search for: lp_ignore_error

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lp_ignore_error".

Did you mean: lp_ignore_errors
2007 Oct 10
0
patch for rsync: provides "nice = N" option
...chroot", P_BOOL, P_LOCAL, &sDefault.use_chroot, NULL,0}, @@ -411,6 +414,7 @@ FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_max_connections, max_connections) FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_max_verbosity, max_verbosity) FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_timeout, timeout) +FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_nice, niceval) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_ignore_errors, ignore_errors) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_ignore_nonreadable, ignore_nonreadable) --- proto.h.orig 2007-08-19 07:41:19.000000000 +0000 +++ proto.h 2007-08-19 07:42:12.000000000 +0000 @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ int lp_max_connections(int ); int lp_max_verbosity(int ); int lp_timeout(int ); +int lp_nice(int );...
2007 Feb 15
2
Client can trick daemon into running server code with am_server == 0
Dear rsync people (particularly Wayne), I noticed that an rsync daemon counts on the client sending a --server option so that am_server gets set to 1. If the client doesn't supply this option, am_server remains 0 but the daemon runs start_server anyway. This is potentially dangerous and might lead to a security hole, although I haven't found one yet. I suggest that the daemon either
2003 Jul 24
0
(no subject)
..._file_entry(flist->files[n], f, 0); + } + send_file_entry(NULL, f, 0); + if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 15) { + send_uid_list(f); + } + if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 17 && !read_batch) { /* dw-added readbatch */ + extern int module_id; + write_int(f, lp_ignore_errors(module_id) ? 0 : io_error); + } + } struct file_list *recv_file_list(int f) { diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/main.c rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c *** rsync-2.5.6/main.c Tue Jan 28 05:05:53 2003 --- rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c Wed Jul 23 15:55:18 2003 *************** *** 263,270 **** }...
2004 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite
...if (file->basename[0]) { flist->files[flist->count++] = file; send_file_entry(file, f, base_flags); --- 950,955 ---- *************** *** 1301,1313 **** * protocol version 15 */ recv_uid_list(f, flist); - if (!read_batch) { /* Recv the io_error flag */ if (lp_ignore_errors(module_id) || ignore_errors) read_int(f); else io_error |= read_int(f); ! } } if (verbose > 3) --- 1298,1309 ---- * protocol version 15 */ recv_uid_list(f, flist); /* Recv the io_error flag */ if (lp_ignore_errors(module_id) || ignore_errors)...
2001 Aug 06
1
merge rsync+ into rsync (was Re: rsync-2.4.7 NEWS file)
> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.