Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1392 matches for "lsb".
Did you mean:
lib
2009 Dec 10
2
Is lsb 3.2+ detrimental to CentOS 5.4?
I found out today that Google Chrome is now available for Linux.
However, and this is a big but:
$ sudo rpm -ivh google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm
Password:
warning: google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA
signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991
error: Failed dependencies:
lsb >= 3.2 is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.x86_64
xdg-utils is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.x86_64
$ yum list | grep -i lsb
redhat-lsb.i386 3.1-12.3.EL.el5.centos installed
redhat-lsb.x86_64 3.1-12.3.E...
2014 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2014:1270 CentOS 7 redhat-lsb FASTTRACK BugFix Update
...nd Bugfix Advisory 2014:1270
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1270.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
6637f912283e727dbb61803200b26ad1974e4ed1c254d8cb315d79be3cb052f6 redhat-lsb-4.1-27.el7.i686.rpm
9bc116342408406c1b18cd90ce849db7d0afd21439edfad43e8c473674e754a4 redhat-lsb-4.1-27.el7.x86_64.rpm
a411a23f54fc9fb13d1de9b7d988ce5955a9158bf83f624d88ba05a96c70578a redhat-lsb-core-4.1-27.el7.i686.rpm
23d6961448f2caec14444aedecd238a5df1b80890d32c2e6dd1920d48fd89109 redhat-lsb-c...
2012 Jun 11
2
Update issue - tar package problem?
...olving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
<snip>
--> Running transaction check
---> Package unixODBC-libs.i386 0:2.2.11-10.el5 set to be updated
---> Package unixODBC-libs.x86_64 0:2.2.11-10.el5 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: /bin/tar for package: redhat-lsb
--> Processing Dependency: /bin/tar for package: redhat-lsb
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
redhat-lsb-4.0-2.1.4.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: /bin/tar is needed by package
redhat-lsb-4.0-2.1.4.el5.x86_64 (installed)
redhat-lsb-4.0-2.1.4.el5...
2007 Apr 12
1
upgrade to .22.3 and got errors on packages (debian sarge)
I just upgraded to .22.3 from .22.1 and now i got several error
messages. I havent found why i got them. Nothing has changed but still
there is error and i cannot correct them:
err: Package[lsb-release](provider=aptitude): Could not find latest version
i run debug:
debug: package provider aptitude: Executing ''/usr/bin/dpkg-query -W
--showformat ${Status} ${Package} ${Version}\n lsb-release''
debug: package provider aptitude: Executing ''/usr/bin/apt-cache polic...
2008 Jun 13
3
is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Hi all,
Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified?
I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also
LSB certified?
In case you need to know, I am compiling a list of LSB certified Linux
just for comparison as to who would want to be LSB certified. Just to
see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified....
2013 Mar 09
0
CEBA-2013:0448 CentOS 6 redhat-lsb Update
...and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0448
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0448.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
240d5f608ee00f4d0e66c400dfc28e9ae53369d34d1dff53b3f252e06f053960 redhat-lsb-4.0-7.el6.centos.i686.rpm
55ad2578b03009690a8c4fb2d9f8feb0e2a809cdc0cc85d007fc5a6561d99f87 redhat-lsb-compat-4.0-7.el6.centos.i686.rpm
c8a54450a1716a676b06db0a734c53c7057925359cb4e4bc36fa66f32cff5a0f redhat-lsb-core-4.0-7.el6.centos.i686.rpm
419425dc160df8960ca14931e18eba9039e376e3dca291d51436a7e...
2007 Jun 16
7
facter lsb* on Fedora
I just realized that if you don''t have redhat-lsb on your (Fedora 7)
box, all those lsb* facts don''t show up. Should I make redhat-lsb a
requirement for the facter rpm to guard against that ?
David
2009 Mar 31
6
RELENG_7 ata panic on atacontrol attach
Hi there colleagues,
atapci3: <nVidia nForce MCP55 SATA300 controller> port
0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f mem
0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0
atacontrol detach ata7
- insert ATA disk (ad14)
atacontrol attach ata7
pinics with Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
#1 0xc0533227
2013 Apr 25
7
Cents OS from Bash Shell
I want to know the right command to type from a bash shell so that i can
1) Check the version of my cent os
2) Check all the open ports (tcp and udp) on my machine
3) Open a specific port say port 3306 so that a telnet request from a
remote machiene can be accepted
4) Disable the effect of 3 above in case I want to
Thanks in anticiaption of your kind responses to the questions
2012 Dec 19
2
yum install make does not work
...ersion
Package pam-1.1.1-10.el6_2.1.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Package nss-3.13.5-1.el6_3.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Package db4-4.7.25-17.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package redhat-lsb.x86_64 0:4.0-3.el6.centos will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: redhat-lsb-printing for package:
redhat-lsb-4.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: redhat-lsb-graphics for package:
redhat-lsb-4.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: perl-Test-Simple for packag...
2008 Nov 09
1
Failed rpmbuild-ing samba-3.0.32.tar.gz
...2 . I downloaded the source
form samba.org and trying to create rpm package from one. I created
~/.rpmmacros file
%_tmppath /home/fcmario/tmp
%_topdir /home/fcmario/src/rpm
%prefix /usr/local
and ran
% rpmbuild -ta ~/src/rpm/SOURCES/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz
I got error messages that it cannot cd to lsb-samba-2.2.1.tar.gz. I go to
~/src/rpm/SPECS and edited lsb-samba.spec to become
Summary: SAMBA
Name: samba # the old phrase was lsb-samba
Version: 3.0.32 # the old phrase was 2.2.1
Release: 0
# More lines here
%build
export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib/lsb...
2013 Nov 28
2
LSB Certification
Hey All,
Could someone provide a URL to a page that states what LSB level
RHEL/CentOS 6.4 is certified to.
I'm looking to download a driver:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Epson/Epson-WorkForce_1100
They offer a driver for LSB 3.1 or LSB 3.2. I'm hoping that one of
those applies to CentOS 6.4.
--
_
?v?
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registe...
2014 Oct 10
1
redhat-lsb
I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even
redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent
reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version.
Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory does pick up the name, it
doesn't include Centos (pre-7.x) in the 'all Linux' grouping...
2010 Mar 14
2
dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.1+2.2.1 failed to compile
...Leaving directory `/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.1+2.2.1/tools'
make -C tools config
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.1+2.2.1/tools'
install -D dahdi.init /etc/init.d/dahdi
/sbin/chkconfig --add dahdi
insserv: warning: script 'S20theserver' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (0 6) of script `umountfs'
overwrites defaults (empty).
insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (0 6) of script `umountroot'
overwrites defaults (empty).
insserv: warning: script 'dbus' missing LSB tags and overrid...
2005 Jun 02
2
Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5
...many things off of SunOS 4.1 (retroactively Solaris 1)
and Solaris 2, and Solaris uses 2-3.
[ Remember, Solaris was the original GNU platform. ]
So in that regard, Debian is actually like Solaris in its use of 2-3,
instead of Fedora-based 3-5.
Secondly, you are referring to Linux Standards Base (LSB).
Specifically, Section 8.5 in the General Section of the latest revision:
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic.html#RUNLEVELS
And even this latest version states:
"However, it is not required that LSB-compliant run-time environments
use these run...
2012 May 18
2
Facter 1.6.9 complains about "No LSB modules are available."
Hi,
it seems that Facter 1.6.9 complains that "No LSB modules are
available." on every run. This is on Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04, probably
others as well. This message (on stderr) usually comes from calling
"lsb_release -v" when no additional LSB modules are installed. Facter
apparently calls "lsb_release -v -s" in facter/lsbrele...
2008 Jan 22
2
Can I remove X11 while keeping LSB compatibility?
Hi all,
I have a Cent OS 5 box with a fairly full install which I'm trying to
strip down. Since this machine will be running headless I would like
to remove all of the X11 stuff which is installed on it. However, it
seems that the "redhat-lsb" package, which I would like to keep, is
dependent on X11
- redhat-lsb depends on /usr/bin/lpr
- /usr/bin/lpr is provided by cups
- cups depends on paps
- paps depends on pango
- pango depends on libX11
Is it possible to safely break this dependancy chain so that I keep
redhat-lsb while...
2009 Feb 23
3
Require package not working as expected
I have the following as part of a module:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Ensure "lsb-release" installed
package {"lsb-release":
ensure => installed,
}
# Use our sources.list
file { "/etc/apt/sources.list":
owner => root,
group => root,
mode => 644,
content => template("tclb...
2005 Jan 12
3
Regarding postfix dep for redhat-lsb
when i checked the SPEC file for redhat-lsb i did a search
for postfix and it didnt find anything...how can there be
a postfix dep if its not mentioned in the SPEC file for redhat-lsb?
2008 Feb 10
3
Problem with PAE-less processor in xen 3.1.0
...ssor. So I build and install PAE-disabled kernel (for
dom0), but I can''t find the way to turn off PAE i XEN micro-kernel. Is
there any manner to change XEN micro-kernel in 3.1.0 version to be
PAE-disabled ?
I get folowing messages, when booting xen kernel:
(XEN) Xen kernel: 32-bit, PAE, lsb, paddr 0x100000 -> 0x664000
(XEN) Dom0 kernel: 32-bit, lsb
(XEN) Mismatch between Xen and DOM0 kernel
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) Could not set up DOM0 guest OS
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN)
(XEN) Reboot in five second...