search for: lump

...ometry *geo) > > static const struct block_device_operations virtblk_fops = { > .ioctl = virtblk_ioctl, > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > + .compat_ioctl = blkdev_compat_ptr_ioctl, > +#endif > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .getgeo = virtblk_getgeo, > }; Hmm - is virtio blk lumped in with scsi things intentionally? -- MST

...ometry *geo) > > static const struct block_device_operations virtblk_fops = { > .ioctl = virtblk_ioctl, > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > + .compat_ioctl = blkdev_compat_ptr_ioctl, > +#endif > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .getgeo = virtblk_getgeo, > }; Hmm - is virtio blk lumped in with scsi things intentionally? -- MST

...f the characteristics of each is the name of the branch. A colleague has generated some fairly interesting graphs from the data, but he's treating each unique branch as if it were a separate factor. Last I checked, I had 276 unique branches, but these could be aggregated, classified, or "lumped" into about 8 - 10 categories; I believe it would be useful and helpful for me to be able to do precisely that. A facility that could work for this purpose (that that we use in our "continuous build" driver) is the Bourne shell "case" statement. Such a construct might l...

Hi all, I'm just getting started in R. My problem is the following: I have a data frame (v1) with lots of production data measurements. Each row contains a single measurement ('ARI_MIT') with a timestamp. I want to "lump" the data by months with their mean and standard deviation. I have already successfully managed to do the lumping by adding another column to my data frame: v1$MONTH = strftime(v1$TIMESTAMP, "%y%m") This makes a nice month-wise boxplot of my data, although I don't have an idea...

Hi Everyone, Working on a REST-based web application, and I need some ammo in dealing with my supervisors and contractors. Is it better to: Method 1: Take in one large XML-based POST request, which contains 1st, 2nd and 3rd level elements, and build the associated child and grandchild objects in the parent controller, Method 2: Instead use a number of smaller XML-based POST requests

...nfig | 12 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug | 144 +++++++++++------------ > > Please split these out to a separate patch. Can't speak for others, but > the patch looks like it'll be conflicts galore and a problem to manage > if merged in one big lump. Yes, it would be nice to have the amd patch separate as well. Alex > > BR, > Jani. > > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lis...

We need to look at how to support this on ia64, so how about making this an architecture dependent feature for now? Not sure what powerpc needs here, so I''m just lumping it into the old way bucket. Thanks, Alex Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com> --- diff -r 3ac19fda0bc2 tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Fri Mar 02 12:11:52 2007 +0000 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py...

Hello, Lutz Donnerhacke implemented DNS-Dampening. http://lutz.donnerhacke.de/eng/Blog/DNS-Dampening The implementation is available as patch for BIND9 only. He told me that there is an other method preferred by the nsd developer. It's called "Response Rate Limiting". May one describe the idea behind rate limiting and compare it with Lutz' solution? Thanks. -- Andreas

...ed things such as a carrier fault, bad network wiring (even more possible as we are using PoE), even badly configured QoS. However things being as they are my boss has taken it upon himself to absolve himself of any possible blame for any system that he manages (everything but the asterisk box) and lumped it all on me in such a way that its basically my job if i cannot get this working. With all of this, i need to do everything i can to rule out the Asterisk box, so i can go back to him with confidence and clear asterisk of any wrongdoing. Has anyone here ever heard of this sort of problem, and i...

...val analysis, coalescing, allocation, and spilling into a single register allocator pass. The register allocator pass is then responsible for controlling its own sub-passes (not just the order of passes, but also termination conditions). Similarly, branch folding and if-conversion should be lumped together into a cfg optimization pass. Devang, hint hint. :-) Evan On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Hey all, > > is there a simple way to alternate between different register > allocators at run time? I would like to decide dynamically...

...no non-standard things at all? So we'd get pubnames and pubtypes and aranges but no Apple attributes or accelerator tables and not the GNU TLS opcode. Is that a useful mode to have?) Re where to put the guidelines: ought to be committed to the repo somewhere, although whether it's as a lump of text in a docs webpage or a lump of commentary in some source file is not clear; opinions welcome.) In the source, probably - somewhere near the enum or major entry point to querying it. By the definitions of the predicate functions, WFM. We might want to talk a bit more about when to err on...

Hi and thanks in advance, I am fairly new with R so I hope this problem isn't too amateur. I have a vector of count data which correspond to vectors of date (%m/%d/%Y) and time of day (%H:%M:%S). I am trying to compute various statistics (e.g. daily max) by lumping the data together by day. I have been able to utilize tapply() and group the counts together, but with the method I use I end up losing the corresponding time of day information. This is what I have done so far data=*vector of integers *hours= *"character" vector of times %H:%M:S%...

...;name") for the frontal (view=="f") and profile (view=="p") views of each face (each face has an identifier "num"). I'd like to find the correlation as well. For each subject, since there are 100 faces, there will be 100 points on the scatterplot. I would just lump all the subjects' data together for the plot and correlation I think (unless somebody tells me I should do each subject separately). I'm stumped on how to do this. Thanks very much for any help! Bill

Hey all, is there a simple way to alternate between different register allocators at run time? I would like to decide dynamically which register allocator to use. The decision is based on information that is produced by a pass that executes before register allocation takes place. Is it possible to modify RegisterRegAlloc::Registry to take into consideration this information? Is there

...; > Actually, yes it was. Proper netiquette when submitting to a technical list is to have a single topic per message. This makes it easy to track issues individually, without the messiness that occurs from bundling several issues together in a single missive. One large email with a big lump of diffs is much less clear, and takes substantially more effort to parse: Are the patches independent? Which fix corresponds to which problem? Being new to this group, I am simply acting as my experience dictates and discussing these issues in the way I feel is best. If my infamiliarity wi...

...quot;?? Can we at least pretend to be a community of professionals?) > >> I understand that it is suggested that I should give all unauthorized devices >> network access (so that they can PXE boot or whatever), which is what I >> don?t want to do. > > It is illogical to lump all network access together into a single category. That depends on your point of view. When you have access to a network, you have better chances of being able to do something you?re not supposed to than you have when you don?t have any access at all. That doesn?t say anything about how it is l...

everyone-- I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type handle from a type, rather than vice versa as its name would imply. Should I send a patch to change the name of the function to reflect its type better, or should I just lump it? — j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> http://jhw.vox.com/

...) & 1; } > > Shouldn't that be MMO->isVolatile()? It's not a bug; the code could be written either way. There's actually an assert in MemSDNode's constructor which checks that they're the same. I believe the code is structured this way because it makes it easy to lump the volatile flag in with other data which is significant for CSE purposes, but it's not critical that it work that way. Dan

...I, and many other reasonable people, consider the phrase: "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software." ... to be talking about *copies of the software*. A binary is not a copy of the software, it is a lump of bits derived from it. I am not a lawyer, and do not offer this as legal advise. However, lawyers that I respect agree with this interpretation. You can choose to interpret it however you would like. -Chris

In the implementation of the AliasSetTracker, I see LoadInst, StoreInst, and VAArgInst are treated specially. Why aren't AtomicCmpXchgInst and AtomicRMWInst treated with similar care? Lumping together with other unknown instructions seems unnecessarily expensive in compile time. Preston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120119/6e50526f/attachment.html>