Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "lo_flags".
Did you mean:
bo_flags
2019 Oct 31
0
[PATCH 2/2] loop: switch to linux/loop.h
...4C04
-#define LOOP_GET_STATUS64 0x4C05
-
-#define LO_NAME_SIZE 64
-#define LO_KEY_SIZE 32
-
-struct loop_info {
- int lo_number;
- __kernel_old_dev_t lo_device;
- unsigned long lo_inode;
- __kernel_old_dev_t lo_rdevice;
- int lo_offset;
- int lo_encrypt_type;
- int lo_encrypt_key_size;
- int lo_flags;
- char lo_name[LO_NAME_SIZE];
- unsigned char lo_encrypt_key[LO_KEY_SIZE];
- unsigned long lo_init[2];
- char reserved[4];
-};
-
-/*
- * Where to get __u8, __u32, __u64? Let us use unsigned char/int/long long
- * and get punished when someone comes with 128-bit long longs.
- */
-struct loop_info...
2019 Nov 05
0
[klibc:master] loop: switch to linux/loop.h
...efine LOOP_SET_STATUS64 0x4C04
-#define LOOP_GET_STATUS64 0x4C05
-
-#define LO_NAME_SIZE 64
-#define LO_KEY_SIZE 32
-
-struct loop_info {
- int lo_number;
- dev_t lo_device;
- unsigned long lo_inode;
- dev_t lo_rdevice;
- int lo_offset;
- int lo_encrypt_type;
- int lo_encrypt_key_size;
- int lo_flags;
- char lo_name[LO_NAME_SIZE];
- unsigned char lo_encrypt_key[LO_KEY_SIZE];
- unsigned long lo_init[2];
- char reserved[4];
-};
-
-/*
- * Where to get __u8, __u32, __u64? Let us use unsigned char/int/long long
- * and get punished when someone comes with 128-bit long longs.
- */
-struct loop_info...
2019 Nov 05
0
[klibc:master] losetup: Delete fallbacks to LOOP_{GET, SET}_STATUS
..._device = info64->lo_device;
- info->lo_inode = info64->lo_inode;
- info->lo_rdevice = info64->lo_rdevice;
- info->lo_offset = info64->lo_offset;
- info->lo_encrypt_type = info64->lo_encrypt_type;
- info->lo_encrypt_key_size = info64->lo_encrypt_key_size;
- info->lo_flags = info64->lo_flags;
- info->lo_init[0] = info64->lo_init[0];
- info->lo_init[1] = info64->lo_init[1];
- if (info->lo_encrypt_type == LO_CRYPT_CRYPTOAPI)
- memcpy(info->lo_name, info64->lo_crypt_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
- else
- memcpy(info->lo_name, info64->lo_file_name,...
2019 Oct 31
3
[PATCH 1/2] loop: fix loop_info struct
Otherwise, stack can be corrupted resulting in incorrect runtime
behaviour. For example, overriding argc from main().
References: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1850184
Signed-off-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson at ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com>
---
2010 Mar 14
0
[patches] klibc review unsorted patch queue
...efine LOOP_SET_STATUS64 0x4C04
+#define LOOP_GET_STATUS64 0x4C05
+
+#define LO_NAME_SIZE 64
+#define LO_KEY_SIZE 32
+
+struct loop_info {
+ int lo_number;
+ dev_t lo_device;
+ unsigned long lo_inode;
+ dev_t lo_rdevice;
+ int lo_offset;
+ int lo_encrypt_type;
+ int lo_encrypt_key_size;
+ int lo_flags;
+ char lo_name[LO_NAME_SIZE];
+ unsigned char lo_encrypt_key[LO_KEY_SIZE];
+ unsigned long lo_init[2];
+ char reserved[4];
+};
+
+/*
+ * Where to get __u8, __u32, __u64? Let us use unsigned char/int/long long
+ * and get punished when someone comes with 128-bit long longs.
+ */
+struct loop_info...
2006 Mar 17
1
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode / current process=12 (swi1: net)
this is 6.0-STABLE as for Mar 17.
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #2: Fri Mar 17 11:05:32 UTC 2006
vlad@host:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/DEF_WEB
Timecounter
2008 Jul 22
4
"sleeping without queue" ?
Hello!
My attempt to build openoffice.org-3 seems to be hanging. Pressing
Ctrl-T produces:
load: 0.11 cmd: tcsh 79759 [sleeping without queue] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 0k
(tcsh is used by OOo's build-script). What is this "sleeping without
queue" state, and why is process in it for so long?
This is an 4-CPU amd64 system with 4Gb of RAM. Only 16% of the swap is
currently in use and