search for: mainstreamed

switching or adding? Dave St John Mediacast1 Administration (720) 641-7586 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Payne" <speedwolf@door.net> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 7:12 PM Subject: Re: [icecast] OT: OGG in the mainstream <p>> AAC + I believe is correct. > > Bryan > > > ---- Original Message ----- > From:

Devik, Can you send Htb to Marcello Please? Its only a module, but its about time it went mainstream. Maybe its too late for 2.4.19, but 2.4.20 will come. Same comment for IMQ also. Regards John

I think when the real-time cbr encoding issues are sorted Vorbis (this is my experience with oddcast dsp, winamp and icecast 2 win32, big cpu hog) will start gaining more ground, also I think it will also gain more ground when it starts getting implemented into the more mainstream software and hardware products. For the most part vbr mp3 (btw, provide mp3's for downloads as vbr.. Better

As part of a project to clarify what behaviour of C implementations is actually relied upon in modern practice, and what behaviour is guaranteed by current mainstream implementations, we recently distributed a survey of 15 questions about C, https://goo.gl/AZXH3S. We were asking what C is in current mainstream practice: the behaviour that programmers assume they can rely on, the behaviour

Why Ruby on Rails won''t become mainstream http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000382.html Kind of interesting, but didn''t convince me. Though, yeah, I can imagine a lot of naive programmers sticking with PHP and VB (the type of crowd that also doesn''t run their own servers, so they''re dependent on hosts offering Rails for them). Rails DOES have an IDE - soon

gtgbr@gmx.net wrote: > My guess is that Shoutcast gets Ogg Vorbis support when hell > freezes over. Don't quote me but I believe Shoutcast is switching to MPEG-4 AAC later this year. Ross. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'

Are we likely to see patches to allow 16TB ext3 in the mainstream kernel any time soon? I am working with a storage box that has 16x750GB drives RAID5-ed together to create a potential 10.5TB of potential storage. But because ext3 is limited to 8TB I am forced to split into 2 smaller ext3 filesystems which is really cumbersome for my app. Any ideas anybody?

Hmm... The Mac makefiles are beginning to get really out of date in the mainstream ogg and vorbis trees. As a mtter of fact, there aren't any Mac makefiles in the ogg tree. I can make an attempt to update them, but I'm not very good at library work (exported symbols confuse the hell out of me), or if Chris is listening, I'm making a request for an update... please? Thanks,

I know there's a couple third party repos offering PHP 7 for Centos. I prefer not to add too much third party that I don't have to and PHP 7 has been mainstream for some time now, I thought maybe it would be in EPEL by now. What is the most recommended and stable way to get an up to date PHP on Centos 7?

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Silva" <chisophugis at gmail.com> > To: "Peter Sewell" <Peter.Sewell at cl.cam.ac.uk> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 4:53:30 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] C as used/implemented in practice: analysis of responses > > > > All of these seem to fall into the pattern of

Dear R Developers, First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will benefit a lot from his work. However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance:

User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome addition. I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data immensely. They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 9:42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear

No. Garage full of wood and tools collecting dust. Isn''t that the definition of "hobby" ? Peter J. Fitzgibbons Applications Manager Lakewood Homes - "The American Dream Builder"(r) Peter.Fitzgibbons-STCS76aLmhk1y/cD6r8xzl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org (847) 884-8800 -----Original Message----- From: rails-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org

So as long as I can read, OpenBlas, for Windows, might be a worth considering option: http://www.openblas.net But Intel MKL also seems to be free*: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/free-mkl Thank you, Juan El 30/10/2017 6:45 p. m., "Avraham Adler" <avraham.adler at gmail.com> escribi?: > [Sent offlist accidentally] > > What concerns me first and foremost is

I am wondering what the list's opinion is on the Apple to Intel switch. This is going to put a slick desktop that runs on top of BSD directly into the mainstream. What does this hold for Linux in general, Linux on the desktop..and microsoft. -- Computer House Calls, Networks, Security, Web Design: http://www.emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com What businesses are in Brunswick, Maryland?

On 29 October 2017 at 22:01, Kenny Bell wrote: | User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome | addition. | | I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data | immensely. | | They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to | development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. With all due respect: You may

Hi All, if memory serves me well I recall some paper comparing the relative success in getting mainstream acceptance (as mainstream as statistics can be) of both R and Octave. I remember vaguely that the fact the development strategies (core team vs one main developer) played a major role in the relative success of the two programs. I tried to find this paper, but my goggle skills are failing

[Sent offlist accidentally] What concerns me first and foremost is that the licensure would have to be ironclad (including for commercial use like vanilla R now) as well as ensuring that R remains completely FLOSS. Anything ?added? to R has to be a no-strings-attached gift to R. Also, I would think that it would have to play nice with existing workflows (like OpenBLAS instead of MKL) unless

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:06:03AM +1200, Ross Levis wrote: > Mark Casey wrote: > > I think when the real-time cbr encoding issues are sorted > > Vorbis (this is my experience with oddcast dsp, winamp and > > icecast 2 win32, big cpu hog) will start gaining more ground, > > I can't use the managed bitrate option in OddCast on my K6II-500 CPU! > (Overclocked to

I checked the list of what not to use, but am still having no fun trying to find a working box. Can someone suggest a Compaq or Dell or MPC or . any other brand and model that is known to work well with the TE411P ? Will an old Proliant do? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: