llvm dev - Jan 2013 - [LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: Change of release tarball. Yes, again.

> I'm confused.  Does the release tarball now match RELEASE_32/final or
> not?  If not, that's a problem for those of us who count on the
> repository matching the actual release.
>
> At the very least they should match so we can check out the release at
> some point in the future.
They should match now

--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

While the sizes now match the SHA256 checksum do not match the original
compressed tarballs.

/usr/ports/devel/llvm # sha256 /usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
SHA256 (/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) =
265109c71b4fab8dc12ced314955921695c1ef549719553b0bc1e325110e143e
root at sex:/usr/ports/devel/llvm # ls -l
/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  12275252 15 Jan 08:21
/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
/usr/ports/devel/llvm # cat distinfo 
SHA256 (llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) =
125090c4d26740f1d5e9838477c931ed7d9ad70d599ba265f46f3a42cb066343
SIZE (llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) = 12275252
root at sex:/usr/ports/devel/llvm # 


In message <CA+Ov9+md=gvYhG5A9yUnRsPKMTmEsRZa-8Vn5C28wy0DCC97Lw at
mail.gmail.com>
, Anton Korobeynikov writes:
> > I'm confused.  Does the release tarball now match RELEASE_32/final
or
> > not?  If not, that's a problem for those of us who count on the
> > repository matching the actual release.
> >
> > At the very least they should match so we can check out the release at
> > some point in the future.
> They should match now
> 
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:25:42AM +1100, Mark Andrews
wrote:
> While the sizes now match the SHA256 checksum do not match the original
> compressed tarballs.
They do here.

Joerg

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:25:42AM +1100, Mark Andrews
wrote:
> 
> While the sizes now match the SHA256 checksum do not match the original
> compressed tarballs.
> 
> /usr/ports/devel/llvm # sha256 /usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
> SHA256 (/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) =
265109c71b4fab8dc12ced314955921695c1ef549719553b0bc1e325110e143e
> root at sex:/usr/ports/devel/llvm # ls -l
/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  12275252 15 Jan 08:21
/usr/ports/distfiles/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
> /usr/ports/devel/llvm # cat distinfo 
> SHA256 (llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) =
125090c4d26740f1d5e9838477c931ed7d9ad70d599ba265f46f3a42cb066343
> SIZE (llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) = 12275252
> root at sex:/usr/ports/devel/llvm # 
  Here is mine,

$ wget http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
$ sha256 llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
SHA256 (llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz) =
125090c4d26740f1d5e9838477c931ed7d9ad70d599ba265f46f3a42cb066343
$ ls -l llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 chenwj  wheel  12275252  1 15 05:21 llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz

  Are you sure the tarball is the right one downloaded from the website?

Regards,
chenwj

-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj