search for: lumping

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:42:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Each driver calling scsi_ioctl() gets an equivalent compat_ioctl() > handler that implements the same commands by calling scsi_compat_ioctl(). > > The scsi_cmd_ioctl() and scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() functions are compatible > at this point, so any driver that calls those can do so for both native > and compat mode, with

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:42:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Each driver calling scsi_ioctl() gets an equivalent compat_ioctl() > handler that implements the same commands by calling scsi_compat_ioctl(). > > The scsi_cmd_ioctl() and scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() functions are compatible > at this point, so any driver that calls those can do so for both native > and compat mode, with

Sorry about the odd terminology, but I suspect that my intent might be completely missed had I used "aggregate" or "classify" (each of which appears to have some rather special meanings in statistical analysis and modeling). I have some data about software builds; one of the characteristics of each is the name of the branch. A colleague has generated some fairly interesting

...em is the following: I have a data frame (v1) with lots of production data measurements. Each row contains a single measurement ('ARI_MIT') with a timestamp. I want to "lump" the data by months with their mean and standard deviation. I have already successfully managed to do the lumping by adding another column to my data frame: v1$MONTH = strftime(v1$TIMESTAMP, "%y%m") This makes a nice month-wise boxplot of my data, although I don't have an idea why: boxplot(v1$ARI_MIT ~ v1$MONTH) I don't need this plotted, though, but in the form of a new data frame with th...

Hi Everyone, Working on a REST-based web application, and I need some ammo in dealing with my supervisors and contractors. Is it better to: Method 1: Take in one large XML-based POST request, which contains 1st, 2nd and 3rd level elements, and build the associated child and grandchild objects in the parent controller, Method 2: Instead use a number of smaller XML-based POST requests

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:39 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig | 12 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug | 144 +++++++++++------------ > > Please split these out to a separate patch. Can't speak for others,

We need to look at how to support this on ia64, so how about making this an architecture dependent feature for now? Not sure what powerpc needs here, so I''m just lumping it into the old way bucket. Thanks, Alex Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com> --- diff -r 3ac19fda0bc2 tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Fri Mar 02 12:11:52 2007 +0000 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Mon...

Hello, Lutz Donnerhacke implemented DNS-Dampening. http://lutz.donnerhacke.de/eng/Blog/DNS-Dampening The implementation is available as patch for BIND9 only. He told me that there is an other method preferred by the nsd developer. It's called "Response Rate Limiting". May one describe the idea behind rate limiting and compare it with Lutz' solution? Thanks. -- Andreas

Hello, I am having a lot of trouble with my deployment of Asterisk. I am running the PBX-In-a-flash turnkey of Asterisk and ever since deployment I have had many different problems. I have managed to get all issues sorted out as I go along, until this one that randomly began last week. We are using Grandstream GXP 2000 Handsets in the office, and at TE110P card to interface to our ISDN OnRamp10

Hi Fernando, To do this you would need to change the register allocation pass on the fly. I don't think this is currently possible. Someone please correct me if I am wrong. I would like to see hierarchical pass capability built into pass manager. This allows us to group live variables, phi lowering, two- address, lower subreg, live interval analysis, coalescing, allocation, and

Another example would be .debug_pubnames and .debug_pubtypes sections. Currently these default to omitted for Darwin and PS4, but included everywhere else. My initial patch for "tuning" changes the PS4 platform criterion to the SCE debugger predicate; quite likely the "not Darwin" criterion ought to be "not LLDB" or in other words "on for GDB only."

Hi and thanks in advance, I am fairly new with R so I hope this problem isn't too amateur. I have a vector of count data which correspond to vectors of date (%m/%d/%Y) and time of day (%H:%M:%S). I am trying to compute various statistics (e.g. daily max) by lumping the data together by day. I have been able to utilize tapply() and group the counts together, but with the method I use I end up losing the corresponding time of day information. This is what I have done so far data=*vector of integers *hours= *"character" vector of times %H:%M:S% * d...

I have data in a format like this: name ssex sex view num rating rt ahl4 f m f 56 -108 2246 ahl4 f m f 74 85 1444 ahl4 f m f 52 151 1595 ahl4 f m f 85 1 1447 ahl4 f m f 53 46 1716 ahl4 f m f 37 145 1276 ahl4 f m f 50 98 1465 ahl4 f m f 51 -26 1322 ahl4 f m f 38 -97 1790 ahl4 f m f 14 -158 865 ... ahl4 f m p 43 -136 1669 ahl4 f m p 10 -59 808 ahl4 f m p 67 -111 1279 ahl4 f m p 85 -86 994 ahl4 f m

Hey all, is there a simple way to alternate between different register allocators at run time? I would like to decide dynamically which register allocator to use. The decision is based on information that is produced by a pass that executes before register allocation takes place. Is it possible to modify RegisterRegAlloc::Registry to take into consideration this information? Is there

Bill? Wendling wrote: >Also sprach Casey Carter: >} Issue: GraphWriter includes <ostream>, which my gcc2 apparently thinks >} is <ostream.h>. >} Fix: Make a new <Support/ostream> that handles this discrepancy, ala >} <Support/hash_set>. >} >Um...was it entirely necessary to issue *8* email messages to the group >with mostly single-line fixes

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/27/2018 08:21 AM, hw wrote: >> Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> I've never seen anyone actually do this, but there's an article discussing it.? It is noteworthy that this requires enforcement in the client OS, as well as the switch. >> >> The article itself says that what it is describing only works within a >> Windoze world. >

everyone-- I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type handle from a type, rather than vice versa as its name would imply. Should I send a patch to change the name of the function to reflect its type better, or should I just lump it? — j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> http://jhw.vox.com/

On Feb 11, 2010, at 3:15 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 14:44:23 Dan Gohman wrote: > >>> Then we can't use it to hold a non-temporal flag. The operand might be >>> non-temporal in one context but it may not be in another. >> >> Sharing only happens when two instructions have the "same" memory >> reference info. You

On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > On 07/06/2011 07:10 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: >> >>>> There is no need to include any notices in the binaries of an application built with clang, or some with some other application that links to the LLVM runtime libraries that are dual licensed.

In the implementation of the AliasSetTracker, I see LoadInst, StoreInst, and VAArgInst are treated specially. Why aren't AtomicCmpXchgInst and AtomicRMWInst treated with similar care? Lumping together with other unknown instructions seems unnecessarily expensive in compile time. Preston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120119/6e50526f/attachment.html>