search for: maxk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 83 matches for "maxk".

Did you mean: mask
2003 Jun 09
1
estimate the number of clusters
Dear All, I am using Silhouette to estimate the number of clusters in a microarray dataset. Initially, I used the iris data to test my piece of code as follows: library(cluster) data(iris) mydata<-iris[,1:4] maxk<-15 # at most 15 clusters myindex<-rep(0,maxk) # hold the si values for each k clusters mdist<-1-cor(t(mydata)) #dissimlarity mdist<-as.dist(mdist) for(k in 2:maxk) { hc<-diana(mdist,diss =TRUE, stand = FALSE) si<-silhouette.default(cutree(as.hclust...
2005 Nov 09
2
problem with Running Locfit
...quot; here is the code i am using for locfit......... xt<-read.table("x.dat",header=FALSE) yt<-read.table("y.dat",header=FALSE) tst<-read.table("test.dat",header=FALSE) fitt<-locfit.raw(sapply(xt,"[",1:24),sapply(yt,"[",1:24), deg=1,maxk=700) fr<-fitted(fitt) result<-fr hltt<-predict(fitt,newdata=tst) hltt<-predict.locfit(fitt,newdata=sapply(tst,"[",1:1)) res_tt<-hltt cat(file="prd_model.dat",result, sep="\n") cat(file="prd_independent.dat",res_tt,sep="\n") Any...
2003 Mar 25
2
locfit troubles
Dear R experts, We've been playing with the locfit package and are experiencing a problem I am hoping for some help on. We have a dataset of 13k points, one dimension of which is "judgment", either 0 or 1, and the other "score", an arbitrary scalar (in this case it's between .65 and .85). We use
2013 Apr 24
3
Tests not aborting when appropriate
On 24-04-13 14:34, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > That's an error in the awk script, which is embedded in the shell > script. I know GNU awk supports lshift, maybe BSD awk doesn't. I'll > investigate that futher. On my system awk links to mawk 1.3.3 >> I don't know why, but the test continues and says all tests passed while >> that clearly isn't the
2011 Dec 29
3
Array element is function of its position in the array
I want to create a new array which selects values from an original array based on a function of the indices. That is: I want to create a new matrix Vnew[i,j,k]=Vold[i,j,ks] where ks is a function of the index elements i,j,k. I want to do this WITHOUT a loop. Call the function "ksfunction", and the array dimensions nis,njs,nks. I can do this using a loop as follows: # Loop version:
2008 Apr 25
0
[MailServer Resend] Quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
----- Original Message Header ----- Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support. From: rusty at rustcorp.com.au; To: akpm at linux-foundation.org; Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; maxk at qualcomm.com; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; ----------------------------------- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules. Use caution when accessing the contents. -------------- next part -------------- An...
2012 Jun 20
0
xen dom0 reboot when windows hvm started
...v-xen-02 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: Writing backend/vif/1/0/hotplug-status connected to xenstore. Jun 20 11:48:10 lic-srv-xen-02 kernel: [57683.909332] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 Jun 20 11:48:10 lic-srv-xen-02 kernel: [57683.909335] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> Jun 20 11:48:10 lic-srv-xen-02 kernel: [57683.923229] device tap-vif-win2k3 entered promiscuous mode Jun 20 11:48:10 lic-srv-xen-02 kernel: [57683.923254] eth0: port 3(tap-vif-win2k3) entered forwarding state Jun 20 11:48:10 lic-srv-xen-02 kernel: [57683.923257] eth0: port 3(tap...
2008 Jul 12
4
[PATCH] tun: Fix/rewrite packet filtering logic
...hypervisors can push RX filtering that is currently done in the guest into the host context therefore saving wakeups and unnecessary data transfer. This is on top of the latest and greatest :). Assuming virt folks are ok with the API this should go into 2.6.27. Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk at qualcomm.com> --- drivers/net/tun.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- include/linux/if_tun.h | 24 +++- 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index 2693f88..901551c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c...
2008 Jul 12
4
[PATCH] tun: Fix/rewrite packet filtering logic
...hypervisors can push RX filtering that is currently done in the guest into the host context therefore saving wakeups and unnecessary data transfer. This is on top of the latest and greatest :). Assuming virt folks are ok with the API this should go into 2.6.27. Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk at qualcomm.com> --- drivers/net/tun.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- include/linux/if_tun.h | 24 +++- 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index 2693f88..901551c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c...
2019 Apr 01
1
udev rename NIC failed
...git f8de107 kernel: [ 250.280261] compat.git: mlnx_ofed/mlnx-ofa_kernel-4.0.git kernel: [ 250.287865] mlx5_core 0000:3b:00.0: firmware version: 14.23.1020 kernel: [ 250.293492] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 kernel: [ 250.293731] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk at qualcomm.com> kernel: [ 250.360407] nbd: registered device at major 43 kernel: [ 250.367659] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (65536 buckets, 262144 max) kernel: [ 250.373103] VFIO - User Level meta-driver version: 0.3 kernel: [ 250.455352] EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted. Opts: (nul...
2012 Feb 24
0
SELinux killed my qemu-kvm
.../var/log/messages: Feb 24 17:25:28 desk libvirtd: 17:25:28.531: error : virDomainDiskDefForeachPath:7637 : unable to open disk path /dev/hda: No medium found Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk at qualcomm.com> Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: device vnet0 entered promiscuous mode Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: New device vnet0 does not support netpoll Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: Disabling netpoll for virbr0 Feb 24 17:25:28 desk kernel: virbr0: topology change detected, propagating Feb 24 1...
2010 Oct 28
0
HVM + IGD Graphics + 4GB RAM = Soft Lockup
....344364] [<ffffffff8012bfd9>] sys_ioctl+0x99/0xb0 [ 244.344364] [<ffffffff8000c8c8>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 244.344364] [<00007f5e40d87547>] 0x7f5e40d87547 [ 260.150678] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 [ 260.150683] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> [ 260.177987] device tap1.0 entered promiscuous mode [ 260.178016] br0: port 3(tap1.0) entering forwarding state [ 260.640363] pciback: vpci: 0000:00:02.0: assign to virtual slot 0 [ 260.641060] pciback: vpci: 0000:00:02.1: assign to virtual slot 0 func 1 [ 260.641563] pciback...
2010 Oct 28
0
HVM + IGD Graphics + 4GB RAM = Soft Lockup
....344364] [<ffffffff8012bfd9>] sys_ioctl+0x99/0xb0 [ 244.344364] [<ffffffff8000c8c8>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 244.344364] [<00007f5e40d87547>] 0x7f5e40d87547 [ 260.150678] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 [ 260.150683] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> [ 260.177987] device tap1.0 entered promiscuous mode [ 260.178016] br0: port 3(tap1.0) entering forwarding state [ 260.640363] pciback: vpci: 0000:00:02.0: assign to virtual slot 0 [ 260.641060] pciback: vpci: 0000:00:02.1: assign to virtual slot 0 func 1 [ 260.641563] pciback...
2006 Jul 24
1
DomU crashs on startup
...Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation. e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.10-k2-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.49. tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> netconsole: not configured, aborting Xen virtual console successfully installed as tty1 Event-channel device installed. netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver. Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2 ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes;...
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch
2008 Jul 09
2
Multicast and receive filtering in TUN/TAP
Yesterday while fixing xoff stuckiness issue in the TUN/TAP driver I got a chance to look into the multicast filtering code in there. And immediately realized how terribly broken & confusing it is. The patch was originally done by Shaun (CC'ed) and went in without any proper ACK from me, Dave or Jeff. Here is the original ref
2008 Jul 09
2
Multicast and receive filtering in TUN/TAP
Yesterday while fixing xoff stuckiness issue in the TUN/TAP driver I got a chance to look into the multicast filtering code in there. And immediately realized how terribly broken & confusing it is. The patch was originally done by Shaun (CC'ed) and went in without any proper ACK from me, Dave or Jeff. Here is the original ref
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the