search for: llvm_version_patch

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "llvm_version_patch".

2015 Feb 27
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] CMake: Use LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of hardcoded "svn" string
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> --- CMakeLists.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 0) set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX svn) if (NOT PACKAGE_VERSION) - set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}svn") + set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX}") endif()...
2020 May 20
3
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
...alls now. > I have build from the below tarball. But the version-strings look odd. First I added... --- llvm-project-10.0.1rc1/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-19 21:16:37.000000000 +0200 +++ llvm-project/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 18:02:42.443960091 +0200 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH) set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1) endif() if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX) - set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "") + set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "rc1") endif() That lead to strange so-lib-names like *.so.10rc1 which is not wanted. I hacked around LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX stuff. Here is the...
2015 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] CMake: Use LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of hardcoded "svn" string
...<sedat.dilek at gmail.com> > --- > CMakeLists.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644 > --- a/CMakeLists.txt > +++ b/CMakeLists.txt > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 0) > set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX svn) > > if (NOT PACKAGE_VERSION) > - set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}svn") > + set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}${LLVM_VERSION_SU...
2020 May 21
2
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
...g. - Sedat - > -Tom > > > First I added... > > > > --- llvm-project-10.0.1rc1/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-19 > > 21:16:37.000000000 +0200 > > +++ llvm-project/llvm/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 18:02:42.443960091 +0200 > > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH) > > set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1) > > endif() > > if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX) > > - set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "") > > + set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "rc1") > > endif() > > > > That lead to strange so-lib-names like *.so.10rc1...
2020 May 20
3
10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged
Hi Tom, thanks and congrats for LLVM 10.0.1-rc1 release. [1] shows 2 assets. 10.0.0 RCs had a lot of more assets. I am missing the llvm-project-10.0.1rc1.tar.xz tarball. Will you provide them later or is there a new development/workflow decision I do not know of? BTW, the source zip and tar.gz tarballs show no sizes. I am using Mobile LTE/UMTS to download stuff from the Internet. For now I
2020 May 21
5
Understanding the version handling in LLVM/Clang/LLD
...ecified, use it, if not use LLVM_VERSION_*. +if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_MAJOR) + set(LLD_VERSION_MAJOR ${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}) +endif() +if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_MINOR) + set(LLD_VERSION_MINOR ${LLVM_VERSION_MINOR}) +endif() +if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL) + set(LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL ${LLVM_VERSION_PATCH}) +endif() +if(NOT DEFINED LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX) + set(LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX ${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX}) +endif() +# LLD_VERSION includes LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX. +set(LLD_VERSION "${LLD_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LLD_VERSION_MINOR}.${LLD_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL}${LLD_VERSION_SUFFIX}") message(STATUS "LLD ver...
2016 Jun 27
2
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
...the release_38 Git branch? > ( I generated source-tarballs out of my local Git repositories, see below. ) [ llvm.src/CMakeLists.txt ] ... if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR) set(LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR 3) endif() if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MINOR) set(LLVM_VERSION_MINOR 8) endif() if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_PATCH) set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 1) endif() if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX) set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "") endif() ... [ llvm.src/autoconf/configure.ac ] ... AC_INIT([LLVM],[3.8.0],[http://llvm.org/bugs/]) LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR=3 LLVM_VERSION_MINOR=8 LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0 LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX= ....
2016 Jun 27
0
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38 >> branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored. >> >> Source tarballs will be available upon the
2016 Jun 26
3
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38 > branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored. > > Source tarballs will be available upon the release. Which are just coming, now that final has been tested successfully. :) They'll be announced in the
2018 Mar 28
2
5.0.2-rc1 tagged
Hi, I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin. -Tom
2018 Mar 28
0
[Release-testers] 5.0.2-rc1 tagged
On 28/03/2018 07:19, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin. LLVM_VERSION_PATCH is set to "1". Is that normal? (I was expecting "2"). http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_502/rc1/CMakeLists.txt?revision=328512&view=markup#29 Thanks Sylvestre
2015 Feb 07
5
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...XTN_LIB=1 -D _GNU_SOURCE -D USE_SSE41 -D DEBUG -D USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0 -D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D "MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I ../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem /opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6.0rc2/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include -internal...
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...1 -D DEBUG -D >> USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D >> HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D >> GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D >> HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0 >> -D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D >> "MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I >> ../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include >> -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem >> /opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6....
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
...1 -D DEBUG -D >> USE_X86_64_ASM -D HAVE_XLOCALE_H -D HAVE_STRTOF -D HAVE_DLOPEN -D >> HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -D HAVE_LIBDRM -D GLX_USE_DRM -D HAVE_LIBUDEV -D >> GLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -D GLX_USE_TLS -D >> HAVE_ALIAS -D HAVE_MINCORE -D HAVE_LLVM=0x0306 -D LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0 >> -D MAPI_MODE_GLAPI -D >> "MAPI_ABI_HEADER=\"shared-glapi/glapi_mapi_tmp.h\"" -I . -I >> ../../include -I ../../src/mapi -I ../../src/mapi -I /opt/xorg/include >> -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem >> /opt/llvm-toolchain-3.6....