search for: lovehearts

On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. > > Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an > English company. its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be i...

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:53 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Thanks a lot! The most difficult part of this I noticed is to make sure > they responded with report of what discovered and which actions were > taken, and if this didn't happen to have the whole block of IPs registered > to them blocked off (at least this is what I am doing where I can). (1) Not all complaints about

On Wed, August 26, 2015 7:40 pm, zep wrote: > > > On 08/26/2015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. >>> >>> Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an >>> English company. >> >> its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web >> links. the first...

...aaaaaa at bbbbbb.cccccc Message-ID : (not yet downloaded) Subject : (not yet downloaded) Location : Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Firewall ban : Yes E2# : 888 Report : [8C93] IP blocked for abuse. > We received a junk email once every 6 to 12 weeks. Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an English company. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

On 08/26/2015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. >> >> Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an >> English company. > > its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web > links. the first domain is registered to...

...ource to do anything. > > validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was > poorly written. > > so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. > > so, to all of you, i pass along a much more loving 'love' link; > > http://lovehearts.com > > enjoy. > > If you look at the SPF record for loverhearts.com (where they are coming from for me) there are a whole slew of servers permitted to send on their behalf. So I took all those IP addresses specified and added them to my blacklist, it appears spammers are learning...

...to do anything. >>> validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was > poorly written. >>> so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. so, > to all of you, i pass along a much more loving 'love' link; >>> http://lovehearts.com >>> enjoy. >> >> If you look at the SPF record for loverhearts.com (where they are coming > from for me) there are a whole slew of servers permitted to send on > their behalf. > > This way you may block good people. SPF records you used are owned by bad > guy...

On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > | Hash: SHA1 > | > | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: > | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > | > > | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with

...do nothing. and there is nothing in page source to do anything. validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was poorly written. so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. so, to all of you, i pass along a much more loving 'love' link; http://lovehearts.com enjoy. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .

...nothing in page source to do anything. >> validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was poorly written. >> so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. so, to all of you, i pass along a much more loving 'love' link; >> http://lovehearts.com >> enjoy. > > If you look at the SPF record for loverhearts.com (where they are coming from for me) there are a whole slew of servers permitted to send on their behalf. This way you may block good people. SPF records you used are owned by bad guys: loverhearts.com allows others res...

...over.com for web > links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in > Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in > Bangladesh. yeah, right. Both domains were initially registered about > a month ago. You are correct. Now to apologise to lovehearts.com Easier just to block Digital Ocean for port 25 - as I have previously done for all port 80 traffic. Thanks. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.