search for: loadshort

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "loadshort".

Did you mean: loadshorts
2011 Nov 02
3
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this normal? For example: Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return 'int' unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char **llvm_cbe_argv); ^ Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:14: error: first parameter of 'main' (argument count) must be of type 'int' unsigned int main(unsigned...
2011 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
...at 10:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures > > from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this > > normal? > > > > For example: > > Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return > > 'int' > > unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char > > **llvm_cbe_argv); > > Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend? > Good question. I just went into my build director...
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures > from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this > normal? > > For example: > Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return > 'int' > unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char > **llvm_cbe_argv); Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend? -Eli
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
...nkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >>> I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures >>> from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this >>> normal? >>> >>> For example: >>> Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return >>> 'int' >>> unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char >>> **llvm_cbe_argv); >> >> Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend? >> > > Good question. I j...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...em SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-14-AtExit SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-26-Shorts SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-CastToBool SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-06-IntOverflow SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest SingleSource/UnitTests/...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ce/UnitTests/2009-04-16-BitfieldInitialization | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/FloatPrecision | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/DefaultInitDynArrays | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-12-StructureArgs...
2016 Apr 29
2
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug
...ode Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160429/f4c64f9b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- ; opt -early-cse -S < LoadShorts-simple2.ll target triple = "aarch64--linux-gnu" %S1 = type { i32, i32, i16, i16, i8, i8 } define void @test() { entry: %call1 = call noalias i8* @malloc() %0 = bitcast i8* %call1 to %S1* %ui = getelementptr inbounds %S1, %S1* %0, i32 0, i32 0 store i32 undef, i32* %ui, align 4...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0031 548 0.0020 * 0.0020 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0041 1508 0.0059 * 0.0058 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0073 1248 0.0056 * 0.0054...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0040 548 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0040 1512 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0120 1280 0.0040 * 0.0080...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0037 540 0.0016 * 0.0016 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0064 1500 0.0048 * 0.0045 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0037 1272 0.0047 * 0.0045...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0013 568 0.0011 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0018 1532 0.0035 * 0.0034 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0049 2340 0.0052 * 0.0148...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest                             | > 0.0000 592      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts                             | > 0.0100 1520     0.0000      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.01 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs                             | > 0.0200 1676     0.0100      *          ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08- > BitOpsTest | 0.0000 592 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09- > LoadShorts | 0.0100 1520 0.0000 > * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09- > SignedArgs | 0.0200 1676 0.0100 &g...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...4102 2003-06-13-Crasher.ll 4 1886 0 0.01 1870 0 0.01 1870 2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer.ll 1 883 0 0.01 871 0 0.01 871 2003-06-16-VolatileError.ll 1 857 0 0.01 845 0 0.01 845 2003-07-06-IntOverflow.ll 5 6583 0 0.01 6574 0 0.01 7412 2003-07-08-BitOpsTest.ll 2 4018 0 0.01 4009 0 0.01 4009 2003-07-09-LoadShorts.ll 2 22686 0 0.01 22677 0 0.01 22677 2003-07-09-SignedArgs.ll 4 19145 0 0.01 19136 0 0.01 19136 2003-07-10-SignConversions.ll 3 4961 0 0.01 4952 0 0.01 4952 2003-08-05-CastFPToUint.ll 4 3762 0 0.01 3753 0 0.01 3753 2003-08-11-VaListArg.ll 4 25506 0 0.01 25497 0 0.01 25497 2003-08-20-EnumSizeProble...