search for: mask

Please tell me whether the following implementation is correct..... My target supports 64 bit mask means immediate(0-2^63) I have implemented it but i dont know whether its correct or not. Please see the changes below that i have made in x86isellowering.cpp static SDValue lower2048BitVectorShuffle(const SDLoc &DL, ArrayRef<int> Mask, MVT VT, SD...

...t do I use for a decision? For my data set I have p.value of 0.05496421 returned from the shapiro.test and 0.882027 returned from the jarque.bera.test. I have included the data set below. Thank you. Kevin "Category","Period","Residual" "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",1/1/2005,-0.449735723758323 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",2/1/2005,0.281461045050074 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",3/1/2005,0.591383050911335 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",4/1/2005,0.239998659520616 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",5/1/2005,0.00343879...

...set-7.swf |binary test/image/clip-change-set-7.swf.png |binary test/image/clip-change-set-8.swf |binary test/image/clip-change-set-8.swf.png |binary test/image/clip-change.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++ test/image/mask-affected-by-clip-5.swf |binary test/image/mask-affected-by-clip-5.swf.png |binary test/image/mask-affected-by-clip-6.swf |binary test/image/mask-affected-by-clip-6.swf.png |binary test/image/mask-affected-by-clip-7.swf |binary test/image/mask-affected-...

...domain logons = Yes os level = 33 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes admin users = root dos filetimes = Yes dos filetime resolution = Yes fake directory create times = Yes [confid] path = /fmit/confid valid users = @IT write list = @IT force group = @IT read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 [alriddle] path = /b/alriddle valid users = @IT, @ariddle write list = @IT, ariddle force user = ariddle force group = @ariddle read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 [barbarah] path = /b/barbarah valid users = @IT, @barbarah write list =...

...the resulting columns have names derived from the original filenames. Example code is below. My question is, where are these names stored in the list? Are there methods that can access this from the list? Is there a way to preserve them verbatim? Thanks -Ed > example.names [1] "con1-1-masked-bottom-green.tsv" "con1-1-masked-bottom-red.tsv" [3] "con1-1-masked-top-green.tsv" "con1-1-masked-top-red.tsv" > example.list <- strsplit(example.names, "-") > example.list [[1]] [1] "con1" "1" "masked&...

On 11/6/20 12:39 PM, Sjoerd Meijer wrote: Hello Simon, Thanks for your replies, very useful. And yes, thanks for the example and making the target differences clear: ; Some examples: ; RISC-V V & VE(*): ; %mask = (splat i1 1) ; %evl = min(256, %n - %i) ; MVE/SVE : ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %n) ; %evl = call @llvm.vscale() ; AVX: ; %mask = icmp (%i + (seq <8 x i32> 0,1,2,.,)), %n, ; %evl = i32 8 Unless I miss something, the AVX example is semantically the same as get.a...

I am still fighting with this issue. I did the following: I connected to the NAS with a read-only account called kodi. I traversed various folders and I finally opened an image. Everything went fine. Looking at the logs, the get_entry mask file only shows the final folder: smbd_dirptr_get_entry mask=[Anhelina Viber] found Users/luca/Pictures/Canon/Alessandro/Amici/Anhelina Viber fname=Anhelina Viber (Anhelina Viber) smbd_dirptr_get_entry mask=[Ginevra TikTok] found Users/luca/Pictures/Canon/Alessandro/Amici/Ginevra TikTok fname=Gi...

...thin tc. But alas, I am having an issue I know I should not be having. I am trying to filter all IRC traffic on my network so that it neither consumes large amounts of band width nor gets to little band width. I originally wanted to filter just ports 6660-6669 but quickly realized that the bit masking wouldn''t allow for a single rule to cover them, so I opted instead to filter ports 6656-66671 which would give me the use of all 4 bits in that range. For reference, 6656 = 0x1a00, 6671 = 0x1a0f. As such, I have the following rules in my setup: eth0 egress to the internet (eth0 is t...

...ofile ; logon path = \\%L\profile\%U [profiles] comment = Network Profiles Service path = /var/lib/samba/profiles browseable = No read only = Yes printable = No [homes] comment = Arquivos MultiSigns read only = No create mask = 0750 directory mask = 0750 writeable = yes browseable = yes [publico] comment = Publico MultiSigns path = /home/publico read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 writeable = yes browseable = yes [progr...

...L\profiles\%U ; logon home = \\%L\%U\profile logon path = \\%L\%U\profile ; logon path = \\%L\profile\%U [profiles] comment = Network Profiles Service path = /var/lib/samba/profiles browseable = No read only = Yes printable = No [homes] comment = Arquivos MultiSigns read only = No create mask = 0750 directory mask = 0750 writeable = yes browseable = yes [publico] comment = Publico MultiSigns path = /home/publico read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 writeable = yes browseable = yes [programas] comment = Programas Internos path = /programas read only = No...

...- // if (i->srcExists(0) && i->src(0).getFile() == FILE_MEMORY_CONST) - // code[0] |= 0x4000; + code[1] = f->absolute ? 0x11000000 : 0x12000000; + if (i->srcExists(0) && i->src(0).getFile() == FILE_MEMORY_CONST) + code[0] |= 0x80; mask = 3; break; case OP_CALL: - code[1] = f->absolute ? 0x00000 : 0x13000000; // XXX - // if (i->srcExists(0) && i->src(0).getFile() == FILE_MEMORY_CONST) - // code[0] |= 0x4000; + code[1] = f->absolute ? 0x11000000 : 0x13000000; + if (i->src...

On 11/6/20 8:49 AM, Roger Ferrer Ibáñez wrote: Hi Sjoerd, Trying to remember how everything fits together here, but could get.active.lane.mask not create the %mask of the VP intrinsics? Or in other words, in the vectoriser, who's producing the %mask and %evl that is consumed by the VP intrinsics? I'm not sure what would be the best way here. I think about the Loop Vectorizer. I imagine at some point we can teach LV to emit VPred...

...n/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.ldb/*.mdw/*.dbf/*.dat/*.fpt/*.cdx/*.idx/ csc policy = disable [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %U read only = No create mask = 0700 force create mode = 0700 security mask = 00 force security mode = 0700 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 directory security mask = 00 browseable = No oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No [printers] c...

Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I spent some time chatting with Adam about this and have a better > understanding of his concerns here. It seems to me that if having > masking intrinsics is the long-term solution we want, we should do > that now (for add and sub) rather than building arbitrary matrix > layout info into intrinsics, since a mask has all the information > that we actually need. > > I think that sounds like a reasonable compromi...

...dns proxy = No wins server = xxx.xx.xxx.xxx kernel oplocks = No lock spin time = 3 remote announce = xxx.xx.xxx.xxx acl check permissions = No acl group control = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No strict locking = No [top] comment = Top of the Tree path = /top read only = No create mask = 0755 directory security mask = 0755 [projects] comment = Project space path = /XKA1/projects read only = No create mask = 0775 directory mask = 02771 inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes [profiles] comment = Windows Roaming Profiles path = /XKA1/profiles valid users = +admin,...

hi guys my samba share has inherit acls = Yes and inherits(I guess) from global: create mask = 0744 directory mask = 0755 Now, share's underlying filesystem has acls set on a folder: user::rwx user:me:rwx user:appmgr:r-x group::--- mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:me:rwx default:user:appmgr:r-x default:group::--- default:mask::rwx default:other::--- In shell when...

Introduction ========== We would like to add support for masked vector signed/unsigned integer division and remainder in the LLVM IR by introducing new target-independent intrinsics. This follows similar work which was done already for masked vector loads and stores - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/078059.html. Another relevant referen...

...i64>* %indices ; load a vector of indices %vp = gep <2 x f32*> %base, <2 x i64> %vi ; compute an address vector %vx = load <2 x f32*> %vp ; gather This is significantly less ugly than a build-it-yourself gather, and would be much friendlier to masks (below) than the "individually extract each i1 from the mask" approach. Note that this wouldn't support multiple alignments or multiple address spaces in a single gather/scatter. Similarly, volatile would be all-or-nothing. These don't seem like show-stoppers though. This would...

; RISC-V V & VE(*): ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %i) ; %evl = min(256, %n - %i) ; MVE/SVE/AVX : ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %n) ; %evl = call @llvm.vscale() For VE, we want to do as much predication as possible through %evl and as little as possible with %mask. This has performance implications on V...

On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:32 am, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2008 17:56, Dan Gohman wrote: >> The applymask approach leverages use-def information rather than >> what can be thought of as duplicating a subset of it, making the IR > > I don't understand what you mean by "duplicating" here. If you look just at the case where every instruction in a given use-def sub-dag uses the s...