search for: lsd

....factor(Nitrogen),data=Rotationdata_R) Ahmed Attia, Ph.D. Agronomist & Soil Scientist On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > >> On Dec 25, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Ahmed Attia <ahmedatia80 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> LSD.test > > ?LSD.test > No documentation for ?LSD.test? in specified packages and libraries: > you could try ???LSD.test? > > -- > David Winsemius > Alameda, CA, USA > > 'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.' -Gehm's Corollar...

Hi there, I am trying to run LSD.test(model) I used the following commands: attach(model) m1<- glm(ttl.m ~ site+year, family=quasipoisson, data= model) df<-df.residual(m1) MSerror<-deviance(m1)/df The following command did not work: comparison<- LSD.test (ttl.m, site+year, df, MSerror, alpha = 0.05, group=FALSE) I...

LSD-test produces error for this code; code <- as.factor(Rotationdata_R$`Rot/code`) #factor in the main Nitrogen <- as.factor(Rotationdata_R$Nitrogen) #factor in the sub Rep <- as.factor(Rotationdata_R$REP) #blocks Year <- as.factor(Rotationdata_R$YEAR) #years model <- aov(Rotationda...

...s aov or lm and my model class is aovlist. > tried tidy from broom library but did not work. To make it class aov, > I had to remove the error term; > > model <- aov(Rotationdata_R$`GY(Mg/ha)`~Rep+code*as.factor(Nitrogen),data=Rotationdata_R) You seemed to have missed my point that LSD.test is not in the packages loaded by default. > Ahmed Attia, Ph.D. > Agronomist & Soil Scientist > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> On Dec 25, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Ahmed...

...osname="$sysver.5.7" ;; SunOS.5.8) osname="$sysver.5.8" ;; SunOS.5.9) osname="$sysver.5.9" ;; *) printf "%s" 'Wrong system level encountered...' exit 86 esac osname=SunOS.5.8 PATH=/usr/lsd/$osname/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin PATH=/usr/lsd/SunOS.5.8/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin export PATH + export PATH which gcc + which gcc /usr/local/bin/gcc gcc --version + gcc --version 3.0.2 which as + which as /usr/lsd/SunOS.5.8/bin/as as --version + as --version GNU assembler 2.11.2...

> On Dec 25, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Ahmed Attia <ahmedatia80 at gmail.com> wrote: > > LSD.test ?LSD.test No documentation for ?LSD.test? in specified packages and libraries: you could try ???LSD.test? -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA 'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.' -Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

Dear anyone who knows more about R than me (so everyone). I have been bashing my head on the keyboard all day trying to do something with my table. I have some data, like so: yyyy-mm Rainfall(mm) 1 1977-02 17.4 2 1977-03 34.0 3 1977-04 26.2 4 1977-05 42.6 5 1977-06 58.6 6 1977-07 23.2 7 1977-08 26.8 8 1977-09 48.4 9

Hi, I have a matrix of results of multiple 2x2 chi^2 tests, non- significant tests are marked as TRUE. Is there a function for grouping those variables in a similar way LSD.test from agricolae library does? I reviewed LSD.test's source but it's not helpful for me. This is my matrix: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] 1 TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE 2 FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 3 TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE 4...

I updated to CentOS 4.5 yesterday and now I am finding the snmpd daemon is logging reams and reams of these messages: May 20 10:40:03 mx01 snmpd[2572]: Connection from - 127.0.0.1 May 20 10:40:03 mx01 snmpd[2572]: transport socket = 12 Is there a way to turn off this useless logging? I am getting these every 5 minutes (every time MRTG updates my MailScanner statistics). So far what I tried

Hi, I'm designing a experiment in order to compare the growing of several clones of a tree specie. It will be a complete randomized block design. How can I decide what model of mean comparision to choose? LSD, HSD,TukeyHSD, Duncan,...? Thanks in advance

If i insert \u2264 inside the text, like this lsd_label <- "LSD (P \u2264 0.05) = " the result is "LSD (P = 0.05) = " instead "LSD (P ? 0.05) = " how can i solve this problem? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/less-than-or-equal-to-glyph-tp3073557p3073557.html Sent from t...

...(1),5), rep(as.character(2),5), rep(as.character(3),5), rep(as.character(4),5), rep(as.character(5),5), rep(as.character(6),5) ) crd2=data.frame(x,y2) model1=aov(x~y2,data=crd2) TukeyHSD(model1) ============================= I can do the HSD like that, Q1-but how do I do the Fisher's LSD? Q2-and how can I do that table in the attachement (page 8/9)? ( i dont know how to describe that thing, orginally produced in SAS) Q3-in the tukey output, can i ask to to show whether it's significant or not by indicating ***? (attachment page 6) Thanks! casperyc SAS output http://n4.nabb...

Please help. I really like R and I have been looking at how to do LSD multiple comparison test with data that has more than one factor. So far, I am unsuccessful. Please help! Me

Hi there, Is there a function that can do a Fisher's LSD multiple comparisons in a two-way ANOVA? I hope to get a result similar with TukeyHSD(). Especially, I hope to know the significance of comparisons between the interactions of two factors. In the following example: x <- c(76, 84, 78, 80, 82, 70, 62, 72, 71, 69, 72, 74, 66, 74, 68, 66, 69,...

.... Please see the discussion of this example in R-help: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-January/123451.html ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:42:35 +0100 (CET) >From: "Jorge Lampurlanes Castel" <jlampur at eagrof.UdL.es> >Subject: Re: [R] LSD multiple comparison test >To: "Richard M. Heiberger" <rmh at temple.edu> > >Thank you very much for your useful advice. >I do not found LSD but I am using Tukey test instead. > >In the model: > > lm.1 <- lm(variable ~ BLOC + TIL * YEAR , data=selvanera)...

...pply the output of flac's analyse > function (option -a on the command line) to give us some more > information on what the resulting file looks like? Certainly -- I've uploaded the analysis files for both the -6 and -7 encodes, in case you wanted to compare: http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/6.ana http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/7.ana The encode seems to proceed normally until 59% of the way through the file, but then it takes a couple of minutes to proceed through to 61% of the way through -- it's during this period that the file inflates up to 9GB in size. The last 39% o...

...r y sus interacciones y finalmente hacer un comparación de medias del efecto fijo y del efecto Localidad. NO ser si es posible hacer tal cosa con los efectos aleatorios. He probado de todos, con lme y lmer pero no he podido introducir las interacciones deseada ni al final he podido hacer un LSD o SNK. Como puedo implementarlo en R (teniendo en cuenta los efectos e interacciones anteriores (A,L,G)) y al final hacer una comparación de medias del Genotipo (G) (LSD o SNK)? Muchas gracias Atentamente Marçal Plans -- UPC-ESAB. Campus del Baix Llobregat . Edifici D4. C. Esteve Terradas...

Hi all. I'm working on an assignment for a psychology class and I am not sure how to adjust the y-axis so it displays the range: 0, 5, 10, 15 The code below is almost ideal: lsd = c(3, 5, 13) mar = c(1, 2, 3) g_range <- range(0, lsd, mar) plot(lsd, type="o", col="blue", ylim=g_range, axes=FALSE, ann=FALSE) axis(1, at=1:3, lab=c("Low","Med","High")) axis(2, las=1, at=5*0:max(mar)) box() lines(mar, type="o", pch=...

I have no problem setting up my mixed model, or performing anova or lsmeans on my model?s outputs. However, performing lsd mean separation is giving me fits. So I do not have a problem when using two-way anova model. When using the code: fit.yield.add <- lm(data = ryzup, Yield ~ Rep + Nitrogen + Treatment) LSD.test(fit.yield.add, trt = "Nitrogen", alpha = 0.1, console = TRUE) It works beautifully....

On 16/07/13 8:10 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Leigh Dyer wrote: > >> Certainly -- I've uploaded the analysis files for both the -6 and -7 >> encodes, in case you wanted to compare: >> >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/6.ana >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/7.ana >> >> The encode seems to proceed normally until 59% of the way through the >> file, but then it takes a couple of minutes to proceed through to 61% of >> the way through -- it's during this period that the file i...