search for: materialize

So I've been an avid user of Left 4 Dead 1 and 2. This problem only seems to arise in L4D2, where the audio will cut out. Now, not completely, some things will drop but some stay, for instance, I can hear the noise my gun makes, the shots fired but I don't hear characters talking anymore or any special infected sounds. Another instance is I'll see my gun firing but I'll hear the

Hello, i've ubuntu 8.04 (32bit) with wine 1.0-rc5. I've installed without problem vampire: bloodlines and it works fine in the menu, but when the game starts the audio works well but the video is all "orange". As graphic card i've a ati moblitiy x1600 with official driver (installed using envyNG) and before start the game i've used compiz-switch to disable compiz. the

I am having trouble getting standard errors for contrasts using se.contrast() in what appears to be a simple case to me. The following test example illustrates my problem: Lab <- factor(rep(c("1","2","3"),each=12)) Material <- factor(rep(c("A","B","C","D"),each=3,times=3)) Measurement <-

I've tried without success to calculate interaction and main effects contrasts using R. I've found the functions C(), contrasts(), se.contrasts() and fit.contrasts() in package gmodels. Given the url for a small dataset and the two-way anova model below, I'd like to reproduce the results from appended SAS code. Thanks. --Dale. ## the dataset (from Montgomery) twoway <-

Hi, I''m struggling with this and I''m not sure if it is obvious or dumb (or both). I have a basic create method like so: def creatematerial @material = Material.new(params[:material]) if @material.save flash[:notice] = "Material successfully created." end Ok so far, but now I want to retrieve that object that was just saved so that it can be used in the

Hi everyone, I would like to apply the following patch (java-materialize.patch) in order to materialize Java functions in vmkit. The current implementation is not satisfactory because the materializeFunction of a module provider is not supposed to do anything but read the bitcode, which is not the case in Java. In Java, materializing a function Foo can possibly trig...

Hello all, I want to upate a entry in a one to many relation, but is doesn''t work. I can add or delete a specific entry, but I can''t update it. Can anyone help me? Here is the code: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :materials end class Material < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to: person end class PersonController < ApplicationController def update

On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to apply the following patch (java-materialize.patch) > in order to materialize Java functions in vmkit. The current > implementation is not satisfactory because the materializeFunction > of a module provider is not supposed to do anything but read the > bitcode, which is not the case in Java. In Java, materializing a >...

Dear R user, I am trying to reproduce the results in Montgomery D.C (2001, chap 13, example 13-1). Briefly, there are three suppliers, four batches nested within suppliers and three determinations of purity (response variable) on each batch. It is a two stage nested design, where suppliers are fixed and batches are random. y_ijk=mu+tau_i+beta_j(nested in tau_i)+epsilon_ijk Here are the

Hey everybody, I'm VERY new at using Wine, so forgive me if this is a foolish question! Recently I've been trying to run the Torchlight 2 Beta under Wine? the game itself runs flawlessly, but in order to get it to run past the beta expiration date I have to run another application (I'm not entirely sure what it is, my belief is that it emulates a server of some sort to play on). No

OK. About the error it’s a long story, so it’s probably better to pin some source code here. Below is a piece of code related to my problem, clipped from lib/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.cpp. I was wondering what “materialized” means here. Value *Mapper::mapBlockAddress(const BlockAddress &BA) { Function *F = cast<Function>(mapValue(BA.getFunction())); // F may not have materialized its initializer. In that case, create a // dummy basic block for now, and replace it once we've materialized all...

...l value. ModuleSummaryIndex::getOriginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is still appended to the expected original name. Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function is called to create a global variable in the destination module that corresponds to SGV. I found that newly c...

Bruce, Thanks for the explanation. But based on my inspection on the source code, it seems that materialization is related to lazily reading LLVM objects (Module, Function, etc.) into the memory from bitcode files, which is possibly useful during LTO. I’m not sure though. Pei From: <bruce.hoult at gmail.com> on behalf of Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28,

Hello Teresa, Thank you for your analysis. One thing to note is that the global materializer materializes the value as a function declaration, not a function definition. As I pasted on my first email, ; Materializable ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable define weak_odr void @foo(%1*) unnamed_addr #7 comdat($comdat1) align 2 personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0 {} is materialized...

I’m current debugging one of my LLVM passes which utilized inline assembly. I constantly encounter crashes related to “value materialization”, according to the error messages I received. It seems a big concept in LLVM (or maybe generally in compilation), but I cannot find any document that is comprehensive enough to help me understand what exactly materialization is for. Could someone offer some

...value. ModuleSummaryIndex::getOriginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is still appended to the expected original name. Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function is called to create a global variable in the destination module that corresponds to SGV. I found that newly c...

Hello, What is the best material(book, pdfs, ...) for programmers, who have extensive experience in other programming languages, to learn R programming? I think there are many materials on how to use R for specific statistical jobs, but I haven't seen any material particularly designed for R programming. Thanks.

...iginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the > original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is > still appended to the expected original name. > > > > Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global > value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls > IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is > nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function > is called to create a global variable in the destination module that > corresponds to SGV....

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com> wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > Thank you for your analysis. One thing to note is that the global > materializer materializes the value as a function declaration, not a > function definition. As I pasted on my first email, > > > > ; Materializable > > ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable > > define weak_odr void @foo(%1*) unnamed_addr #7 comdat($comdat1) align 2 > personality i32...

...pied during linking. Previously on one of our products, we would lazily load our runtime module (around 9000 functions), and link some user module into this (which is in all practical use cases much smaller). Then, post linking, we have a pass that runs over the module and rips out all the un-materialized functions that weren't being used in the original user module. I only just noticed that LinkModules has a flags parameter that can take a LinkOnlyNeeded flag, which made me wonder if I could reverse the link order (EG. link from the lazily loaded runtime module into the user module), set...