search for: mdbooth

--- lib/hivex.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/hivex.c b/lib/hivex.c index 13d7556..8a774de 100644 --- a/lib/hivex.c +++ b/lib/hivex.c @@ -543,6 +543,9 @@ hivex_close (hive_h *h) free (h->filename); free (h); + if (h->msglvl >= 1) + fprintf (stderr, "hivex_close\n"); + return r; } -- 1.7.2.1

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:10:35AM -0800, mdbooth wrote: > Remove generated file from source control, and don't barf when it doesn't exist > while bootstrapping. > > You can merge this Pull Request by running: > > git pull https://github.com/mdbooth/libguestfs build > > Or you can view, comment on it, or merge...

Hi, I have recently been looking into virt-v2v, and noticed the mention of an upcoming rewrite in a few places. Is there a roadmap or post someplace that describes the future of this project? I've got a couple of patches against the current code base, and am wondering if they will still be considered for inclusion. Thanks, Mike

Here is an update to the patch posted yesterday. The changes are: (1) Don't use inline (for mdbooth). (2) Added a comment to HACKING (for mdbooth). (3) Check for old-style and new-style glibc functions and use whatever is available (for danpb). (4) Removed the old shell_quote function instead of just commenting it out. Can anyone decode from Uli's message[1] whether these new functions ar...

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:29:49AM -0600, Mike Latimer wrote: > Hi, I'll make some advisory comments, but you really need to talk to Matt Booth (CC'd - or mdbooth on #libguestfs). > I have recently been looking into virt-v2v, and noticed the mention > of an upcoming rewrite in a few places. Is there a roadmap or post > someplace that describes the future of this project? Even better, there is a repo: https://github.com/mdbooth/guestconv Matt - can...

On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 07:52:08 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Even better, there is a repo: https://github.com/mdbooth/guestconv Excellent. Thanks for the pointer. > Matt - can you push your latest commits, or is there a more canonical > repo that Mike can look at? The last changes in the repo seem to be from back in June. Is guestconv expected to completely replace virt-v2v in RHEL7? > > I've...

--- v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/virt-v2v.pod b/v2v/virt-v2v.pod index 4c7204b..ba91851 100644 --- a/v2v/virt-v2v.pod +++ b/v2v/virt-v2v.pod @@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ And hence L<virsh(1)>, L<virt-manager(1)>, and similar tools. =item OpenSUSE 10 and up +=item Debian 6 and up + +=item Ubuntu 10.04, 12.04, 14.04, 16.04,

...This module handles: * * - RHEL and derivatives like CentOS and ScientificLinux * - SUSE - * - OpenSUSE and Fedora (not enterprisey, but similar enough to RHEL/SUSE) + * - OpenSUSE and Fedora (similar enough to RHEL/SUSE) + * - Debian and derivatives like Ubuntu and Linux Mint *) (* < mdbooth> It's all in there for a reason :/ *) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ let rec convert (g : G.guestfs) inspect source output rcaps = * the common v2v.ml code, but that has to deal with generic guests * (anything common to Linux and Windows). Here we do more detailed * inspection which can make...

...t; > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890478 > > In addition, I saw your commitment in August in the following project, which > fixes an important bug. I hope to release the latest code of libldm, which will > also help many people use it. > > https://github.com/mdbooth/libldm > > Finally, thank you again for your previous help and dedication to the open > source community. I guess we can do a new release. No objections Matt? Also I'm not sure where if anywhere we are hosting tarballs. Maybe we are relying on github's automatic tarball featur...

...;> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890478 >> In addition, I saw your commitment in August in the following project, which >> fixes an important bug. I hope to release the latest code of libldm, which will >> also help many people use it. >> https://github.com/mdbooth/libldm >> Finally, thank you again for your previous help and dedication to the open >> source community. > > I guess we can do a new release. No objections Matt? > > Also I'm not sure where if anywhere we are hosting tarballs. Maybe we > are relying on github'...

I've added internationalisation to guestconv, and updated HACKING with a new section. Any thoughts/comments? Matt

On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:10 -0600, Mike Latimer wrote: > On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 07:52:08 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Even better, there is a repo: https://github.com/mdbooth/guestconv > > Excellent. Thanks for the pointer. > > > Matt - can you push your latest commits, or is there a more canonical > > repo that Mike can look at? > > The last changes in the repo seem to be from back in June. Is guestconv > expected to completely replace...