Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "loess_raw".
Did you mean:
r_loess_raw
2006 Jul 02
1
prefix 'R_' when calling external code
I noticed that in
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/stats/R/loess.R
that we are now calling R_loess_raw, R_lowesw, R_lowesp, etc. I'm
interested to know what is the benefit/reason for the 'R_', as I am
unfamiliar with this prefix and do not see it mentioned in 'Writing R
Extensions.'
Thanks,
Ben
2006 Oct 09
1
[Mac OS X 10.4] object R_loess_raw not found
...ype 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help.
Type 'q()' to quit R.
[Previously saved workspace restored]
> example(loess)
loess> cars.lo <- loess(dist ~ speed, cars)
Error: object "R_loess_raw" not found
I saw this first with a self-built 2.3.1 version, that worked fine
under 10.3 . Hoping that a Tiger build would solve matters, I
installed the fresh 2.4.0 from the downloaded disk image. As you can
see, the error message persists.
Curiously, the ppc/stats.so file somewhere deep i...
2004 Nov 05
0
Ways to catch segfaults before they happen
...e a few package maintainers. A good selection of
the reports will be available at
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/Rvg
for the next week or so. Valgrind is not infallible and sometimes gets
confused by highly optimized code (and these tests were run with -O2): I
reckon this is the case for the loess_raw reports.
`Writing R Extensions' in 2.0.1 will have a section on `writing portable
packages' covering this, and R-devel has a R CMD check --use-valgrind
option to run all the examples/tests/vignettes under valgrind -- beware
that is typically 20x slower.
Another problem area is running...
2005 Jun 18
1
loess returns different standard errors for identical models (PR#7956)
Full_Name: Benjamin Tyner
Version: 2.1.0, 4/18/2005
OS: i686-redhat-linux-gnu
Submission from: (NULL) (4.64.8.220)
# Just run my.test() below in a newly opened R session. Once too many models
have been fit (~20 on my system), the computed standard error jumps to a
different value. This is (superficially) due to a different residual sum of
squares, not a different one.delta. No other aspect of