search for: lzma_version_number

...ime ago. LZMA has been replaced by XZ. Do not know why, and do not want to. BUT there is no reliable source for LZMA5 (the XZ project only reports LZMA2 and LZMA4). Please see the wiki at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils Paused for now - awaiting reply > configure:35724: checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma > configure:35757: gcc -maix64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -I/opt/64/include > -I/opt/buildaix/include -O2 -mminimal-toc -I/opt/buildaix/include > -I/opt/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lrt > -ldl -lm -liconv >&5 > configure:35757: $? = 1 >...

...was required if lzma was not available. from the diff of R-3.2.2 and R-devel ## R_TRE @@ -3192,11 +3270,10 @@ ## Try finding liblzma library and headers. ## We check that both are installed, AC_DEFUN([R_LZMA], - [if test "x${use_system_xz}" = xyes; then - AC_CHECK_LIB(lzma, lzma_version_number, [have_lzma=yes], [have_lzma=no]) - if test "${have_lzma}" = yes; then - AC_CHECK_HEADERS(lzma.h, [have_lzma=yes], [have_lzma=no]) - fi + [AC_CHECK_LIB(lzma, lzma_version_number, [have_lzma=yes], [have_lzma=no]) + if test "${have_lzma}" = yes; then + AC_CHECK_HEADERS(l...

I have lzma installed (in /usr/local) but R-3.3.0 configure doesn't like something about it: checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma... yes checking lzma.h usability... no checking lzma.h presence... no checking for lzma.h... no configure: error: "liblzma library and headers are required" bash-3.2$ ls /usr/local/lib/*lzma* ls /usr/local/lib/*lzma* /usr/local/lib/liblzma.5.dylib /usr/local/lib/liblzma.a /...

On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in >> 64.bit mode. > > Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is > little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in > reporting on R-devel where

...:[/data/prj/cran/64/R-devel]./xxx BZ2_version():1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010 And a repeat for lzma it seems... Again, is this really necessary (versus convienent). configure:35706: result: yes configure:35712: checking whether bzip2 support suffices configure:35715: result: no configure:35724: checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma configure:35757: gcc -maix64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -I/opt/64/include -I/opt/buildaix/include -O2 -mminimal-toc -I/opt/buildaix/include -I/opt/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lrt -ldl -lm -liconv >&5 configure:35757: $? = 1 configure: failed program was:...

...er zlib support needs to be compiled... no checking for BZ2_bzlibVersion in -lbz2... yes checking bzlib.h usability... yes checking bzlib.h presence... yes checking for bzlib.h... yes checking if bzip2 version >= 1.0.6... yes checking whether bzip2 support needs to be compiled... no checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma... yes checking lzma.h usability... yes checking lzma.h presence... yes checking for lzma.h... yes checking if lzma version >= 4.999... yes checking for pcre_fullinfo in -lpcre... yes checking pcre.h usability... yes checking pcre.h presence... yes checking for pcre.h... yes checking p...