Displaying 20 results from an estimated 41 matches for "magny".
Did you mean:
magno
1999 Jun 30
1
grid command
I'd like to know if there is a way to plot your stuff and have a grid on
the plot, in which
the grid falls exactly where it should, i.e. on the axis labels.
E.g., if on x axis I have the labels -4,-2,0,2,4 and on y
-1,-0.5,0,0.5,1
the command grid(5,5) puts the grid out of place, just on 0 it falls
right.
Any hint?
Thanks
Alessandro Magni
--
2011 Dec 08
3
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
It is my understanding that all you need to do is specify let isTarget = 1 in your .td file and it will generate target specific intrinsics. This should allow you to keep the IntrinsicsPTX.td file in the same location.
Micah
From: Justin Holewinski [mailto:justin.holewinski at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 6:13 AM
To: Alberto Magni
Cc: Villmow, Micah; LLVM Developers Mailing List
2011 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote:
> It is my understanding that all you need to do is specify let isTarget =
> 1 in your .td file and it will generate target specific intrinsics. This
> should allow you to keep the IntrinsicsPTX.td file in the same location.
>
So we keep the intrinsics defined in include/llvm/IntrinsicsPTX.td?
2011 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
Hi Justin,
sorry for the delay, I have been busy.
Micah's proposal requires to move the definitions of the intrinsics
from include/llvm/IntrinsicsPTX.td to lib/Target/PTX/PTXIntrinsics.td
thus allowing the generation of the file PTXGenIntrinsics.inc which
will be included by PTXIntrinsicInfo.cpp.
This is a quite big modification, do you agree with this ?
Or do you have a better solution.
2011 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Nov 23, 2011 6:57 AM, "Alberto Magni" <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>
wrote:
> > Alberto,
> > The AMDIL backend solves your problem with intrinsic overloading this
way:
> > def int_AMDIL_mad : GCCBuiltin<"__amdil_mad">, TernaryIntFloat;
>
2011 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> sorry for the delay, I have been busy.
>
> Micah's proposal requires to move the definitions of the intrinsics
> from include/llvm/IntrinsicsPTX.td to lib/Target/PTX/PTXIntrinsics.td
> thus allowing the generation of the file PTXGenIntrinsics.inc which
> will be
2011 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
Alberto,
The AMDIL backend solves your problem with intrinsic overloading this way:
def int_AMDIL_mad : GCCBuiltin<"__amdil_mad">, TernaryIntFloat;
Where TernaryIntFloat is defined as:
class TernaryIntFloat :
Intrinsic<[llvm_anyfloat_ty], [LLVMMatchType<0>,
LLVMMatchType<0>, LLVMMatchType<0>], []>;
This allows us to write a
2011 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alberto Magni
<alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Justin Holewinski
> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Magni <
> alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Justin,
> >>
> >> attached you find
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Nov 23, 2011 8:33 AM, "Justin Holewinski" <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2011 6:57 AM, "Alberto Magni" <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>
wrote:
> > > Alberto,
> > > The AMDIL backend solves your problem
1999 May 12
0
R manual - S manual
I just started working on R, and lacking a manual I saw that the advice
is to use som S or S-plus manual.
Where can I find it online?
P.S. I already downloaded and read "notes on S-plus" by Venables/Smith:
now I'd need something
deeper.
P.P.S. please, reply even by email to magni at omega.ien.it
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ Alessandro
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> Alberto,
> The AMDIL backend solves your problem with intrinsic overloading this way:
> def int_AMDIL_mad : GCCBuiltin<"__amdil_mad">, TernaryIntFloat;
>
> Where TernaryIntFloat is defined as:
> class TernaryIntFloat :
> Intrinsic<[llvm_anyfloat_ty],
2011 Nov 21
1
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> attached you find the patch for the integer max instruction.
> The multiclass PTX_INTRINSIC_INT3 in file PTXIntrinsicInstrInfo.td
> is almost an exact copy of PTX_INT3 in PTXInstrInfo.td, maybe
> a modification of this class can be defined in a separate file.
>
I'm
2011 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Justin Holewinski
<justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Justin Holewinski
>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Magni
>> >
2011 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Justin Holewinski
<justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> attached you find the patch for the integer max instruction.
>> The multiclass PTX_INTRINSIC_INT3 in file PTXIntrinsicInstrInfo.td
>> is almost
2014 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] "Duplicate option categories" assertion triggered loading an LLVM-project
Hello Sergey,
thanks for the suggestion.
The name of the pass is not what triggers the assertion.
The test case I attached to the email is a stripped-down version of a much
more complicated pass
(with a proper name) that originally caused the problem.
Also, to be sure, I just tried to change the name of the pass to something
more significant.
It did not work.
Cheers,
Alberto
On Sun, Aug 10,
2011 Nov 14
1
[LLVMdev] PTX backend fatal error
Justin,
Add this to your TargetLowering constructor, this fixes the mem* issue.
maxStoresPerMemcpy = 4096;
maxStoresPerMemmove = 4096;
maxStoresPerMemset = 4096;
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Holewinski
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:12 AM
To: Alberto Magni
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PTX backend
1999 Jul 01
0
Grid
Many thanks to anybody that helped me (Martin, Paul, Terry): I was badly
in need,
and the axis() method has been the best one.
It is tricky, anyway. Pity the plot/grid commands are not "intelligent"
enough to do the work
themselves...
Best regards
Alessandro
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ Alessandro Magni
/ IEN
1999 Jul 19
1
Using Scompile with R on Linux
I am using R 0.64.2 on Redhat 6.0 Linux and am trying to use R with a
program called Scompile that translates S (or R) code into C code.
Although Scompile has an option for dyn.load.shared, it evidently isn't
exactly equivalent to dyn.load in R, because when compiled using
Scompile, the resulting object causes the complaint by dyn.load that
"ELF file's phentsize not the expected
2011 Nov 16
4
[LLVMdev] PTX builtin functions.
Dear Justin,
I am trying to add the support for some OpenCL builtin functions to
the PTX backend.
The attached file represent the first stub of a patch for the fmax
builtin function.
The test case I am trying is the following:
define ptx_device float @f(float %x, float %y) {
entry:
%z = call float @fmax(float %x, float %y)
ret float %z
}
declare float @fmax(float, float)
But at the moment
2012 Mar 31
1
[LLVMdev] Missing IntelJITEvents and OProfileJIT libs
Hello Daniel,
thank you very much for the clarification.
I confirm that the two libraries showed up without specifying the two
configure flags.
Cheers,
Alberto
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Malea, Daniel <daniel.malea at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> I can confirm the problem you mentioned, and will look at fixing it. You have indeed stumbled on a bug; the two libraries