Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "lmde5".
Did you mean:
lmde
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...quot; on a user that exists locally and in the
> domain I get the list of groups of both local + domain concatenated as
> one long list.
>
> Would it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>
> - Kees.
>
OK, I should have posted that as well:
adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
uid=13105(unixuser) gid=10513(domain users) groups=10513(domain
users),13105(unixuser),3001(BUILTIN\users)
Still think th...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...>> domain I get the list of groups of both local + domain concatenated
>> as one long list.
>>
>> Would it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>>
>> - Kees.
>
>>
>
> OK, I should have posted that as well:
>
> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
> uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
> groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
> users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
>
> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
> uid=13105(unixuser) gid=10513(domain users) groups=10513(domain
> users),13105(unixuser),3...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...both local + domain concatenated
>>> as one long list.
>>>
>>> Would it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>>>
>>> - Kees.
>>
>>>
>>
>> OK, I should have posted that as well:
>>
>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
>> uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
>> groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
>> users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
>>
>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
>> uid=13105(unixuser) gid=10513(domain users) groups=10513(domain
>&...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...gt;> as one long list.
>>>>
>>>> Would it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>>>>
>>>> - Kees.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK, I should have posted that as well:
>>>
>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
>>> uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
>>> groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
>>> users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
>>>
>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
>>> uid=13105(unixuser) gid=10513(domain users) gr...
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...ba will create SID's 'S-1-2-*' for
local users, but they are not true Windows SID's.
If you create a local user on a domain joined machine and then create a
domain user (on a DC) with the same name and then use getent on the
joined machine, you will get this output:
adminuser at lmde5:~$ getent passwd unixuser
unixuser:x:1001:1001:,,,:/home/unixuser:/bin/bash
adminuser at lmde5:~$ getent passwd SAMDOM\\unixuser
SAMDOM\unixuser:*:13105:10513::/home/unixuser:/bin/bash
You have to use the username in the form 'DOMAIN\\username' to get the
domain users output, otherwise yo...
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...;S-1-2-*' for
> local users, but they are not true Windows SID's.
>
> If you create a local user on a domain joined machine and then create
> a domain user (on a DC) with the same name and then use getent on the
> joined machine, you will get this output:
> adminuser at lmde5:~$ getent passwd unixuser
> unixuser:x:1001:1001:,,,:/home/unixuser:/bin/bash
> adminuser at lmde5:~$ getent passwd SAMDOM\\unixuser
> SAMDOM\unixuser:*:13105:10513::/home/unixuser:/bin/bash
>
> You have to use the username in the form 'DOMAIN\\username' to get the
> doma...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...t;>
>>>>> Would it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Kees.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, I should have posted that as well:
>>>>
>>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
>>>> uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
>>>> groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
>>>> users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
>>>>
>>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
>>>> uid=13105(unixuser) gi...
2024 Nov 18
2
samba-tool computer delete does not work
hi,
I have to delete about 6000 old machine accounts.
samba-tool computer delete RESERVE23 does not end.
when I interrupt it with CRTL + C, the PC is deleted.
deleting the computer accounts with RSAT works.
can i also delete the computer accounts with ldapdelete?
Version 4.21.1
regards,
heinz
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
Hi!
We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local /etc/password:
this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since winbindd is
started later than most services are (and it requires working network). Also,
user-defined cron @reboot jobs aren't being run, for the same reason: cron is
stared before winbindd on most systems. This is quite difficult to
2023 May 15
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...d it be viewed as two separate users that would not happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Kees.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I should have posted that as well:
>>>>>
>>>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id unixuser
>>>>> uid=1001(unixuser) gid=1001(unixuser)
>>>>> groups=1001(unixuser),13105(unixuser),10513(domain
>>>>> users),3001(BUILTIN\users)
>>>>>
>>>>> adminuser at lmde5:~$ id SAMDOM\\unixuser
>>>>>...