search for: mauritsvb

I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ?decoder compliance test corpus? and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes). I seem to recall someone on this list (most likely lvqcl or Martijn van Beurden) mentioning something about

As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh memories, I?d leave them out of the actual changelog. * Improved efficiency of 24 bit decoding. (https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ea0d5ddadc6902e873983c89f473130b3bb6625f) *

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > > > Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page > > https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads > > on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. > > I changed the link to point to: > &...

On 23 Nov 2014, at 15:06, MauritsVB <mauritsvb at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please at least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some bug...

> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC has moved from Sour...

On 24 Nov 2014, at 10:13, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of >> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might >> as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh >> memories, I?d leave them out of the ac...

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:37 AM, MauritsVB <mauritsvb at xs4all.nl> wrote: > There have been some offers to help building for various platforms: > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004271.html and there was > discussion last year to create official ?blessed builds?, compiled by Xiph > for security reasons....

Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/ This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org.

On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the >> original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that. > > Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since 2009 > or so. > > Erik I meant who is registered as project ow...

On 12/6/16, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. > > I had sort of hoped I'd finished :). Seems I was wrong! > >> I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although >> admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps...

Nice work on getting flac 1.3.1 out! Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. However, if for instance the OS X binary is just around the corner it would makes sense to wait for that. Will the 1.3.1 binaries also be uploaded to the

I can confirm git head builds and passes /make fullcheck/ (skipping the noise part of test_streams.sh) on - armv6-linux (Raspbian), GCC 4.6 & GCC 4.8 - i686-pc-mingw32, GCC 4.8.1 - MSVC 2005 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) - MSVC 2013 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) Furthermore, I've also ran the test_streams.sh of FLAC 1.2.1 with FLAC 1.2.1 as encoder and git as

Hi Erik, I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older ones are useful to consider including: Fixed a segmentation fault in libFLAC http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/425/ Changed the LPC order guess for a slight compression improvement,

I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. Olav Sunde At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl wrote: >>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries

Hi Martijn, I don?t know if it?s just my Firefox or whether something breaks during the parsing of the email but none of your links seem to work for me. I feel it might have something to do with the spaces in the file names of the PDFs, which doesn?t translate well to URLs. Thanks, Lennard > On 3 Feb 2016, at 18:04, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Op

In this topic on Hydrogen Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain. The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since Commit http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=0554a4aee6966bc5b251364753ef85de72dfab19 because as of 1.3.0 FLAC supports Replaygain with many

MauritsVB wrote: > As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of > changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might > as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh > memories, I?d leave them out of the actual changelog. Than...

On 11/28/14 09:44 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> >MauritsVB wrote: >> > >>> > >Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page >>> > >https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads >>> > >on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. >&...

...on (or the hassle with SF?s byzantine file interface) and if people are looking for older versions they could always go to http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/. On 29 Nov 2014, at 05:44, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> MauritsVB wrote: >> >>> Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page >>> https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads >>> on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. >> >> I changed the link...

MauritsVB wrote: > I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I had sort of hoped I'd finished :). Seems I was wrong! > I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although > admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older > ones...