack") Warning

On a dry run, rsync displays a speedup value calculated from the total size of the source file data and the amount of data sent over the connection, but this value is meaningless and grossly misleading because the file data is not sent over the connection. Example: [matt@mattlaptop2 test]$ rsync -avi -n ~/eclipse/releases/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz . sending incremental file list

Hello, I was implementing the llvm_any_type in my intrinsic def int_csa_xxx : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], [llvm_i32_ty]>; as the following in its corresponding builtins in Builtins.def: BUILTIN(__builtin_xxx, "v.", "nt") the "t" was sufficient here to not perform any type checking. The type checking was handled in CGBuiltin.cpp. This was working until

I try to use the routine cutree to cut a tree (created by hclust) into several groups by specifiing the hight of the cut. a<-1:10 cutree(tree, h=a*100) The Matrix with group meberships returned is ok for most of the hights, but in some cases (as for example h=800 and h=900) the results don't make sense (group membership=0 or 58965231, it looks like the range of data allowed by the data

There are quite a few compilation warnings from rsync-2.5.5rc1 that could be eliminated by code cleanup. gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c main.c -o main.o main.c: In function `start_client': main.c:665: warning: unused variable `write_batch' main.c:664: warning: unused variable `whole_file' These warnings will go away when the two variables are properly bracketed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to calculate Pearson correlation coefficients for a large matrix of size 18563 x 18563. The following function takes about XX minutes to complete, and I'd like to do this calculation about 15 times and so speed is some what of an issue. Does anyone have any suggestions on ways to speed this up? I'd wondered if using C++ code to

On 2020/6/11 ??7:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > static void vhost_vq_free_iovecs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > { > kfree(vq->descs); > @@ -394,6 +400,9 @@ static long vhost_dev_alloc_iovecs(struct vhost_dev *dev) > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) { > vq = dev->vqs[i]; > vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit; > + if

On 2020/6/11 ??7:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > static void vhost_vq_free_iovecs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > { > kfree(vq->descs); > @@ -394,6 +400,9 @@ static long vhost_dev_alloc_iovecs(struct vhost_dev *dev) > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) { > vq = dev->vqs[i]; > vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit; > + if

On 04/18/2016 01:18 PM, g wrote: > 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and there > are a lot. > > 'grep deleted' will list_only_ the deleted files that are still open. That's exactly the same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? I know. I'm frustrated

I know this is probably a meaningless metric, but I''m new to TDD and would like to know what to expect in terms of lines of code of tests to lines of code in a "typical" rails app. It seems like it could be as much as 5:1 or more. Perhaps its more like number of test methods : lines of code is closer to 1:1 ?

Seems like a new change in LLVM has made it so that bitcast of bitcast i8* %1 to %Foo* meaningless? If I'm correct is there any need for the bitcast anymore? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150417/e5bfbc64/attachment.html>

There is a warning in the documentation for ?factor (R version 2.3.0) as follows: " The interpretation of a factor depends on both the codes and the '"levels"' attribute. Be careful only to compare factors with the same set of levels (in the same order). In particular, 'as.numeric' applied to a factor is meaningless, and may happen by implicit coercion.

> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. > > In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. It is a nice short domain name though :)

Hi, Horde seems to be quite the problem child. It sorta kinda looks like session handling is entirely broken. kronolith will let me in, but not for long. Then I get "invalid token" and am bounced back to the home screen. imp won't let me in at all. This behavior is completely broken: I get a log in screen and a message in /var/log/messages about not being authorized for IMP (which

Hi Tomas, On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > they provide an over-approximation They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the least) e.g. on reference objects where the entire substance of the object is ignored which makes object.size() completely meaningless in that case: setRefClass("A", fields=c(stuff="ANY"))

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > I'm very unclear and why you think a generic black box intrinsic will have > any different performance impact ;-) > > > I'm also unclear on what the goal with this intrinsic is. > I understand the symptoms you are trying to solve - what exactly is the > disease. > > IE you say

In ggplot2, I would like to make a boxplot that has the following properties: (1) Contrary to default, the meaningful axis should be the horizontal axis. Lattice does this, for instance, by library(lattice);bwplot(~mtcars$mpg) (2) It is *univariate*, i.e., of a single vector, say mtcars$mpg. I do not wish to make separate plots for the different values of mtcars$cyl. (3) Nothing on the

I decided, after the last discussion of smartd and S.M.A.R.T. disks, to take a look in my /var/log/messages, and I'm seeing fair bit of this: Sep 10 20:11:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Offline uncorrectable sectors Sep 10 20:41:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/hdb, 21 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Sep 10 20:41:24 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device:

Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed under // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for // details. The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally meaningless as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and 'ownership' changes. The current

Hi, Thanks Volodya, Misha and Chris, > > For example, > > Correct way: > > Instruction *NewInst = new LoadInst(...); > > NewBB->getInstList().push_back(NewInst); > > > > what I need just put some junk data in the BB, not instructions. From > > assemble code level, it looks like the following, > > > > a piece of code from