search for: max_param

..._pad : DATA_BLOB length=0 [2016/01/26 10:09:15.591154, 10, pid=12027, effective(1001, 1006), real(1001, 0)] ../source3/smbd/notify.c:194(notify_marshall_changes) Client only wanted 32 bytes, trying to marshall 36 bytes This could be he reason. I don't know why max_param would be changed as it is initially set to 8kB There is something that looks like change to the max_param bit earlier [2016/01/26 10:09:07.131430, 10, pid=12027, effective(1001, 1006), real(1001, 0)] ../source3/smbd/smb2_notify.c:230(smbd_smb2_notify_send) smbd_smb2_notify_send: watchfolder/tes...

...NIED Another server with only difference being samba version 3.3.14-40.el5 works perfectly. Tried this with two different users belonging to "domain admins" group. Using rpcclient with -d10, ends with: rpc_api_pipe: host localhost num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=200, this_data=200, max_data=4280, param_offset=82, param_disp=0, data_disp=0 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr rpc_hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 02 0003 flags : 03 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00...

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:57:34AM -0800, ivenhov wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone had similar issues in the past? > I still cannot find reason why notification of file modification of files in > subdirs is not visible on client machines Someone needs to send network traces and debug level 10 logs for this. And try to reproduce the same against a Windows server. Volker -- SerNet

...0044 version: 00000002 [2011/01/21 09:50:41.284917, 5] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:1372(rpc_api_pipe_send) rpc_api_pipe: host mvpns119.machinevisionproducts.com [2011/01/21 09:50:41.284943, 10] libsmb/clitrans.c:925(cli_trans_format) num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=72, this_data=72, max_data=4280, param_offset=82, param_disp=0, data_disp=0 [2011/01/21 09:50:41.284971, 10] libsmb/smb_signing.c:115(smb_signing_md5) smb_signing_md5: sequence number 6 [2011/01/21 09:50:41.284987, 10] libsmb/smb_signing.c:209(smb_signing_sign_pdu) smb_signing_...

...: 8a885d04-1ceb-11c9-9fe8-08002b104860 if_version : 0x00000002 (2) auth_info : DATA_BLOB length=0 rpc_api_pipe: host serverDC1001.dan2003.sample.domain.com num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=72, this_data=72, max_data=4280, param_offset=84, param_pad=2, param_disp=0, data_offset=84, data_pad=0, data_disp=0 rpc_read_send: data_to_read: 52 r: struct ncacn_packet rpc_vers : 0x05 (5) rpc_vers_minor : 0x00 (0) ptype...

...8a885d04-1ceb-11c9-9fe8-08002b104860 > if_version : 0x00000002 (2) > auth_info : DATA_BLOB length=0 > rpc_api_pipe: host serverDC1001.dan2003.sample.domain.com > num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, > data_total=72, this_data=72, max_data=4280, param_offset=84, param_pad=2, > param_disp=0, data_offset=84, data_pad=0, data_disp=0 > rpc_read_send: data_to_read: 52 > r: struct ncacn_packet > rpc_vers : 0x05 (5) > rpc_vers_minor...

...object : union dcerpc_object(case 0) empty: struct dcerpc_empty _pad : DATA_BLOB length=0 stub_and_verifier : DATA_BLOB length=0 rpc_api_pipe: host xxxxxxxxxx num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=96, this_data=96, max_data=4280, param_offset=84, param_pad=2, param_disp=0, data_offset=84, data_pad=0, data_disp=0 cli_api_pipe failed: NT_STATUS_IO_DEVICE_ERROR rpc command function failed! (NT_STATUS_IO_DEVICE_ERROR) return code = -1 -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ --...

...object : union dcerpc_object(case 0) empty: struct dcerpc_empty _pad : DATA_BLOB length=0 stub_and_verifier : DATA_BLOB length=0 rpc_api_pipe: host bar num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=80, this_data=80, max_data=4280, param_offset=84, param_pad=2, param_disp=0, data_offset=84, data_pad=0, data_disp=0 rpc_read_send: data_to_read: 20 r: struct ncacn_packet rpc_vers : 0x05 (5) rpc_vers_minor : 0x00 (0) ptype...

...ype3: 00 0008 frag_len : 015b 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000006 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req hdr_req 0010 alloc_hint: 0000050a 0014 context_id: 0000 0016 opnum : 0009 rpc_api_pipe: host localhost num_setup=2, max_setup=0, param_total=0, this_param=0, max_param=0, data_total=347, this_data=347, max_data=54, param_offset=82, param_disp=0, data_disp=0 cli_chain_cork: mid=25 cli_state_handler called with flags 2 cli_state_handler called with flags 2 cli_state_handler called with flags 1 cli_state_handler: received 88 bytes, smb_len(evt_inbuf) = 84 hand...

...:02:20, 0] libsmb/clidfs.c:227(do_connect) Domain=[.....] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.5] [2011/09/19 12:02:20, 4] libsmb/clidfs.c:233(do_connect) session setup ok [2011/09/19 12:02:20, 10] libsmb/clitrans.c:299(cli_trans_format) num_setup=1, max_setup=0, param_total=44, this_param=44, max_param=2, data_total=0, this_data=0, max_data=16644, param_offset=68, param_pad=0, param_disp=0, data_offset=112, data_pad=0, data_disp=0 [2011/09/19 12:02:20, 4] libsmb/clidfs.c:276(do_connect) tconx ok [2011/09/19 12:02:20, 3] lib/util.c:435(dos_clean_name) dos_clean_name [\\directory\filen...

...NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_ANONYMOUS NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_ALWAYS_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_VERSION NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_KEY_EXCH NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - using NTLM1 session setup ok tconx ok num_setup=0, max_setup=0, param_total=33, this_param=33, max_param=8, data_total=0, this_data=0, max_data=65535, param_offset=92, param_pad=2, param_disp=0, data_offset=126, data_pad=1, data_disp=0 num_setup=0, max_setup=0, param_total=33, this_param=33, max_param=8, data_total=0, this_data=0, max_data=65535, param_offset=92, param_pad=2, param_disp=0, data_offset...

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

Good afternoon all, I'm a web developer (c#) who also manages a small hosting environment. Roughly, our configuration is: Two IIS7 (Windows Server 2008 Web) servers which share configuration data and site files from a SMB share located on a ubuntu server. The ubuntu server is currently running 3.0.28a which is quite old, but read on. We've been having a problem with the change

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --