search for: mbit

...192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server. 192.168.3.1 Eth2 192.168.4.1 Eth3 192.168.5.1 Eth4 --------------- |Incoming Interfaces Ext If |Test Clients | -> | Eth0 256 kbit, 250 ms lat Eth5 -> 100 mbit net |_____________| | Eth1 512 kbit, 100 ms lat Eth5 -> 100 mbit net | Eth2 1 mbit, 50 ms lat Eth5 -> 100 mbit net | Eth3 2 mbit, 40 ms lat Eth5 -> 100 mbit net | Eth4 10 mbit, 10 ms lat Eth5 -> 100...

...local 10.10.15.193 port 5001 connected with 10.10.15.187 port 49231 [ 6] local 10.10.15.193 port 5001 connected with 10.10.15.188 port 53197 [ 7] local 10.10.15.193 port 5001 connected with 10.10.15.189 port 55309 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 941 Mbits/sec [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 872 MBytes 728 Mbits/sec [ 6] 0.0-10.0 sec 318 MBytes 267 Mbits/sec [ 7] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 8] local 10.10.15.193 port 5001 connected with 10.10.15.184 port 48589 [ 4] local 10.10.15.193 port 5001 connected with 10.10.15.187 port 49234...

Hi guys, I''m running a freenas domU (FreeBSD 8.3 based, ZFS v28, 2 vcpus mapped to the same HT capable core) to serve storage for all purpose including other domUs running on the same host. I did some study to understand how well it works and the result is kind of confusing. In summary, the network performance between domains on the same host is worse than expected. And NFS service to

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w 128k [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 29.4 MBytes 24.6 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 940 datagrams [ 3] Server Report: [ 3]...

...orking off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) { speex_bits_reset(&mBits); speex_encode_int(mState, (Enigma::s16*)inputBuffer, &mBits); speex_bits_insert_terminator(&mBits); outputSize = speex_bits_nbytes(&mBits); /*Copy the bits to an array of char that can be written*/ Enigma::u8* cbits = new Enigma::u8[outputSize](); speex_bits_write(&...

...*encodedBuffer = new char[RECBUFFER/2]; /* RECBUFFER = 2000 */ short speexShort; float speexFloat[RECBUFFER/2]; void *mEncode = speex_encoder_init(&speex_nb_mode); /*Initialization of the structure that holds the bits*/ speex_bits_init(&mBits); // Convert the audio to a short then to a float buffer int halfBufferSize = RECBUFFER/2; for (int i = 0; i < halfBufferSize; i++) { memcpy(&speexShort, &buffer[i*2], sizeof(short)); speexFloat[i] = speexShort; } // Encode th...

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are about 3-4% less than the CEILing. Has this been your e...

...everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I WANT TO DO: 1. Traffic from 10.0.0.103 to 10.0.0.102 port 2000 should always receive at least 60Mbit/s regardless of presence of other traffic. 2. In the absence of traffic to 10.0.0.102 port 2000, all other t...

...size_t& outputSize) { short *in=(short*)inputBuffer; float *input = new float[(inputSize/2)](); int nbBytes; int i; for (i=0;i<(inputSize/2);i++) { input[i]=in[i]; } /*Flush all the bits in the struct so we can encode a new frame*/ speex_bits_reset(&mBits); /*Encode the frame*/ speex_encode(mState, input, &mBits); nbBytes = speex_bits_nbytes(&mBits); char* cbits = new char[nbBytes](); /*Copy the bits to an array of char that can be written*/ nbBytes = speex_bits_write(&mBits, cbits, nbBytes); outputSize=nbBytes...

I'm running rsync via ssh on two machines connected with 100 Mbit/s Ethernet cards (at high speed) via a Linksys switch. It's all right here in a single closet. I'm sending large files (initial transfer, nothing preexists on the destination machine) and seeing transfer rates in the 2 Mbit/s range. The CPUs on both machines are more than 90% idle, and I...

...the iperf run with a tos of b8 have the majority of the bandwidth? thx jason ./iperf -c 192.168.30.1 -t 20 -i 5 --tos 0xb8 [dscp 46] ef [ 5] local 192.168.70.1 port 33483 connected with 192.168.30.1 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0- 5.0 sec 2.80 MBytes 4.69 Mbits/sec [ 5] 5.0-10.0 sec 968 KBytes 1.59 Mbits/sec [ 5] 10.0-15.0 sec 1.73 MBytes 2.90 Mbits/sec [ 5] 15.0-20.0 sec 2.05 MBytes 3.45 Mbits/sec [ 5] 0.0-20.2 sec 7.53 MBytes 3.13 Mbits/sec ./iperf -c 192.168.30.1 -t 20 -i 5 --tos 0x28 [dscp 10] af11 [ 5] local 192.168.70.1 port 33...

...able to make calls -- once. The kernel panics as soon as someone terminates a call (and, so it would seem, at various other times too). This has only been occuring since mISDN was installed. Any ideas? Thanks, Chris > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:39:36 +1000 > From: "MBIT Technologies" <mail@mbit.com.au> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, mISDN and a Fritz card > To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <000001c68ba0$3df82a60$0201a8c0@mar...

...yte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ ** 3 tests directly on the lan, no VPN installed, as a baseline** [ 4] local 192.168.2.31 port 5001 connected with 192.168.2.243 port 2826 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 112 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.2.31 port 5001 connected with 192.168.2.243 port 2827 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 110 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.2.31 port 5001 connected with 192.168.2.243 port 2828 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 111 MBytes 93.1 Mbits/sec ** 4 tests over the VPN, MTU probing failed a...

...setting, sample rate, or bit-rate and play it back fine. - I'm using Speex version 1.1.6. I've also used 1.0.4 beforehand and experienced the same problem with it. 1) I initialize the bits, encoder, and decoder as normal (default settings seemed appropriate): speex_bits_init(&mBits); mEncode = speex_encoder_init(&speex_nb_mode); mDecode = speex_decoder_init(&speex_nb_mode); 2) I record my audio at mono 8000Hz, 16bits per sample. 3) I encode frame-sized (320 bytes) fragments. Since I deal only with char data types, I convert to 2-byte short values first and t...

...etwork-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth0.100 bridge=xenbr100 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=2 netdev=eth0.200 bridge=xenbr200 If the server has a 1 Gbit network card (e1000, tg3 module), VLANs work flawlessly. If, however, I replace the card, and use a 100 Mbit one (Intel/e100 or Realtek/8139too module), and don''t change the scripts, VLANs are not working. Why is it so? What is so fundamental in Xen networking that VLANs behaviour change so much whether one uses a 1 Gbit, or 100 Mbit network cards? There is one difference between 1 Gbit and 1...

Hi, Is it possible to attach another qdisq under a HFSC classfull ? I try it and the configuraton works : $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 30 $TC class add dev $dev parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate ${RATE}mbit ul rate ${RATE}mbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 200kbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:20 hfsc rt umax 1500b dmax 1ms rate 5mbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:40 hfsc sc rate ${RATE15}mbit ul ra...

...(Socket 775) Motherboard: Gigabyte 8I865GVMF-775 Memory: 1.5 GB Basic system: Kubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake Xen version: 3.02 (Latest 3.0 stable download) I get the following iperf results: Src Dest Throughput Dom0 Dom0 (127.0.0.1) 1.8 Gbits DomU DomU (127.0.0.1) 2.1 Gbits Dom0 DomU 125 Mbits DomU Dom0 80 Mbits DomU DomU 55 Mbits If I go DomU-DomU-DomU then I get about 35 Mbits. For all the above tests, the CPU load is 100%. I have experienced the tcp checksum corruption issue, so I have use the "ethtool -K iface tx off" fix. I have also run "xm sched-sedf 0...

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32 bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested. If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated. The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at this point.

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32 bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested. If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated. The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at this point.

...es (in the 4GB to 20GB range) and it seems to work well only transferring the changes over the internet. My usual method has been to map the Windows 2003 drive on the local linux server and then use rsync. When trying this with this system, the transfer speed is super slow from the beginning, at 6 mbit per second on a 10/100 mbit network. If I try the copy using smbclient and get, I actually get 60 mbit p/sec for the first 30gb, then it seems to slow to 6 mbit. A regular cp does basically the same thing as it starts out fast and then slows all of a sudden. This obviously will not be very practica...