search for: materi

...and then playing L4D2: Code: fixme:d3d:IWineD3DOcclusionQueryImpl_GetData 0x20295e88 Wrong thread, returning 1. fixme:d3d:IWineD3DOcclusionQueryImpl_GetData 0x202969a8 Wrong thread, returning 1. fixme:d3d:IWineD3DOcclusionQueryImpl_GetData 0x16dcb7c0 Wrong thread, returning 1. Reference Count for Material vgui_white (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material __background (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material __loading (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material __particlesdepthwrite (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material __particlesdepthwrite (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material __fontpage (1) != 0 Reference...

...und to the same texture image unit. \n" fixme:d3d_shader:print_glsl_info_log Error received from GLSL shader #127: "Fragment shader(s) linked, vertex shader(s) linked. \n Validation failed - samplers of different types are bound to the same texture image unit. \n" Reference Count for Material ___error (132) != 0 Reference Count for Material debug/debugmrmnormals (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarframe (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarlace (1) != 0 Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarblackfill (1) != 0 Reference Count for Mater...

I am having trouble getting standard errors for contrasts using se.contrast() in what appears to be a simple case to me. The following test example illustrates my problem: Lab <- factor(rep(c("1","2","3"),each=12)) Material <- factor(rep(c("A","B","C","D"),each=3,times=3)) Measurement <- c(12.20,12.28,12.16,15.51,15.02,15.29,18.14,18.08,18.21,18.54,18.36 ,18.45,12.59,12.30,12.67,14.98,15.46,15.22,18.54,18.31,18.60,19.21,18.77 ,18.69,12.72,12.78,12.66,15.33,15.19,15.24,18...

...ge gmodels. Given the url for a small dataset and the two-way anova model below, I'd like to reproduce the results from appended SAS code. Thanks. --Dale. ## the dataset (from Montgomery) twoway <- read.table("http://dsteele.veryspeedy.net/sta501/twoway.txt", col.names=c('material', 'temp','voltage'),colClasses=c('factor', 'factor', 'numeric')) ## the model fit <- aov(voltage ~ material*temp, data=twoway) /* SAS code */ proc glm data=twoway; class material temp; model voltage = material temp material*temp; contrast '21...

Hi, I''m struggling with this and I''m not sure if it is obvious or dumb (or both). I have a basic create method like so: def creatematerial @material = Material.new(params[:material]) if @material.save flash[:notice] = "Material successfully created." end Ok so far, but now I want to retrieve that object that was just saved so that it can be used in the view. Something like... @newmaterial = Material.find(@mat...

Hi everyone, I would like to apply the following patch (java-materialize.patch) in order to materialize Java functions in vmkit. The current implementation is not satisfactory because the materializeFunction of a module provider is not supposed to do anything but read the bitcode, which is not the case in Java. In Java, materializing a function Foo can possibly...

Hello all, I want to upate a entry in a one to many relation, but is doesn''t work. I can add or delete a specific entry, but I can''t update it. Can anyone help me? Here is the code: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :materials end class Material < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to: person end class PersonController < ApplicationController def update person = Person.find(@params["id"]) person.name = @params["name"] first_material = person.materials.find(@params["mater...

On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to apply the following patch (java-materialize.patch) > in order to materialize Java functions in vmkit. The current > implementation is not satisfactory because the materializeFunction > of a module provider is not supposed to do anything but read the > bitcode, which is not the case in Java. In Java, materializing a...

...are the data, purity<-c(1,-2,-2,1, -1,-3, 0,4, 0,-4, 1, 0, 1,0,-1,0, -2,4,0,3, -3,2,-2,2, 2,-2,1,3, 4,0,-1,2, 0,2,2,1) suppli<-factor(c(rep(1,12),rep(2,12),rep(3,12))) batch<-factor(rep(c(1,2,3,4),9)) material<-data.frame(purity,suppli,batch) If I use the function aov, I get material.aov<-aov(purity~suppli+suppli:batch,data=material) summary(material.aov) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) suppli 2 15.056 7.528 2.8526 0.07736 . suppli:batch 9 69.917 7.769 2.9439 0....

...ess=1 func=20 method=0) fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33efc0,0x00000001), stub! Creating resource group General Creating resource group Internal Creating resource group Autodetect SceneManagerFactory for type 'DefaultSceneManager' registered. Registering ResourceManager for type Material Registering ResourceManager for type Mesh Registering ResourceManager for type Skeleton MovableObjectFactory for type 'ParticleSystem' registered. OverlayElementFactory for type Panel registered. OverlayElementFactory for type BorderPanel registered. OverlayElementFactory for type TextAre...

OK. About the error it’s a long story, so it’s probably better to pin some source code here. Below is a piece of code related to my problem, clipped from lib/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.cpp. I was wondering what “materialized” means here. Value *Mapper::mapBlockAddress(const BlockAddress &BA) { Function *F = cast<Function>(mapValue(BA.getFunction())); // F may not have materialized its initializer. In that case, create a // dummy basic block for now, and replace it once we've materialize...

...l value. ModuleSummaryIndex::getOriginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is still appended to the expected original name. Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function is called to create a global variable in the destination module that corresponds to SGV. I found that ne...

Bruce, Thanks for the explanation. But based on my inspection on the source code, it seems that materialization is related to lazily reading LLVM objects (Module, Function, etc.) into the memory from bitcode files, which is possibly useful during LTO. I’m not sure though. Pei From: <bruce.hoult at gmail.com> on behalf of Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 a...

Hello Teresa, Thank you for your analysis. One thing to note is that the global materializer materializes the value as a function declaration, not a function definition. As I pasted on my first email, ; Materializable ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable define weak_odr void @foo(%1*) unnamed_addr #7 comdat($comdat1) align 2 personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0 {} is material...

I’m current debugging one of my LLVM passes which utilized inline assembly. I constantly encounter crashes related to “value materialization”, according to the error messages I received. It seems a big concept in LLVM (or maybe generally in compilation), but I cannot find any document that is comprehensive enough to help me understand what exactly materialization is for. Could someone offer some pointers to useful materials int...

...value. ModuleSummaryIndex::getOriginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is still appended to the expected original name. Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function is called to create a global variable in the destination module that corresponds to SGV. I found that ne...

Hello, What is the best material(book, pdfs, ...) for programmers, who have extensive experience in other programming languages, to learn R programming? I think there are many materials on how to use R for specific statistical jobs, but I haven't seen any material particularly designed for R programming. Thanks.

...iginalNameBeforePromote attempts to get the > original name by stripping .llvm.{HASH}, but what I observe is that ".1" is > still appended to the expected original name. > > > > Then where this extra ".1" comes from? It is appended when the global > value is materialized. IRLinker::materialize function calls > IRLinker::linkGlobalValueProto function, and inside that function if DGV is > nullptr or ShouldLink is true then IRLinker::copyGlobalValueProto function > is called to create a global variable in the destination module that > corresponds to...

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com> wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > Thank you for your analysis. One thing to note is that the global > materializer materializes the value as a function declaration, not a > function definition. As I pasted on my first email, > > > > ; Materializable > > ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable > > define weak_odr void @foo(%1*) unnamed_addr #7 comdat($comdat1) align 2 > personality...

...pied during linking. Previously on one of our products, we would lazily load our runtime module (around 9000 functions), and link some user module into this (which is in all practical use cases much smaller). Then, post linking, we have a pass that runs over the module and rips out all the un-materialized functions that weren't being used in the original user module. I only just noticed that LinkModules has a flags parameter that can take a LinkOnlyNeeded flag, which made me wonder if I could reverse the link order (EG. link from the lazily loaded runtime module into the user module),...