search for: max_part

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "max_part".

Did you mean: max_param
2018 May 23
3
[PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
..., int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_nr, "Maximum number of brd devices"); unsigned long rd_size = CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE; -module_param(rd_size, ulong, S_IRUGO); +module_param(rd_size, ulong, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_size, "Size of each RAM disk in kbytes."); static int max_part = 1; -module_param(max_part, int, S_IRUGO); +module_param(max_part, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_part, "Num Minors to reserve between devices"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c index ab21976a87b2.....
2018 May 23
3
[PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
..., int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_nr, "Maximum number of brd devices"); unsigned long rd_size = CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE; -module_param(rd_size, ulong, S_IRUGO); +module_param(rd_size, ulong, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_size, "Size of each RAM disk in kbytes."); static int max_part = 1; -module_param(max_part, int, S_IRUGO); +module_param(max_part, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_part, "Num Minors to reserve between devices"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c index ab21976a87b2.....
2013 Apr 09
2
[Qemu-devel] debugging qemu-nbd.c
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:18:50AM -0400, Skippy VonDrake wrote: > Hello, > > Apologies upfront if posting to this list is inappropriate. > > I have an app that forks a process with calls qemu-nbd with an offset > into an image. > The app then uses libguestfs to attach the nbd device. > But it appears that qemu is failing. When you say "qemu is failing", do you
2020 Sep 01
10
remove revalidate_disk()
Hi Jens, this series removes the revalidate_disk() function, which has been a really odd duck in the last years. The prime reason why most people use it is because it propagates a size change from the gendisk to the block_device structure. But it also calls into the rather ill defined ->revalidate_disk method which is rather useless for the callers. So this adds a new helper to just