Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "mayneedsp".
2013 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] Out of tree targets: API Change to MFI::CreateStackObject
Hi,
I will soon be committing a change to MachineFrameInfo::CreateStackObject
that removes the "bool MayNeedSP" parameter. This API change is part of larger
patch that re-works stack layout passes to use analysis from the StackProtector
pass to layout StackProtected objects (http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2158).
Out of tree targets will need to update their usage accordingly. The most
likely sce...
2012 Oct 02
5
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] Adding support for -fstack-protector-strong
...he existing code to allow finer
granularity and distinction between different SSP-triggering objects.
- Some minor refactoring desired. For example, in
CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp, there are checks for
determining if an object would trigger a stack protectr (MayNeedSP). These
checks are inconsistent with the checks in StackProtector. Both of these spots
should use a common (i.e., same) check.
6) Updating/adding documentation.
Note that the appropriate regression tests (updating existing tests and adding
new ones) will be included with...
2012 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] Adding support for -fstack-protector-strong
...w finer
> granularity and distinction between different SSP-triggering objects.
> - Some minor refactoring desired. For example, in
> CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp, there are checks for
> determining if an object would trigger a stack protectr (MayNeedSP). These
> checks are inconsistent with the checks in StackProtector. Both of these spots
> should use a common (i.e., same) check.
>
> 6) Updating/adding documentation.
>
>
> Note that the appropriate regression tests (updating existing tests and ad...