search for: marinas

Some people on these lists may be interested in these positions at Google. Please contact Marina directly if you're interested. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ Begin forwarded message: > Hi Vikram, > > My name is Marina Moreno. I'm an Engineering Sourcer at Google in > the Platforms staffing group. I came across your resume on the >

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Some people on these lists may be interested in these positions at Google. > Please contact Marina directly if you're interested. Are these job postings llvm-related? If not, they are off topic for this list. Thanks, -Chris > > Begin forwarded message: > >> Hi Vikram, >> >> My name is Marina Moreno. I'm

Some targets don't have the problem because they prefix all names with an undercore. Apart from that I am not aware of any solution to the problem of keywords clashing with variable names in intel syntax. - Matthias > On Jul 23, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > So, there is no prior art for escaping the name of a global symbol with the same name

Microsoft assembler treats mov to EAX as a register, even if there is a global memory also named EAX – meaning the register takes precedence. But here I have a bit of a different situation – I have a global variable, which name happens to match an implicit register or a register that does not exist in the current arch, just in future ones. Microsoft assembler treats these cases as memory

So, there is no prior art for escaping the name of a global symbol with the same name as a register? If there is, I'd rather we just implement it and leave it at that. We can probably fix the 'flags' case easily in LLVM, but I'd rather not bend over backwards to make ZMM0 be a global name when AVX is disabled. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Yatsina, Marina <marina.yatsina at

Linux kernel is using the “asm goto” feature, other projects probably use it as well. I think it provides motivation to support it in LLVM. Regarding the complexity, I believe there is some infrastructure that we can at least partially reuse (the support for “indirectbr” instruction). My focus is adding “asm goto” support, the other things are indeed completely orthogonal and came up in bugs

Recientemente me intalaron la plataforma Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit). He intentado instalar el paquete dplR tanto desde el cran como desde un archivo y me da el siguiente error: ERROR: dependency ?XML? is not available for package ?dplR? Esto se debe a la versión de Linux que tengo instalada? gracias -- Ana Marina Srur Departamento de Dendrocronología e Historia Ambiental

Network Operations Specialist The University of Southern California (USC), founded in 1880, is the largest private employer in the City of Los Angeles and proud recipient of Time Magazine's College of the Year 2000. USC offers competitive pay and an outstanding benefits package. **PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS POSITION IS LOCATED IN Marina del Rey, California** The USC Viterbi School of

Hi When I try and login as a domain user called s3: su MARINA\\s3 I get: Kerberos: AS-REQ MARINAs3 at HH3.SITE from ipv4:192.168.1.2:50945 for krbtgt/HH3.SITE at HH3.SITE Kerberos: UNKNOWN -- MARINAs3 at HH3.SITE: no such entry found in hdb Kerberos is not seeing the winbind separator. So I try winbind separator = + wbinfo -i s3 MARINA+s3:*:3000028:20513::/home/MARINA/s3:/bin/bash getent pa...

Asm goto feature was introduces to GCC in order to optimize the support for tracepoints in Linux kernel (it can be used for other things that do nop patching). GCC documentation describes their motivating example here: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.4/gcc/Extended-Asm.html #define TRACE1(NUM) \ do { \

Suppose I have a global variable named 'EAX'. How do Intel assemblers normally escape register names to access such a global variable? On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Yatsina, Marina <marina.yatsina at intel.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I’ve encountered an issue with x86 Intel asm syntax when using certain > variable names. > > > > If you look at

Hi Rotem, Thank to you, and especially to Marina! The problem gone. I'm a bit interested, what is the reason it worked in Win7, and not in Win8. I've recently used Process Explorer to discover, that the call was to ntdll.dll, which in Win8 is loaded to the totally different address. Best regards, Victor Milovanov Moscow State University graduate student 2012/3/3 Rotem, Nadav

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 9:15 AM, Yatsina, Marina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > What is the best way to model a scheduler for a VLIW in-order architecture? > I’ve looked at the Hexagon and R600 architectures and they are using itineraries. I wanted to understand the benefit in using itineraries over the per operand scheduling. > > I

Hi all, I've encountered an issue with x86 Intel asm syntax when using certain variable names. If you look at the following example, where I try to do a mov to a memory location named "flags2", llvm- mc works fine: >cat test_good.s mov eax, flags2 >llvm-mc.exe -x86-asm-syntax=intel test_good.s -o - .text movl flags2, %eax But if the memory location is

Hola, tengo un script para usar la función POSIXct y lo corro en otras computadoras con otras versiones de R y no tengo problemas ahora cuando lo corro en mi maquina donde tengo la versión 3.1.3 no me da ningun error pero genera una nueva columna con NA puede ser sólo problema de la versión de R? gracias ana -- Ana Marina Srur Departamento de Dendrocronología e Historia Ambiental

Hi, What is the best way to model a scheduler for a VLIW in-order architecture? I've looked at the Hexagon and R600 architectures and they are using itineraries. I wanted to understand the benefit in using itineraries over the per operand scheduling. I also found this thread from almost 2 years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098763.html At that time it seemed the

On Windows, the LLVM JIT runner looks for the '_chkstk' symbol by enumerating all of the loaded DLLs. On Win8, NTDLL.DLL (where _chkstk is defined) is found in a location that is more than 32bits bytes away from the jitted code. Marina's patch changes the code that generates a call to '_chkstk' from PCREL32 (which uses a 32bit offset) to an indirect call (which uses a 64bit

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM Yatsina, Marina via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Asm goto feature was introduces to GCC in order to optimize the support > for tracepoints in Linux kernel (it can be used for other things that do > nop patching). > > > > GCC documentation describes their motivating example here: > > >

On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 11:38:40AM +0000, Maximilian Heyne wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 05:28:25PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:17:16PM +0000, Maximilian Heyne wrote: > > > With the recent removal of vm_dev from devres its memory is only freed > > > via the callback virtio_mmio_release_dev. However, this only takes > > > effect after device_add is called...

On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 11:38:40AM +0000, Maximilian Heyne wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 05:28:25PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:17:16PM +0000, Maximilian Heyne wrote: > > > With the recent removal of vm_dev from devres its memory is only freed > > > via the callback virtio_mmio_release_dev. However, this only takes > > > effect after device_add is called...