search for: lsans

Hi all, TL;DR 1) We should change the way we parse common runtime flags in sanitizers. 2) We should make ASan aware of the tools it can be combined with (LSan and UBSan). 3) We may have to restrict the tools UBSan can be combined with (currently to ASan) (see [1]) Currently we have two kinds of sanitizer runtime flags: tool-specific flags and "common flags", defined in sanitizer_common

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Hope you're assuming there's always a single copy of common_flags in > the process. > This isn't the case for e.g. ASan+UBSan on Mac, but that's a broken setup. > > What if we let the tools protect specific flags (by adding a bool to > each flag) once they set their values

How about tweaking the compiler-rt cmakefiles so that if lsan is not supported, the target check-lsan still exists but does nothing? I've attached a patch that does this. (I don't know much about cmake so there might be a better way of doing it.) Alternatively, can I change the zorg build script so that "run sanitizer tests in gcc build" doesn't try to run check-lsan etc

Hi, We are trying to enable LeakSanitizer on our asan/msan llvm bootstrap bot (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/). In clang itself there are two leaks (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18318, http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2472) and one lsan-hostile feature (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18320), all of which are easy to fix. And there are also

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:38 PM, dblaikie at gmail.com <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Its generally been by design that tblgen leaks. Might be nice to fix one day > but it's been that way for a while now so don't expect it to be fixed soon. > > If thats the suppression mechanism of choice (I would've expected a build > flag option) for lsan, I'd say go for

On Dec 25, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Like this? > > +extern "C" { > +// Disable LeakSanitizer, see

LGTM. I think it is totally reasonable to just disable LSan directly in tablegen at least for now. I would leave some comments on the disabling to clarify: 1) What it does, the reader may not have heard about LSan. 2) Some of the high-level information from this thread as pointers for anyone who wants to go and fix this some day. -Chandler On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kostya Serebryany

Hi, Currently the first stage ("run sanitizer tests in gcc build") of the sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 buildbot is only failing because of: + cd clang_build + make -j16 check-lsan make: *** No rule to make target `check-lsan'. Stop. + echo @@@STEP_FAILURE@@@ @@@STEP_FAILURE@@@ + cd clang_build + make -j16 check-msan make: *** No rule to make target `check-msan'. Stop. + echo

When I build compiler-rt with clang 3.2, all lsan tests pass. The only failing tests I see are in ubsan: Failing Tests (6): UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Float/cast-overflow.cpp UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/add-overflow.cpp UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/div-zero.cpp UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/sub-overflow.cpp UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer ::

I blame this line in lsan/lit_tests/lit.cfg: # Setup attributes common for all compiler-rt projects. compiler_rt_lit_cfg = os.path.join(llvm_src_root, "projects", "compiler-rt", "lib", "lit.common.cfg") On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > > On Fri, May 24,

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > When I build compiler-rt with clang 3.2, all lsan tests pass. The only > failing tests I see are in ubsan: > > Failing Tests (6): > UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Float/cast-overflow.cpp > UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/add-overflow.cpp > UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer ::

Okay, dropping gcc 4.4.3 makes sense. How do you feel about using clang 3.2 (and the upcoming 3.3) instead of tip-of-the-trunk clang? It looks like everything works great, but that you just need to make those UB tests 'unsupported' since they fail with "libclang_rt.ubsan was built without __int128 support". Thanks, Greg On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Alexey Samsonov

Hi, I'm seeming new regressions form 4.0.0 for mips big endian: DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: custom.cc DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: propagate.c SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard-dso.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips64-Linux :: Linux/getpwnam_r_invalid_user.cc

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> > wrote: > > When I build compiler-rt with clang 3.2, all lsan tests pass. The only > > failing tests I see are in ubsan: > > > > Failing Tests (6): > > UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer ::

UBsan tests work for me when I run "check-ubsan" in both build trees (the one with gcc 4.6.3 as a host compiler, and the one with fresh Clang). It's pretty convenient for us to use fresh Clang to configure LLVM and compiler-rt. One major reason is that autoconf/make build system always builds compiler-rt with just-built Clang. There are other benefits, like keeping sanitizers code

X32 support patch for compiler-rt. Applies against current trunk. --- projects/compiler-rt/make/platform/clang_linux.mk~ 2013-08-21 06:27:38.000000000 +0000 +++ projects/compiler-rt/make/platform/clang_linux.mk 2013-08-21 11:16:55.891621025 +0000 @@ -41,7 +41,18 @@ SupportedArches += x86_64 endif else - SupportedArches := x86_64 + # x86-64 arch has two ABIs 64 bit x86-64 and 32 bit

...N32_LoadLibraryExA loaded .so but dll sound.dll still not found err:win32:ELF_FindExportedFunction Can't import from UNIX dynamic libs by ordinal, sorry. err:win32:ELF_FindExportedFunction Can't import from UNIX dynamic libs by ordinal, sorry. fixme:font:CreateScalableFontResourceA (0,"LSANS.fot","LSANS.TTF","D:\\Program Files\\Civilization III"): stub fixme:font:CreateScalableFontResourceA (0,"LSANS.fot","LSANS.TTF","D:\\Program Files\\Civilization III"): stub err:opengl:X11DRV_ChoosePixelFormat Flag not supported ! fixme:system:C...

> Android runtime is special, we build it in a separate build tree configured with > -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=$LLVM_CHECKOUT/cmake/platforms/Android.cmake This worked great, thanks! Would you mind tweaking Android.cmake so that I can override the location of the C compiler? The current version forces me to use the just-built-clang and that the new build directory be in a sibling directory.

For me, UBsan fails with clang 3.2 and passes with clang 3.3. Using a fixed version allows you to build all clang/llvm/compiler-rt with one compiler. It simplifies the build process quite a bit. Also better for isolating regressions in compiler-rt, especially if you use git-bisect. Greg On May 29, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > UBsan tests work

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Most likely, you need > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizer Thanks! > I don't think lsan supports this mode directly, > but why do you think that the init-time allocations are going to be > "leaked"? > If there is some object still pointing to