search for: losangeles

*Do FiveThirtyEight, priors and random forests mean more to you than a time of day, entries in a rap sheet, and pristine flora? Read on if that was a yes.* CARD.COM is a well-funded financial startup in Santa Monica, CA. We issue Visa debit cards that connect brands with their fans and enable our customers to make a social statement with their payment. Data and scientific insights are at the core

...nding on where the call originates. For example, I need calls from San Diego (NPA 619 and 858) to to be routed differently than L.A. calls. I tried entries like: exten => 4044633/_619.,1,OurApp,sandiego-queue exten => 4044633/_858.,1,OurApp,sandiego-queue exten => 4044633/_213.,1,OurApp,losangeles-queue exten => 4044633/_.,1,OurApp,default-queue but it didn't seem to work. Every call went to the default queue. I also tried exten => 4044633/_619XXXXXXX,1,OurApp,sandiego-queue to no avail. It did work if I put a specific number in there: exten => 4044633/6193644788,1,OurApp,sa...

Hello, everything goes well on asterisk 1.4.30, but with asterisk 1.6.2.11 I get the following : [Sep 12 18:59:29] WARNING[2066]: chan_sip.c:12738 check_auth: username mismatch, have <329909006666>, digest has <3291119600> [Sep 12 18:59:29] NOTICE[2066]: chan_sip.c:20082 handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate device "0473990000" <sip:0473990000 at

Hmmm.... Can't place calls... Can't access website... Neither of the 3 nameservers answer anything... Anyone heard/know something to explain all this?

Hi all, I have tried to disable anonymous in smb.conf, by include the global: restrict anonymous = true password server = * encrypt passwords = yes null passwords = no Buy when I ran the : ./smbclient -L myserver -N I have this message: added interface ip=111.xx.xx.xx bcast=111.xx.xx.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 Got a positive name query response from 111.xx.xx.xx( 111.xx.xxx.xx)