Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "loadshorts".
2011 Nov 02
3
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures
from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this
normal?
For example:
Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return
'int'
unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char
**llvm_cbe_argv);
^
Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:14: error: first parameter of
'main' (argument count) must be of type 'int'
unsigned int main(unsigned...
2011 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
...at 10:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> > I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures
> > from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this
> > normal?
> >
> > For example:
> > Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return
> > 'int'
> > unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char
> > **llvm_cbe_argv);
>
> Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend?
>
Good question. I just went into my build directory...
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures
> from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this
> normal?
>
> For example:
> Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return
> 'int'
> unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char
> **llvm_cbe_argv);
Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend?
-Eli
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] test suite and int main
...nkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>> I'm just setting up the test suite, and I'm seeing a lot of failures
>>> from main() not returning int, etc. in some of the tests. Is this
>>> normal?
>>>
>>> For example:
>>> Output/2003-07-09-LoadShorts.cbe.c:117:1: error: 'main' must return
>>> 'int'
>>> unsigned int main(unsigned int llvm_cbe_argc, unsigned char
>>> **llvm_cbe_argv);
>>
>> Why are you trying to run the test suite using the C backend?
>>
>
> Good question. I ju...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...em
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-14-AtExit
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-26-Shorts
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-CastToBool
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-06-IntOverflow
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ce/UnitTests/2009-04-16-BitfieldInitialization | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/FloatPrecision | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/DefaultInitDynArrays | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-12-StructureArgs...
2016 Apr 29
2
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug
...ode Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160429/f4c64f9b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
; opt -early-cse -S < LoadShorts-simple2.ll
target triple = "aarch64--linux-gnu"
%S1 = type { i32, i32, i16, i16, i8, i8 }
define void @test() {
entry:
%call1 = call noalias i8* @malloc()
%0 = bitcast i8* %call1 to %S1*
%ui = getelementptr inbounds %S1, %S1* %0, i32 0, i32 0
store i32 undef, i32* %ui, align 4...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0031 548 0.0020 * 0.0020 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0041 1508 0.0059 * 0.0058 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0073 1248 0.0056 * 0.0054...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0040 548 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0040 1512 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0120 1280 0.0040 * 0.0080...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0037 540 0.0016 * 0.0016 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0064 1500 0.0048 * 0.0045 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0037 1272 0.0047 * 0.0045...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest | 0.0013 568 0.0011 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | 0.0018 1532 0.0035 * 0.0034 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs | 0.0049 2340 0.0052 * 0.0148...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest |
> 0.0000 592 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts |
> 0.0100 1520 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.01
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs |
> 0.0200 1676 0.0100 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-
> BitOpsTest | 0.0000 592 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-
> LoadShorts | 0.0100 1520 0.0000
> * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 *
> 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-
> SignedArgs | 0.0200 1676 0.0100
>...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...4102
2003-06-13-Crasher.ll 4 1886 0 0.01 1870 0 0.01 1870
2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer.ll 1 883 0 0.01 871 0 0.01 871
2003-06-16-VolatileError.ll 1 857 0 0.01 845 0 0.01 845
2003-07-06-IntOverflow.ll 5 6583 0 0.01 6574 0 0.01 7412
2003-07-08-BitOpsTest.ll 2 4018 0 0.01 4009 0 0.01 4009
2003-07-09-LoadShorts.ll 2 22686 0 0.01 22677 0 0.01 22677
2003-07-09-SignedArgs.ll 4 19145 0 0.01 19136 0 0.01 19136
2003-07-10-SignConversions.ll 3 4961 0 0.01 4952 0 0.01 4952
2003-08-05-CastFPToUint.ll 4 3762 0 0.01 3753 0 0.01 3753
2003-08-11-VaListArg.ll 4 25506 0 0.01 25497 0 0.01 25497
2003-08-20-EnumSizeProblem...