Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "marka".
Did you mean:
mark
2019 May 28
2
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:01 +0200 Denis Cardon <dcardon at tranquil.it> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > Because of other issues using ADUC, I tried to remove a domain member using:
> >
> >> samba-tool group removemembers "Domain Computers" MARKA\$
> > Removed members from group Domain Computers
> >
> > As shown, it say it "Removed members", but ...
> >
> >> samba-tool group listmembers "Domain Computers"
> > :
> > LABRAT$
> > :
> > OHPRSSTORAGE$
> > MARKA$
&...
2019 May 30
2
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
...[../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:1071]
gensec_update_done: spnego[0x55f94bc71ea0]: NT_STATUS_OK
tevent_req[0x55f94bc782b0/../auth/gensec/spnego.c:1601]: state[2] error[0 (0x0)] state[struct
gensec_spnego_update_state (0x55f94bc78440)] timer[(nil)] finish[../auth/gensec/spnego.c:2070]
dn: CN=MARKA,CN=Computers,DC=hprs,DC=local
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: user
objectClass: computer
cn: MARKA
instanceType: 4
whenCreated: 20190528190119.0Z
uSNCreated: 32525
name: MARKA
objectGUID: e3c5785e-91fc-4ac3-9988-10c007aaf458
userAccountControl: 40...
2019 May 27
4
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
Because of other issues using ADUC, I tried to remove a domain member using:
> samba-tool group removemembers "Domain Computers" MARKA\$
Removed members from group Domain Computers
As shown, it say it "Removed members", but ...
> samba-tool group listmembers "Domain Computers"
:
LABRAT$
:
OHPRSSTORAGE$
MARKA$
:
COMMON$
:
listmembers still shows the computer as a member of "Domain Computers". Wha...
2007 Sep 01
4
[Bug 1356] New: X11 forwarding broken.
...forwarding broken.
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.5p1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: marka at isc.org
Created an attachment (id=1343)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1343)
X11 bind(2) error handling.
I was testing FreeBSD 6-STABLE with no IPv4 interfaces configured.
I was unable to forward X11 in this configuration.
The reason it failed was that IPv4 was the la...
2019 May 28
0
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
Hai,
Can you post the output of :
ldbsearch --show-binary -H ldap://YOURDCNAME_HERE "(&(objectClass=computer)(sAMAccountName=MARKA$))" -k yes | grep -v '#' | grep -v 'ref:'
(https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11482)
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Denis Cardon via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 28 mei...
2019 May 28
1
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
...those guesses work. Suggestion?
--Mark
On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:38:45 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote:
>
> Hai,
>
> Can you post the output of :
> ldbsearch --show-binary -H ldap://YOURDCNAME_HERE "(&(objectClass=computer)(sAMAccountName=MARKA$))" -k yes | grep -v '#' | grep -v 'ref:'
> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11482)
>
>
> Greetz,
>
> Louis
>
>
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> >...
2019 May 28
0
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
Hi Mark,
> Because of other issues using ADUC, I tried to remove a domain member using:
>
>> samba-tool group removemembers "Domain Computers" MARKA\$
> Removed members from group Domain Computers
>
> As shown, it say it "Removed members", but ...
>
>> samba-tool group listmembers "Domain Computers"
> :
> LABRAT$
> :
> OHPRSSTORAGE$
> MARKA$
> :
> COMMON$
> :
>
> listmembers st...
2019 May 28
0
samba-tool group removemembers, not working
...ould even begin since,
> well, this *is* a Domain Computer. I've included my list of groups (samba-tool group list)
> below. Do you have a suggestion where a domain member computer might really be? I've done a
> listmembers of each of these groups and the only one in which I find MARKA is "Domain
> Computers".
>
Hi Mark, can I ask just what you are trying to achieve ?
When you join a computer to the domain a computer object is created in
cn=Computers,dc=whatever,dc=yourdomain,dc=is
If you examine an object for a computer you will find that there is this:
prima...
2013 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: Change of release tarball. Yes, again.
...; Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
> Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
> Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
> Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
...#39;t know how many times I've cut a release to only
find that BIND doesn't build in a particular build environment
despite using build farm and doing release candidates.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: Change of release tarball. Yes, again.
..._____________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
2013 Jan 14
3
[LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: Change of release tarball. Yes, again.
> I'm confused. Does the release tarball now match RELEASE_32/final or
> not? If not, that's a problem for those of us who count on the
> repository matching the actual release.
>
> At the very least they should match so we can check out the release at
> some point in the future.
They should match now
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and
2013 Jan 17
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
...a problem for any LLVMRM. It is an old
lesson re-learned yet again, do not try to wear too many hats
and get the community involved in the release.
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
Thank you for taking time to write this message, reading it helped
restore some sanity in a way that winking smileys didn't seem to.
Paweł
2013 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: Change of release tarball. Yes, again.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:25:42AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> While the sizes now match the SHA256 checksum do not match the original
> compressed tarballs.
>
> /usr/ports/devel/llvm # sha256 /usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
> SHA256 (/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) = 265109c71b4fab8dc12ced314955921695c1ef549719553b0bc1e325110e143e
> root at
2013 Oct 01
1
sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe00c7223498: Listen queue overflow
Hello,
I updated our main server to 9.2-STABLE today and afterwards I noticed a
bunch of these messages, does anyone know what they mean? I was unable
to find anything on this error message. Things appear to be working OK
so far.
Sep 30 22:08:56 illidan kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe00c7223498:
Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance
Sep 30 22:12:27 illidan kernel:
2012 May 30
29
Why Are You Using FreeBSD?
Hi Everyone,
This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users.
I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to
2007 Jan 30
1
What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ?
http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.4
SECURITY ADVISORIES
* CVE-2006-4095
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#915404
NISCC 172003
* CVE-2006-4096
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#697164
NISCC 172003
* CAN-2005-0034
NISCC-UNIRAS 20050125-00059
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#938617
[ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich
2006 Oct 24
0
incorrect number of subscriptions error in user-written function
I have written a function which returns an "incorrect number of
subscriptions error" and am unable to identify why this should happen.
Any help would be gratefully received.
The problem:
I would like to generate combinations/permutations across different
selections - for example all the combinations of "3 chosen from 6"
combined with "5 chosen from 8" combined with
2004 Apr 28
2
openssh continues to process dash arguements after hostname
Processing dash arguments after the hostname is inconsistant with
getopt() usage. It is also inconsistant with other ssh/rsh
implementations. It is also not documented.
openssh accepts treats "ssh host -l user" as "ssh -l user host"
when infact it should be attemption to execute "-l user" on "host"
as the original user.
It looks like someone wanted to