search for: lukewarm

Hi How do I concatenate two lists element-by-element? Example: list.1 <- list(temperature=c("hot","cold") , size=c("big","medium")) list.2 <- list(temperature=c("lukewarm") , size=c("massive","tiny")) list.wanted <- list(temperature=c("hot","cold","lukewarm") , size=c("big","medium","massive","tiny")) (the lists are dimnames() of an array)...

Hi I''d like to tag and release 0.0.38 in the next week or so. I know we still have a nasty GC bug on windows, but I''m thinking we could just tell people to use GC.disable for the time being if that avoids the problem. After all, it''s not meant for production use yet. This would make other recent bugfixes and enhancements available. Plus having a binary build out

...have no idea how/where to check it). I don't think I can find much more precise cause within reasonable time, ICE doesn't reproduce in simple cases and I'm not committed enough to do a lengthy binary search of the combination of factors that causes this particular ICE when I only have a lukewarm hope MS would ever give this bug a look. Either way, I thought I'd try to push this through. It's not high-value enough to try harder, but it'd be great if someone could help me submit it - it's a really simple couple of patches that make LLVM/clang compile on MSVC10 without furthe...

...have no idea how/where to check it). I don't think I can find much more precise cause within reasonable time, ICE doesn't reproduce in simple cases and I'm not committed enough to do a lengthy binary search of the combination of factors that causes this particular ICE when I only have a lukewarm hope MS would ever give this bug a look. Either way, I thought I'd try to push this through. It's not high-value enough to try harder, but it'd be great if someone could help me submit it - it's a really simple couple of patches that make LLVM/clang compile on MSVC10 without furthe...

I'm very lukewarm on this one. Why is this a plugin-level feature? For other protocol things we have used command line options (eg. -o / -n and the various TLS options). Also I understand that this found a bug in qemu-nbd which is great, but why else would it ever be needed? Maybe we can control this with some ki...

Hi Can anyone provide me with a Manchester (0161) UK DID number, preferably IAX2 but SIP is ok too, that I can use for my incoming calls? Call volume will be low. The critical thing is that DTMF must be correctly passed 100% of the time, unlike Sipgate, my current (free) provider, whose DTMF detection/passing is not at all reliable, making it useless for a virtual receptionist scenario. I

...f CC integrators and resellers about the AgentCallbackLogin() deprecation issue, and I'd dare say nobody is enthusiastic about it. With all its problems, AgentCallBackLogin is the workhorse of most of today's Asterisk CCs, and my impression is that the proposed solution meets a very lukewarm reception at the moment. Just my euro 0.02 l. On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:26:51 +0100, Douglas Garstang <dgarstang@oneeighty.com> wrote: >> > The other thing is, that "show agents" >> > doesn't show me which agents are logged in and if I use "show que...

When we added support for .extents, we had nbdkit unconditionally support structured replies if the client requests them, and the plugin's .can_extents has no impact on what the server advertises. However, while the plugin API doesn't care whether the client requested SR, there is still a case to be made for allowing a filter to prevent SR, at least for testing purposese (such as

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Sergiy Migdalskiy <migdalskiy at hotmail.com> wrote: > In order to get llvm to compile on Windows with MSVC 10, I have to disable > inline on utostr to avoid internal compiler failure, and disable _xgetbv > call in OsSupportsAVX because it's only defined in MSVC 2012 compiler. The > first patch (noinline) is known for many months now. I'm

In order to get llvm to compile on Windows with MSVC 10, I have to disable inline on utostr to avoid internal compiler failure, and disable _xgetbv call in OsSupportsAVX because it's only defined in MSVC 2012 compiler. The first patch (noinline) is known for many months now. I'm a casual llvm user, and don't know the proper channels to go through to submit a patch. Could someone tell

...IP>: icmp: echo request No responses come back though. Any suggestions? [1] http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html -- David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/ Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi Robin, responses inline. -Graham > On 11 Jun 2018, at 16:47, Robin Kruppe <robin.kruppe at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Graham, > Hi David, > > glad to hear other people are thinking about RVV codegen! > > On 7 June 2018 at 18:10, Graham Hunter <Graham.Hunter at arm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 6 Jun 2018, at 17:36, David A.

To give a little update here: - I've been further investigating and found an issue [1] with the Cargo build tool that most Rust projects use. This issue prevents all projects using Cargo from properly using PGO because it causes symbol names to be different between the generate and the use phase. With this issue fixed the number of "No profile data available for function" warnings