Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lp_ignore_errors".
Did you mean:
map_ignore_errors
2007 Oct 10
0
patch for rsync: provides "nice = N" option
...chroot", P_BOOL, P_LOCAL, &sDefault.use_chroot, NULL,0},
@@ -411,6 +414,7 @@
FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_max_connections, max_connections)
FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_max_verbosity, max_verbosity)
FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_timeout, timeout)
+FN_LOCAL_INTEGER(lp_nice, niceval)
FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_ignore_errors, ignore_errors)
FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_ignore_nonreadable, ignore_nonreadable)
--- proto.h.orig 2007-08-19 07:41:19.000000000 +0000
+++ proto.h 2007-08-19 07:42:12.000000000 +0000
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
int lp_max_connections(int );
int lp_max_verbosity(int );
int lp_timeout(int );
+int lp_nice(int );...
2007 Feb 15
2
Client can trick daemon into running server code with am_server == 0
Dear rsync people (particularly Wayne),
I noticed that an rsync daemon counts on the client sending a --server
option so that am_server gets set to 1. If the client doesn't supply
this option, am_server remains 0 but the daemon runs start_server
anyway. This is potentially dangerous and might lead to a security
hole, although I haven't found one yet. I suggest that the daemon
either
2003 Jul 24
0
(no subject)
..._file_entry(flist->files[n], f, 0);
+ }
+ send_file_entry(NULL, f, 0);
+ if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 15) {
+ send_uid_list(f);
+ }
+ if (f != -1 && remote_version >= 17 && !read_batch) { /* dw-added
readbatch */
+ extern int module_id;
+ write_int(f, lp_ignore_errors(module_id) ? 0 : io_error);
+ }
+ }
struct file_list *recv_file_list(int f)
{
diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/main.c rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c
*** rsync-2.5.6/main.c Tue Jan 28 05:05:53 2003
--- rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/main.c Wed Jul 23 15:55:18 2003
***************
*** 263,270 ****
}...
2004 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite
...if (file->basename[0]) {
flist->files[flist->count++] = file;
send_file_entry(file, f, base_flags);
--- 950,955 ----
***************
*** 1301,1313 ****
* protocol version 15 */
recv_uid_list(f, flist);
- if (!read_batch) {
/* Recv the io_error flag */
if (lp_ignore_errors(module_id) || ignore_errors)
read_int(f);
else
io_error |= read_int(f);
! }
}
if (verbose > 3)
--- 1298,1309 ----
* protocol version 15 */
recv_uid_list(f, flist);
/* Recv the io_error flag */
if (lp_ignore_errors(module_id) || ignore_errors)...
2001 Aug 06
1
merge rsync+ into rsync (was Re: rsync-2.4.7 NEWS file)
> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch?
Thanks for the reminder.
I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the
"branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody
screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or
Wednesday.
I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the
man page, so we should fix that in the future.