search for: loverhearts

On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote: > > > On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: > <<>> > > something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will.. > >>> | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com > > loverhearts.com is a single page that seems to do nothing. and there is > nothing in page source to do anything. > > validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was > poorly written. > > so the only harm is spam, which i now ha...

julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content that is not suitable for minors. It is possible subscribed under different address. IP of offending spam : Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com [45.55.128.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-...

...015 12:11 PM, g wrote: >>> On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: >>> <<>> >>> something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will.. >>>>> | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com >>> loverhearts.com is a single page that seems to do nothing. and there is > nothing in page source to do anything. >>> validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was > poorly written. >>> so the only harm is spam, which...

On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > | Hash: SHA1 > | > | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: > | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > | > > | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content > | >> that is not suitable for minors. > | > > | >> It is possible subscribed under different address. > | > > | >> IP of offending spam : > | > > | >>...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content >> that is not suitable for minors. > >> It is possible subscribed under different address. > >> IP of offending spam : > >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com &...

...> > On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote: >> On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: >> <<>> >> something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will.. >>>> | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com >> loverhearts.com is a single page that seems to do nothing. and there is nothing in page source to do anything. >> validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was poorly written. >> so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to m...

...wrote: >> On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. >>> >>> Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an >>> English company. >> >> its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web >> links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in >> Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in >> Bangladesh. yeah, right. Both domains were initially registered >> about a...

On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. > > Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an > English company. its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in Bangladesh. yeah, right. Both domains were initially registered about a month ago. -- john r pierce,...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: > julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > > Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content that > is not suitable for minors. > > It is possible subscribed under different address. > > IP of offending spam : > > Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com > [45.55.128.151])...

----- Original Message ----- | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | Hash: SHA1 | | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com | > | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content | >> that is not suitable for minors. | > | >> It is possible subscribed under different address. | > | >> IP of offending spam : | > | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2....

On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: <<>> something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will.. >> | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com loverhearts.com is a single page that seems to do nothing. and there is nothing in page source to do anything. validator.w3.org shows 1 error and 1 warning showing that page was poorly written. so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. so, to a...

On Wed, August 26, 2015 1:12 am, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com >> >>> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content >>> that is not suitable for minors. >> >>> It is possible subscribed under different address. >> >>> IP of offending spam : >> >>> Received: from mx2.loverhe...

On Tuesday 25 August 2015 14:44:55 Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Does the directory /var/run/clamav-milter/ exist and is it traversable > and writable by the clamav user is running as? > Socket creation mostly doesnt include recursive operation (creating the > directory) It looks like I'm barking up the wrong tree here. When I run the command in the terminal I get [root at

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:53 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Thanks a lot! The most difficult part of this I noticed is to make sure > they responded with report of what discovered and which actions were > taken, and if this didn't happen to have the whole block of IPs registered > to them blocked off (at least this is what I am doing where I can). (1) Not all complaints about

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 17:22 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web > links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in > Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in > Bangladesh. yeah, right. Both domains were initially registered about > a month ago....

On 8/26/2015 5:30 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Easier just to block Digital Ocean for port 25 - as I have previously > done for all port 80 traffic. you realize Digital Ocean is a rather large virtual private server provider? wikipedia says they host over 190,000 sites, and last year surpassed Rackspace to become the 4th largest hosting provider. a blanket block of /16 subnets is

...015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me. >> >> Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an >> English company. > > its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web > links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in > Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in > Bangladesh. yeah, right. Both domains were initially registered > about a month ago digit...