search for: macheke

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 72 matches for "macheke".

Did you mean: machek
2018 May 29
1
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Fri 2018-05-25 10:00:04, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:14 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > > >
2018 May 25
2
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > > > > > Position Independent Executable
2018 May 25
2
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > > > > > Position Independent Executable
2018 Feb 21
2
Samba 4 domain - Dead groups
Hi *, I'm running a Samba 4 AD DC at home, which works pretty well, except one of my users has "dead" group entries, which cannot be mapped to a group name anymore. This is only for one user. As I'm having problems with idmap of that user, I assume the cause is these groups. Is there any way I can get rid of those? I tried samba-tool dbcheck and ADSI-Edit, with no luck what
2009 Jan 13
28
Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805
2020 Jul 07
3
[RFC]: mm,power: introduce MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND
On Tue 07-07-20 10:07:26, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > This patch adds logic to the kernel power code to zero out contents of > > > > > all MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND VMAs present in the system during its transition > > > > > to any suspend state equal or greater/deeper than Suspend-to-memory, > > > > > known as S3. > > >
2020 Jul 07
3
[RFC]: mm,power: introduce MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND
On Tue 07-07-20 10:07:26, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > This patch adds logic to the kernel power code to zero out contents of > > > > > all MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND VMAs present in the system during its transition > > > > > to any suspend state equal or greater/deeper than Suspend-to-memory, > > > > > known as S3. > > >
2018 Feb 22
0
Samba 4 domain - Dead groups
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:17:54 +0100 Bastian Machek <bm at machek.systems> wrote: > Am 2018-02-21 18:09, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:16:30 +0100 > > Bastian Machek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi *, > >> > >> I'm running a Samba 4 AD DC at home, which works pretty well, >
2018 May 24
2
[PATCH v3 11/27] x86/power/64: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:05, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> Again, was this
2018 May 24
2
[PATCH v3 11/27] x86/power/64: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:05, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> Again, was this
2018 May 25
0
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:14 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > > the
2010 Jan 23
1
2.6.33 vs. NVIDIA GForce GT 220
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:43:35PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I tried enabling staging nvidia driver on GT220, but apparently driver > does not know about it. Unfortunately, I have one of those cards here. > > (I wonder... is there better mailing list? MAINTAINERS only lists > linux-fbdev....) CC'ing proper mailing list
2018 May 24
2
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. What testing did this get? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
2018 May 24
2
[PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support
On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. What testing did this get? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
2016 Oct 25
2
noveau: emergency shutdown handling is overcomplex and broken
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c index b9703c0..adb1deb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c @@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ nvkm_therm_sensor_event(struct nvkm_therm *therm, enum nvkm_therm_thrs thrs, struct work_struct *work; work =
2024 Feb 13
2
[PATCH v2 3/8] fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header
Forward declare struct backlight_device and remove the include statement. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> --- include/linux/fb.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h index 2ce2f5c2fca9a..7380d959c5d53 100644 --- a/include/linux/fb.h +++
2007 May 18
6
2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted
Hi, I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel commandline parameters. Unfortunately, on the next reboot fsck was schedules on my filesystem after 38 clean
2013 Aug 16
1
[PATCH 0/5] Enable Drivers for Intel MIC X100 Coprocessors.
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > Hi! > > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > > > for applications. A key
2013 Aug 16
1
[PATCH 0/5] Enable Drivers for Intel MIC X100 Coprocessors.
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > Hi! > > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > > > for applications. A key
2016 Oct 19
2
[PATCH v2 34/37] docs: fix locations of several documents that got moved
Em Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:34:42 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> escreveu: > Hi! > > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab > > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ Description: > > because of fragmentation, SLUB will retry with the minimum order > > possible depending on its characteristics.