search for: llvm_regexec

...l provide consistent behaviour and >> execution time, the system one will not. > > Hi Edwin, > > Can you propose the openbsd implementation as a patch to lib/support? > > -Chris Attached is a proposed patch. The Regex class is a fairly simple wrapper around the llvm_regcomp/llvm_regexec functions, maybe the interface could be improved, right now I just focused on getting it to work. Also the OpenBSD implementation has some extensions (see docs/regex.7), if they are useful those can be added to the Regex class also. A summary of changes from OpenBSD version: - rename functions an...

...pport/regexec.c:130: /Volumes/Data/Users/ddunbar/llvm/lib/Support/regengine.inc: In function 'lbackref': /Volumes/Data/Users/ddunbar/llvm/lib/Support/regengine.inc:665: warning: control reaches end of non-void function /Volumes/Data/Users/ddunbar/llvm/lib/Support/regexec.c: In function 'llvm_regexec': /Volumes/Data/Users/ddunbar/llvm/lib/Support/regexec.c:157: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned -- And one in the unittest: -- /Volumes/Data/Users/ddunbar/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h: In function 'testing::AssertionResult testing::internal::CmpHelperE...

On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > If LLVM is going to have an integrated regex library I suggest using > it > regardless if the platform has one. > The LLVM integrated regex library will provide consistent behaviour > and > execution time, the system one will not. Hi Edwin, Can you propose the openbsd implementation as a patch to lib/support? -Chris

...irectory I still get the same error. llvm[2]: Compiling regexec.c for Release build /root/software/llvm-3.0.obj/_distcheckdir/llvm-3.0/lib/Support/regexec.c:82:25: error: regengine.inc: No such file or directory /root/software/llvm-3.0.obj/_distcheckdir/llvm-3.0/lib/Support/regexec.c: In function ‘llvm_regexec’: /root/software/llvm-3.0.obj/_distcheckdir/llvm-3.0/lib/Support/regexec.c:159: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘smatcher’ /root/software/llvm-3.0.obj/_distcheckdir/llvm-3.0/lib/Support/regexec.c:161: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘lmatcher’ make[2]: *** [/root/software/llvm-3...

On 2009-08-27 09:06, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > 2009/8/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: > >> On 2009-08-25 21:18, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >>> Woot! Thanks a bunch Edwin! >>> >>> Some comments on the patch: >>> -- >>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to import the man pages, if we only >>> expose Regex.h.

2009/8/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: > On 2009-08-25 21:18, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Woot! Thanks a bunch Edwin! >> >> Some comments on the patch: >> -- >> I'm not sure if it makes sense to import the man pages, if we only >> expose Regex.h. >> > > I'd like to keep re_format.7, it describes the format of the regex as >

...execution time, the system one will not. >> >> Hi Edwin, >> >> Can you propose the openbsd implementation as a patch to lib/support? >> >> -Chris > > Attached is a proposed patch. > The Regex class is a fairly simple wrapper around the > llvm_regcomp/llvm_regexec functions, > maybe the interface could be improved, right now I just focused on > getting it to work. > Also the OpenBSD implementation has some extensions (see docs/regex.7), > if they are useful those can be added to the Regex class also. > > A summary of changes from OpenBSD ve...