Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "llvm_version_patch".
2015 Feb 27
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] CMake: Use LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of hardcoded "svn" string
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com>
---
CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 0)
set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX svn)
if (NOT PACKAGE_VERSION)
- set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}svn")
+ set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX}")
endif()...
2020 May 20
3
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
...alls now.
>
I have build from the below tarball.
But the version-strings look odd.
First I added...
--- llvm-project-10.0.1rc1/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-19
21:16:37.000000000 +0200
+++ llvm-project/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 18:02:42.443960091 +0200
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH)
set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1)
endif()
if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX)
- set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "")
+ set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "rc1")
endif()
That lead to strange so-lib-names like *.so.10rc1 which is not wanted.
I hacked around LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX stuff.
Here is the...
2015 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] CMake: Use LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of hardcoded "svn" string
...<sedat.dilek at gmail.com>
> ---
> CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
> index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644
> --- a/CMakeLists.txt
> +++ b/CMakeLists.txt
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 0)
> set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX svn)
>
> if (NOT PACKAGE_VERSION)
> - set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}svn")
> + set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}${LLVM_VERSION_SU...
2020 May 21
2
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
...g.
- Sedat -
> -Tom
>
> > First I added...
> >
> > --- llvm-project-10.0.1rc1/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-19
> > 21:16:37.000000000 +0200
> > +++ llvm-project/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 18:02:42.443960091 +0200
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH)
> > set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1)
> > endif()
> > if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX)
> > - set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "")
> > + set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "rc1")
> > endif()
> >
> > That lead to strange so-lib-names like *.so.10rc1...
2020 May 20
3
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
Hi Tom,
thanks and congrats for LLVM 10.0.1-rc1 release.
[1] shows 2 assets.
10.0.0 RCs had a lot of more assets.
I am missing the llvm-project-10.0.1rc1.tar.xz tarball.
Will you provide them later or is there a new development/workflow
decision I do not know of?
BTW, the source zip and tar.gz tarballs show no sizes.
I am using Mobile LTE/UMTS to download stuff from the Internet.
For now I
2020 May 21
5
Understanding the version handling in LLVM/Clang/LLD
...ecified, use it, if not use LLVM_VERSION_*.
+if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_MAJOR)
+ set(LLD_VERSION_MAJOR ${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR})
+endif()
+if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_MINOR)
+ set(LLD_VERSION_MINOR ${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR})
+endif()
+if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL)
+ set(LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL ${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH})
+endif()
+if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX)
+ set(LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX ${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX})
+endif()
+# LLD_VERSION includes LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX.
+set(LLD_VERSION
"${LLD_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLD_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL}${LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX}")
message(STATUS "LLD ver...
2016 Jun 27
2
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
...the release_38 Git branch?
> ( I generated source-tarballs out of my local Git repositories, see below. )
[ llvm.src/CMakeLists.txt ]
...
if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR)
set(LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR 3)
endif()
if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MINOR)
set(LLVM_VERSION_MINOR 8)
endif()
if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH)
set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1)
endif()
if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX)
set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "")
endif()
...
[ llvm.src/autoconf/configure.ac ]
...
AC_INIT([LLVM],[3.8.0],[http://llvm.org/bugs/])
LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR=3
LLVM_VERSION_MINOR=8
LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0
LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX=
....
2016 Jun 27
0
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38
>> branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored.
>>
>> Source tarballs will be available upon the
2016 Jun 26
3
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38
> branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored.
>
> Source tarballs will be available upon the release.
Which are just coming, now that final has been tested successfully. :)
They'll be announced in the
2018 Mar 28
2
5.0.2-rc1 tagged
Hi,
I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin.
-Tom
2018 Mar 28
0
[Release-testers] 5.0.2-rc1 tagged
On 28/03/2018 07:19, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin.
LLVM_VERSION_PATCH is set to "1". Is that normal? (I was expecting "2").
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_502/rc1/CMakeLists.txt?revision=328512&view=markup#29
Thanks
Sylvestre
2015 Feb 07
5
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...XTN_LIB=1 -D _GNU_SOURCE -D USE_SSE41 -D DEBUG -D
USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D
HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D
GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D
HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0
-D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D
"MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I
../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include
-internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem
/opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6.0rc2/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include
-internal...
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...1 -D DEBUG -D
>> USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D
>> HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D
>> GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D
>> HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0
>> -D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D
>> "MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I
>> ../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include
>> -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem
>> /opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6....
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...1 -D DEBUG -D
>> USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D
>> HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D
>> GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D
>> HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0
>> -D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D
>> "MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I
>> ../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include
>> -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem
>> /opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6....