search for: masks

...tedMask.size() == 16 && "Unexpected repeated mask size!"); if (V2.isUndef()) { return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::PSHUFD_P64, DL, MVT::v64i32, V1, getV16X86ShuffleImm64ForMask(/*Repeated*/Mask, DL, DAG)); } // Use dedicated unpack instructions for masks that match their pattern. if (SDValue V = lowerVectorShuffleWithUNPCK(DL, MVT::v64i32, Mask, V1, V2, DAG)) return V; } // Try to use shift instructions. if (SDValue Shift = lowerVectorShuffleAsShift(DL, MVT::v64i32, V1, V2, Mask,...

...t do I use for a decision? For my data set I have p.value of 0.05496421 returned from the shapiro.test and 0.882027 returned from the jarque.bera.test. I have included the data set below. Thank you. Kevin "Category","Period","Residual" "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",1/1/2005,-0.449735723758323 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",2/1/2005,0.281461045050074 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",3/1/2005,0.591383050911335 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",4/1/2005,0.239998659520616 "CHILD HATS, WIGS & MASKS",5/1/2005,0.003438794...

libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 4 + libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie_as.c | 7 ++ test/image/Makefile.am | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++ test/image/clip-change-backward-5.swf |binary test/image/clip-change-backward-5.swf.png |binary test/image/clip-change-backward-6.swf |binary

I have a logon script for windows clients to preform net time w/my samba server when they logon. The script is called gerry.bat and it is located in the logon directory. But, when any user logs on.... The script is never called. I've attached my smb.conf file. (by the way Im running RH6.0 on an AMD K-7 w/Samba 2.0.5a. THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!! # Samba config file created using SWAT # from

I'm doing some string manipulation on a vector of file names, and noticed something curious. When I strsplit the vector, I get a list of character vectors. The list is numbered, as lists are. When I cast that list as a data frame with 'as.data.frame()', the resulting columns have names derived from the original filenames. Example code is below. My question is, where are these names

On 11/6/20 12:39 PM, Sjoerd Meijer wrote: Hello Simon, Thanks for your replies, very useful. And yes, thanks for the example and making the target differences clear: ; Some examples: ; RISC-V V & VE(*): ; %mask = (splat i1 1) ; %evl = min(256, %n - %i) ; MVE/SVE : ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %n) ; %evl = call @llvm.vscale() ; AVX: ; %mask = icmp (%i + (seq

I am still fighting with this issue. I did the following: I connected to the NAS with a read-only account called kodi. I traversed various folders and I finally opened an image. Everything went fine. Looking at the logs, the get_entry mask file only shows the final folder: smbd_dirptr_get_entry mask=[Anhelina Viber] found Users/luca/Pictures/Canon/Alessandro/Amici/Anhelina Viber fname=Anhelina

...6 0xff \ match u16 0x1a00 0x1a0f at 22 \ flowid 1:10 eth1 egress to the LAN (eth1 is the internal interface): tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2: protocol ip prio 0 u32 \ match ip protocol 6 0xff \ match u16 0x1a00 0x1a0f at 20 \ flowid 2:10 Now, to further verify that these bit masks do indeed work, I used a simple C app that I have had for several years now to do the verification. Here is the output from this C app: (Be sure to view this in a fixed width font so that everything lines up correctly) Start: 6655 End: 6675 6655 masked by 6671: 6159 Bit Field: 000110011...

Dear Sirs, we're having some inconviniences on files used in a private system, developed to "suit" the company. this system's files are located in /var/wsystems and permissions are granted 4777 acordingly to all files. When we start up and work in this system with ONE user alone, we have no problems whatsoever... however when we start up the whole intranet in this system, most

Dear Sirs, we're having some inconviniences on files used in a private system, developed to "suit" the company. this system's files are located in /var/wsystems and permissions are granted 4777 acordingly to all files. When we start up and work in this system with ONE user alone, we have no problems whatsoever... however when we start up the whole intranet in this system, most

Information for this was gathered from nvdisasm. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Entirely untested. Ben, do you think you'll be able to give this a shot? .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_gk110.cpp | 33 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_gk110.cpp

On 11/6/20 8:49 AM, Roger Ferrer Ibáñez wrote: Hi Sjoerd, Trying to remember how everything fits together here, but could get.active.lane.mask not create the %mask of the VP intrinsics? Or in other words, in the vectoriser, who's producing the %mask and %evl that is consumed by the VP intrinsics? I'm not sure what would be the best way here. I think about the Loop Vectorizer. I imagine

This is a new one to me... Drivers install fine, but on some of the printers I get the "test page failed to print" message. I'm getting nothing in the samba logs from the workstation, smbd, nor from the cups logs. I've googled myself silly, but can only find other people asking the same or similar question. Some of them have found permissions to be the problem, but in

Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I spent some time chatting with Adam about this and have a better > understanding of his concerns here. It seems to me that if having > masking intrinsics is the long-term solution we want, we should do > that now (for add and sub) rather than building arbitrary matrix > layout info into

All, Looking for some help here. Not finding anything on the net that looks the same as what I'm seeing. Running Solaris 10 Sparc, on a Sunfire 5220, 16Gb of RAM. Samba version 3.4.5 and using ZFS file systems with user quotas. All cifs clients shares to this server freeze after about 10 to 15 minutes of connectivity. Only fix is to restart samba. I'm not getting any errors

hi guys my samba share has inherit acls = Yes and inherits(I guess) from global: create mask = 0744 directory mask = 0755 Now, share's underlying filesystem has acls set on a folder: user::rwx user:me:rwx user:appmgr:r-x group::--- mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:me:rwx default:user:appmgr:r-x default:group::--- default:mask::rwx default:other::--- In shell when I

Introduction ========== We would like to add support for masked vector signed/unsigned integer division and remainder in the LLVM IR by introducing new target-independent intrinsics. This follows similar work which was done already for masked vector loads and stores - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/078059.html. Another relevant reference is the masked scatter/gather

...i64>* %indices ; load a vector of indices %vp = gep <2 x f32*> %base, <2 x i64> %vi ; compute an address vector %vx = load <2 x f32*> %vp ; gather This is significantly less ugly than a build-it-yourself gather, and would be much friendlier to masks (below) than the "individually extract each i1 from the mask" approach. Note that this wouldn't support multiple alignments or multiple address spaces in a single gather/scatter. Similarly, volatile would be all-or-nothing. These don't seem like show-stoppers though. This would...

; RISC-V V & VE(*): ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %i) ; %evl = min(256, %n - %i) ; MVE/SVE/AVX : ; %mask = get.active.lane.mask(%i, %n) ; %evl = call @llvm.vscale() For VE, we want to do as much predication as possible through %evl and as little as possible with %mask. This has performance implications on VE and RISC-V - VE does not generate a mask from %evl but %evl is

...you look just at the case where every instruction in a given use-def sub-dag uses the same mask, adding that mask as an operand to all of them is largely just duplicating the information about them all being connected. This is the common case that applymask is aimed at. In the case where multiple masks are used, applymask can still cope, but the neat thing is that in this case it serves to mark the dataflow edges where masks change. > You need some > kind of use-def information for the masks themselves because at some > point they need to be register-allocated. What I'm talking ab...