search for: meaningless

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1047 matches for "meaningless".

2010 May 20
0
Installation problem with "geepack"
.../inst/include -I/usr/local/include -mp -fpic -g -O2 -c famstr.cc -o famstr.o icpc: command line remark #10010: option '-mp' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. See '-help deprecated' ../inst/include/tnt/vec.h(152): warning #858: type qualifier on return type is meaningless const iterator begin() const { return v_;} ^ ../inst/include/tnt/vec.h(153): warning #858: type qualifier on return type is meaningless const iterator end() const { return v_ + n_; } ^ icpc -I/usr/global/R/2.11.0/lib64/R/include -I../inst/include -I/usr/local/include -mp...
2007 Nov 05
1
Rsync shouldn't display a meaningless speedup on a dry run
On a dry run, rsync displays a speedup value calculated from the total size of the source file data and the amount of data sent over the connection, but this value is meaningless and grossly misleading because the file data is not sent over the connection. Example: [matt@mattlaptop2 test]$ rsync -avi -n ~/eclipse/releases/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz . sending incremental file list >f+++++++++ eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz sent 74 bytes received 15 bytes 178....
2018 Dec 31
1
Issue with "t -> signature is meaningless, use custom typechecking"
Hello, I was implementing the llvm_any_type in my intrinsic def int_csa_xxx : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], [llvm_i32_ty]>; as the following in its corresponding builtins in Builtins.def: BUILTIN(__builtin_xxx, "v.", "nt") the "t" was sufficient here to not perform any type checking. The type checking was handled in CGBuiltin.cpp. This was working until
2002 Jan 22
1
cutree using a vector for h giving meaningless results
I try to use the routine cutree to cut a tree (created by hclust) into several groups by specifiing the hight of the cut. a<-1:10 cutree(tree, h=a*100) The Matrix with group meberships returned is ok for most of the hights, but in some cases (as for example h=800 and h=900) the results don't make sense (group membership=0 or 58965231, it looks like the range of data allowed by the data
2002 Mar 28
1
(no subject)
...ed int arg (arg 2) The SGI IRIX 6.5 C compiler, which is noted for its excellent diagnostics, had these additional comments: c89 -mips3 -O2 -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c options.c -o options.o cc-3303 c89: WARNING File = ./popt/popt.h, Line = 117 A type qualifier on a return type is meaningless. /*@observer@*/ const char *const poptStrerror(const int error); c89 -mips3 -O2 -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c lib/getaddrinfo.c -o lib/getaddrinfo.o cc-1174 c89: WARNING File = lib/getaddrinfo.c, Line = 67 The variable "in6_addrany" was declared but never referenced....
2008 Dec 15
1
Pearson Correlation Speed
...look for C libraries) 3) Tried: "R CMD SHLIB correlation.cpp" and got the following as output: - -- start output -- icpc -I/tools/R/2.7.1/lib/R/include -I/usr/local/include -mp -fpic - -g -O2 -c correlation.cpp -o correlation.o ap.h(163): warning #858: type qualifier on return type is meaningless const bool operator==(const complex& lhs, const complex& rhs); ^ ap.h(164): warning #858: type qualifier on return type is meaningless const bool operator!=(const complex& lhs, const complex& rhs); ^ ap.h(179): warning #858: type qualifier on return t...
2020 Jun 17
4
[PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
...t_dev *dev) > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) { > vq = dev->vqs[i]; > vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit; > + if (vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq) < 0) { > + return -EINVAL; > + } This check breaks vdpa which set iov_limit to zero. Consider iov_limit is meaningless to vDPA, I wonder we can skip the test when device doesn't use worker. Thanks
2020 Jun 17
4
[PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
...t_dev *dev) > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) { > vq = dev->vqs[i]; > vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit; > + if (vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq) < 0) { > + return -EINVAL; > + } This check breaks vdpa which set iov_limit to zero. Consider iov_limit is meaningless to vDPA, I wonder we can skip the test when device doesn't use worker. Thanks
2016 Apr 18
4
Suddenly increased my hard disk
...same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? I know. I'm frustrated today. I spent the weekend dealing with people nit-picking. It's hard to exaggerate how much time and energy can be wasted by people insisting on meaningless changes.
2007 May 23
2
lines of code
I know this is probably a meaningless metric, but I''m new to TDD and would like to know what to expect in terms of lines of code of tests to lines of code in a "typical" rails app. It seems like it could be as much as 5:1 or more. Perhaps its more like number of test methods : lines of code is closer to 1:1...
2015 Apr 17
3
[LLVMdev] Is bitcast now needed in LLVM?
Seems like a new change in LLVM has made it so that bitcast of bitcast i8* %1 to %Foo* meaningless? If I'm correct is there any need for the bitcast anymore? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150417/e5bfbc64/attachment.html>
2007 Feb 27
2
factor documentation issue
...ctor (R version 2.3.0) as follows: " The interpretation of a factor depends on both the codes and the '"levels"' attribute. Be careful only to compare factors with the same set of levels (in the same order). In particular, 'as.numeric' applied to a factor is meaningless, and may happen by implicit coercion. To "revert" a factor 'f' to its original numeric values, 'as.numeric(levels(f))[f]' is recommended and slightly more efficient than 'as.numeric(as.character(f))'. But as.numeric seems to work fine whereas as.numeric(le...
2011 Dec 22
4
[LLVMdev] The name of LLVM
> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. > > In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. It is a nice short domain name though :) Just to make sure. Do you mean "Low Level Virtual Machine" is gone and LLVM is not an acronym for "Low Level Virtual Machine&qu...
2014 Mar 24
5
has anybody gotten horde working?
.... Then I get "invalid token" and am bounced back to the home screen. imp won't let me in at all. This behavior is completely broken: I get a log in screen and a message in /var/log/messages about not being authorized for IMP (which is apparently right up there in the list of useless, meaningless error messages). Looking around on the web, I see a google thread about somebody saying kronolith shouldn't reset session data, and Jan Schneider, the horde developer, I think, insisting that it must. He seems to have his own idea about how things should work--and I'm beginning to wonder i...
2020 Mar 27
4
object.size vs lobstr::obj_size
Hi Tomas, On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > they provide an over-approximation They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the least) e.g. on reference objects where the entire substance of the object is ignored which makes object.size() completely meaningless in that case: setRefClass("A", fields=c(stuff="ANY")) object.size(new("A", stuff=raw(0))) # 680 bytes object.size(new("A", stuff=runif(1e8))) # 680 bytes Why wouldn't object.size() look at the content of environments? Thanks, H. -- Her...
2015 Nov 03
2
[RFC] A new intrinsic, `llvm.blackbox`, to explicitly prevent constprop, die, etc optimizations
...timizations > from deleting IR due to constant propagation, dead code elimination, etc." > > But why are you trying to achieve this goal? > It's a cleaner design than current solutions (as far as I'm aware). > Benchmarks that can be const prop'd/etc away are often meaningless. > A benchmark that's completely removed is even more meaningless, and the developer may not even know it's happening. I'm not saying this intrinsic will make all benchmarks meaningful (and I can't), I'm saying that it would be useful in Rust in ensuring that tests/benches a...
2010 Jun 18
1
ggplot2 boxplot: horizontal, univariate
...default, the meaningful axis should be the horizontal axis. Lattice does this, for instance, by library(lattice);bwplot(~mtcars$mpg) (2) It is *univariate*, i.e., of a single vector, say mtcars$mpg. I do not wish to make separate plots for the different values of mtcars$cyl. (3) Nothing on the meaningless axis--the axis that does not correspond to values of mtcars$mpg, the axis which by default is horizontal--should suggest a scale. Thus, there should be no axis title or label; there should be no axis ticks. Partial solutions: To achieve (1), one might save a vertical plot (with mpg on the y-axis)...
2008 Sep 11
3
Alarming (?) smartd reports
...4294967295 is FFFFFFFF in hex, and I'm running a 64-bit machine. Google is not particularly informative on this subject - anyone know more than general suggestions about dd, badblocks, etc.? This is my boot and primary system disk (has been for some time), but the error message is essentially meaningless (to me, right now). Thanks. mhr PS: In the last couple of months there was a discussion of how to make the disk less active, starting with someone reporting that their disk drive activity light blinked every 30 seconds or something like that. I tried to find it again, but I couldn't pin down...
2007 Dec 14
7
[LLVMdev] this file was developed by ...
Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed under // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for // details. The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally meaningless as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who creates the file touches it. Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source /...
2005 May 11
2
[LLVMdev] Re:RE: Question about inserting instructions
...x sbyte]* %str1, int 0, int 3 ; <sbyte*> [#uses=1] store sbyte 116, sbyte* %tmp.3 will be assembled to movb $116, 18(%esp) movb $101, 19(%esp) movb $115, 20(%esp) movb $116, 21(%esp) But for me, in dummy BB, we'd like to put some meaningless code or illegal code. From assemble machine level, it looks like push %eax push %ecx pop %edx pusha safh cltd das clc all of them are legal one-byte x86 machine instruc...