Tao Ma
2010-Jul-16 14:21 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: make __ocfs2_page_mkwrite handle file end properly.
__ocfs2_page_mkwrite now is broken in handling file end. 1. the last page should be the page contains i_size - 1. 2. the len in the last page is also calculated wrong. So change them accordingly. Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/mmap.c | 8 +++++--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c index af2b8fe..4c18f4a 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c @@ -74,9 +74,11 @@ static int __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, /* * Another node might have truncated while we were waiting on * cluster locks. + * We don't check size == 0 before the shift. This is borrowed + * from do_generic_file_read. */ - last_index = size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; - if (page->index > last_index) { + last_index = (size - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; + if (unlikely(!size || page->index > last_index)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } @@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, * because the "write" would invalidate their data. */ if (page->index == last_index) - len = size & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; + len = ((size - 1) & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + 1; ret = ocfs2_write_begin_nolock(mapping, pos, len, 0, &locked_page, &fsdata, di_bh, page); -- 1.7.1.GIT
Joel Becker
2010-Jul-16 19:51 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: make __ocfs2_page_mkwrite handle file end properly.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:21:00PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:> __ocfs2_page_mkwrite now is broken in handling file end. > 1. the last page should be the page contains i_size - 1. > 2. the len in the last page is also calculated wrong. > So change them accordingly.How did you determine these broken? They look correct to me, and they passed the mmap testing I ran against the tail zeroing fixes. Comments inline.> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c > index af2b8fe..4c18f4a 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c > @@ -74,9 +74,11 @@ static int __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, > /* > * Another node might have truncated while we were waiting on > * cluster locks. > + * We don't check size == 0 before the shift. This is borrowed > + * from do_generic_file_read. > */ > - last_index = size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; > - if (page->index > last_index) {This original check seems correct. If size is on a page boundary, sure the last_index is past the last page of the file. That's OK, we're checking that page->index isn't greater than that.> @@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, > * because the "write" would invalidate their data. > */ > if (page->index == last_index) > - len = size & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; > + len = ((size - 1) & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + 1;And the len calculation is only broken because you changed what last_index meant. Originally, if the page equals the last_index, size cannot be page aligned, and you are guaranteed a proper len. You know, if you don't like the way last_index reads, we can always steal the ext4 comparison: 5982 if (page->mapping != mapping || size <= page_offset(page) 5983 || !PageUptodate(page)) { 5984 /* page got truncated from under us? */ 5985 goto out_unlock; 5986 } <snip> 5990 5991 if (page->index == size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) 5992 len = size & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; 5993 else 5994 len = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; This is a direct compare on the page_offset, which doesn't confuse anyone about index vs i_size. Later, they directly check "is this page the last in the file" before computing len. Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #15 "Own a great stereo system." Joel Becker Consulting Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127