search for: mcdowellh

...wxrwxrwx 24,839,552 2016/05/27 14:00:57 BWAG_R2_00130798.dpx I¹m running version 3.1.2 protocol 31. Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 7:26 PM, "rsync on behalf of Steven Levine" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on behalf of steve53 at earthlink.net> wrote: >In <D3762D63.17A7%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/02/16 > at 10:42 PM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: > >Hi Blake, > >>The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can t imagine >>why it wouldn t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn t >>...

Cool Thanks! Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc” The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why it wouldn’t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn’t exist for every file, just the vast majority. So, that just makes it more confusing. Yes,

In <D3762D63.17A7%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/02/16 at 10:42 PM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: Hi Blake, >The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can t imagine >why it wouldn t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn t >exist for every file, just t...

In <D37E24FA.120D%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/09/16 at 12:17 AM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: Hi Blake, Please reply to the list. >rsync -nri --modify-window=1 <src> <dest> As others mentioned, you need need to use --times. This is needed so that we can see use output...

....dpx > > I¹m running version 3.1.2 protocol 31. > > > Thanks, > Blake > > > On 6/2/16, 7:26 PM, "rsync on behalf of Steven Levine" > <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on behalf of steve53 at earthlink.net> wrote: > >> In <D3762D63.17A7%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/02/16 >> at 10:42 PM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: >> >> Hi Blake, >> >>> The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can t imagine >>> why it wouldn t handle timestamps. Also of note - th...

"McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> wrote: > The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. Ah, is this the version of rsync that comes with OS X ? Are these HFS+ filesystems ? I vaguely recall that the OS X version is "hacked" to handle the file semantics of HFS+ filesystems. Hopefully someone e...

Thanks Paul. That should help! Kevin, For a local copy is running a plain rsync transfer ( rsync <src> <dest> ) essentially the same as a "drag-and-drop"? The benefits of using rsync in that situation would all come from choosing flags appropriate to the desired transfer? Thanks, Blake -----Original Message----- From: rsync [mailto:rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org] On

Hello, We have our mac connected to a SAN via 10Gbe fiber network. Being thunderbolt model macs with no PCI slots we are using external boxes (Sonnet, ATTO) to interface between the thunderbolt and fiber connections. When using rsync -avvPhi we get speeds of approx 110MB/s but with a simple drag-and-drop we get speeds of approx 620MB/s. BIG difference. We get the same speeds (roughly)

How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, At my work we use rsync to move files between drives and to LTO among other things. I'm having an issue using rsync to move material between and external drive and an internal drive. We run "rsync -avvPh <src> <dest>" and most of the files keep writing every time I run this. It appears that the modification times are not being carried through to the destination

Hello, I’m running rsync -avPhi to move large video files to a remote server. Often we have to stop a transfer midway through to push something else to the server. My hope was that the -P flag would invoke --partial and the transfer would pick-up where it left off. This does not seem to be happening. Rather, the transfer starts over from the beginning, erasing the partially transferred file.

Thank you! I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why... B ________________________________________ From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org]

Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you provide some insight? This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all attached to one computer. rsync -aPh --itemize-changes -n /Volumes/shuttle_05/2012_79_1_14_1__1199_Workprint /Volumes/3TB_LTO/LT003A/ sending incremental file list >f..t.......

Hi Kevin, I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears. So, if I am running partial (-P) and not using --whole-file or disabling the delta-transmission, why would an incomplete file be deleted and the

Hi Kevin, I'm not a systems manager so my apologies if I'm a little lost here. I'm an audiovisual conservator/archivist and I use rsync for transferring files, a lot. Yes, I connect to the server and then it shows up as a disk on my desktop and I run rsync between the external drive mounted on my computer and the now mounted server. So, this would be a local copy? And, therefore,

OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret —itemize-changes? The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them, which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777. What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps? Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on