search for: mateuszx

...it > last?) hit in the table wins, IIRC, so if an actual device exposes some > data in several OIDs (e.g. with different-precision data types, like in > vendor-extended vs. IETF-standard MIBs), the preference ordering may matter. > > Jim > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 2:01?PM mateuszx <jasmati09 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> So what would it take me to edit NUT's code for my case to work? My >> Network Management Card sends its output state using unfortunately only (I >> guess so) this OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.11.1.1.0 >> Weirdly the standard w...

...alue with no problem but the question is: How do I integrate my bit recognition with NUT's nut2mib struct and so on... I am working on drivers/apc-mib.c UPS driver Maybe is there something relatable already in the code so I can "make my work easier"? Matthew czw., 9 mar 2023 o 16:00 mateuszx <jasmati09 at gmail.com> napisa?(a): > I've got an update on this case > Using tkmib I discovered that my UPS (NMC per say) sends its state by OID > 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.11.1.1.0 > .iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.apc.products.hardware.ups.upsState.upsBasicState.ups...

...e similar devices. The first (or was it last?) hit in the table wins, IIRC, so if an actual device exposes some data in several OIDs (e.g. with different-precision data types, like in vendor-extended vs. IETF-standard MIBs), the preference ordering may matter. Jim On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 2:01?PM mateuszx <jasmati09 at gmail.com> wrote: > So what would it take me to edit NUT's code for my case to work? My > Network Management Card sends its output state using unfortunately only (I > guess so) this OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.11.1.1.0 > Weirdly the standard way of obtaining Batt...

...y question: is getting ups.status about changing "a few lines of code" in let's say apc-mib.c file in the drivers folder of the repo or I should make a commit and code ups.status depending on bits received using this OID? I am running NUT 2.8.0 at the moment. czw., 9 mar 2023 o 14:14 mateuszx <jasmati09 at gmail.com> napisa?(a): > I've got an update on this case > Using tkmib I discovered that my UPS (NMC per say) sends its state by OID > 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.11.1.1.0 > .iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.apc.products.hardware.ups.upsState.upsBasicState.ups...

mateuszx via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC MGE > Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH). > I have it set up to work with snmp-ups NUT driver. > Despite many readings from *upsc* command I am not receivin...

...is involved? There were recently PRs (merged to master-branch, eventually will be in 2.8.1) about more SNMP-UPS support including APCs e.g. 1674, 1679, 1113 (should be in 2.8.0)... Many distros still ship 2.7.4... Jim On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 00:57 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > mateuszx via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > > > At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC MGE > > Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH). > > I have it set up to work with snmp-ups NUT driver. > > Despite many readings from *upsc* c...

Hello, At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC MGE Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH). I have it set up to work with snmp-ups NUT driver. Despite many readings from *upsc* command I am not receiving "On Line Status" (ups.status OL) nor "On Battery Status" (ups.status OB) and therefore I can't get my systems to shutdown during a power outage event.

Hello, At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC MGE Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH). I have it set up to work with snmp-ups NUT driver. Despite many readings from *upsc* command I am not receiving "On Line Status" (ups.status OL) nor "On Battery Status" (ups.status OB) and therefore I can't get my systems to shutdown during a power outage event.