search for: locked_pag

...100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -1598,11 +1598,10 @@ done: * * 1 is returned if we find something, 0 if nothing was in the tree */ -static noinline u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode, - struct extent_io_tree *tree, - struct page *locked_page, - u64 *start, u64 *end, - u64 max_bytes) +STATIC u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode, + struct extent_io_tree *tree, + struct page *locked_page, u64 *start, + u64 *end, u64 max_bytes) { u64 delalloc_start; u64 delalloc_end; diff --git a/fs/...

...inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -803,14 +803,14 @@ static u64 get_extent_allocation_hint(struct inode *inode, u64 start, * required to start IO on it. It may be clean and already done with * IO when we return. */ -static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode, - struct page *locked_page, - u64 start, u64 end, int *page_started, - unsigned long *nr_written, - int unlock) +static noinline int __cow_file_range(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, + struct inode *inode, + struct btrfs_root *root, + struct page *locked_page, + u64 start,...

...e BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ASYNC_EXTENT 6 /* in memory btrfs inode */ struct btrfs_inode { diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 293c018..aef3054 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -1398,20 +1398,23 @@ static int run_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, int ret; struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; - if (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) + if (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) { ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, page_started, 1, nr_written); - else if (B...

Hi Minchan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160318] [cannot apply to v4.5-rc7 v4.5-rc6 v4.5-rc5 v4.5] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160321-143339 coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>

Hi Minchan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160318] [cannot apply to v4.5-rc7 v4.5-rc6 v4.5-rc5 v4.5] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160321-143339 coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>

...ides the pool into various size classes where each * class maintains a list of zspages where each zspage is divided @@ -1052,6 +1065,44 @@ void lock_zspage(struct page *first_page) } while ((cursor = get_next_page(cursor)) != NULL); } +int trylock_zspage(struct page *first_page, struct page *locked_page) +{ + struct page *cursor, *fail; + + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_page(first_page), first_page); + + for (cursor = first_page; cursor != NULL; cursor = + get_next_page(cursor)) { + if (cursor != locked_page) { + if (!trylock_page(cursor)) { + fail = cursor; + goto unlock; + } + } + } +...

...+2,7 @@ #define __EXTENTIO__ #include <linux/rbtree.h> +#include <linux/bio.h> /* bits for the extent state */ #define EXTENT_DIRTY 1 @@ -300,4 +301,6 @@ int extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(struct inode *inode, struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end, struct page *locked_page, unsigned long op); +extern void access_extent_buffer_page(struct bio_vec *vec, struct extent_buffer *eb, + unsigned long start, unsigned long len); #endif -- 1.6.3.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo...

...nt cow_file_range_async(struct i clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED, 1, 0, NULL, GFP_NOFS); while (start < end) { - async_cow = kmalloc(sizeof(*async_cow), GFP_NOFS); async_cow->inode = inode; async_cow->root = root; async_cow->locked_page = locked_page; @@ -4891,7 +4888,6 @@ static noinline int uncompress_inline(st max_size = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, item); inline_size = btrfs_file_extent_inline_item_len(leaf, btrfs_item_nr(leaf, path->slots[0])); - tmp = kmalloc(inline_size, GFP_NOFS); ptr = btrfs_file_exte...

...> max_bytes && loops) - delalloc_end = delalloc_start + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1; + if (delalloc_end + 1 - delalloc_start > max_bytes) + delalloc_end = delalloc_start + max_bytes - 1; /* step two, lock all the pages after the page that has start */ ret = lock_delalloc_pages(inode, locked_page, @@ -1650,8 +1647,7 @@ again: */ free_extent_state(cached_state); if (!loops) { - unsigned long offset = (*start) & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1); - max_bytes = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset; + max_bytes = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; loops = 1; goto again; } else { -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubs...

...d-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com> --- zsmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ void unlock_zspage(struct page *first_pa VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(cursor), cursor); if (cursor != locked_page) unlock_page(cursor); - }; + } } static void free_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct page *first_page)

...This * makes sure that both compressed inodes and uncompressed inodes - * are written in the same order that pdflush sent them down. + * are written in the same order that the flusher thread sent them + * down. */ static noinline int compress_file_range(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index 643335a..051c7fe 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ void btrfs_start_ordered_extent(struct inode *inode, /* * pages in the range can be dirty, clean or writeback. We *...

...truct rb_node *node; @@ -652,7 +651,6 @@ again: } out: spin_unlock(&tree->lock); - return 0; } static void set_state_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree, @@ -1146,9 +1144,9 @@ out: return found; } -static noinline int __unlock_for_delalloc(struct inode *inode, - struct page *locked_page, - u64 start, u64 end) +static noinline void __unlock_for_delalloc(struct inode *inode, + struct page *locked_page, + u64 start, u64 end) { int ret; struct page *pages[16]; @@ -1158,7 +1156,7 @@ static noinline int __unlock_for_delalloc(struct inode *inode, int i; if...

...if (root->root_key.objectid == + BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) { + ret = btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(inode, cur_offset, + num_bytes); + BUG_ON(ret); + } + extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(inode, &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, cur_offset, cur_offset + num_bytes - 1, locked_page, EXTENT_CLEAR_UNLOCK_PAGE | @@ -6079,16 +6086,15 @@ out_unlock: return err; } -static int prealloc_file_range(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end, - u64 alloc_hint, int mode, loff_t actual_len) +int btrfs_prealloc_file_range(struct inode *inode, int mode, + u64 start, u64 num_by...

...ct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, * because the "write" would invalidate their data. */ if (page->index == last_index) - len = size & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; + len = ((size - 1) & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + 1; ret = ocfs2_write_begin_nolock(mapping, pos, len, 0, &locked_page, &fsdata, di_bh, page); -- 1.7.1.GIT

Hi all, I''m running btrfs in a 3-disk RAID1 configuration. After a hard power-off, I''m seeing a lot of hung I/O tasks on this volume, apparently due to a corrupt leaf. I first noticed the problem on kernel 3.4.7, and it''s persisted with 3.4.8. Relevant parts of the kernel log follow. [ 85.179621] block group 38684065792 has an wrong amount of free space [

...node *inode, loff_t newsize); -static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode); +static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize); static int btrfs_finish_ordered_io(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end); static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, @@ -2230,7 +2230,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root) * btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space to catch offenders. */ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); - ret = btrfs_truncate(inode); + ret = btrfs_truncate(inode, inode->i_size); mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mut...

Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.

Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.

Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.

Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.