search for: mailbodi

Hi, I have a strange problem with sieve. After upgrading to 2.2.13 sieve seems to break the mailbody during automatic redirection. I have the following configuration. - User A sends mail to User B. - User B has an automatic redirect to User C - User C geht the mailbody broken I did some debugging. This is a part of the mailbody which i grabbed from the mailqueue before the mail gets

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

Hi, On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. > Download this: > http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz I think that is the same tarball I used before. > Let me know if that doesn't work. Again: there is no fixheader-script like you

>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. > > Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. > >> Download this: >> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz > > I think that is the same tarball I used before. Ok. I'm confused. Do you want llvm-gcc3 or llvm-gcc4? The tarball above is a binary for llvm-gcc4 for Mac x86. You

Hello, for many years i used an mailserver with dovecot V1 very satisfied! http://mailserver.decotrain.de/ One of the reasons to use dovecot was a simply configuration. Dovecot was the best choice for IMAP for me! Now i updated the server to Debian testing with dovecot 2.1.7. It's not possible for me to get a running authentication for virtual mail users! I recently found this mailing and

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD >> >> why do you want the burden of

we have ORACLE 10.2.0.4 with CENTOS 4.4 on DELL server.? Recently we are test "UTL_SMTP" on ORACLE PL?SQL program and tried to send MAIL to customers. ? The problem is this send MAIL program always one time work and second time not work (loop).? I don't think problem come from ORACLE bug or any ORACLE relate problem.? If I copy database and put on anyother server, it work correctly.

On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > >>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. >> >> Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. >> >>> Download this: >>> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz >> >> I think that is the same tarball I used before. > > Ok. I'm

> I wanted to install llvm 1.8 and the frontend at my MacBook Pro but I > think the gcc4 frontend doesn't work (gcc3 and llvm 1.8 works fine on > my old ppc-based mac). There are no fixheaders-script and no include > directories ... > Are there working gcc 4 binaries? Did I miss some informations on the > llvm-webpage? > Or do I have to build my own gcc frontend? I assume

Hi, I wanted to install llvm 1.8 and the frontend at my MacBook Pro but I think the gcc4 frontend doesn't work (gcc3 and llvm 1.8 works fine on my old ppc-based mac). There are no fixheaders-script and no include directories ... Are there working gcc 4 binaries? Did I miss some informations on the llvm-webpage? Or do I have to build my own gcc frontend? Thank you Nico

Thank you for your helpful hints on debugging this issue. I wanted first to get the mail which generates this error but unfortunately the user already deleted it as well from his trash. Now I got another hint and it looks like this mail had a big attachment to it. Is it possible that spamc generated this error due to the size of the mail? Regards ML On Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:29 AM,