Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "llvm_empty_ti".
Did you mean:
llvm_empty_ty
2014 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] How to 'define and use' a LOOP intrinsic that takes "iteration count" and the "label" to jump to ?
I have defined the intrinsic as
* def int_loop: Intrinsic<[],[llvm_i8_ty, llvm_empty_ty],[]>;*
and also got the Codegen backend support in Instructioninfo.td file.
Then created a .ll file to test it.
The .ll file is like this
*declare void @llvm.loop(i8, label)define void @fn() nounwind readnone
{entry: ..... ..... call void @llvm.loop(i8 10, label %entry) ret
void}*
But
2008 May 07
2
[LLVMdev] Creation of Intrinsics with Pointer Return Types
<table cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' border='0' ><tr><td style='font: inherit;'>Hi,<br>I tried creating intrinsics which are to be<br>placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in HW).<br>These intrinsics are to take care of the data dependencies of the set of
2008 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] Creation of Intrinsics with Pointer Return Types
Hello,
LLVM's intrinsic overloading mechanism does not currently support
overloading on pointer types. Patches to implement this would be
welcome.
Dan
On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried creating intrinsics which are to be
> placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a
> basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in
2007 Feb 05
0
[LLVMdev] automatically generating intrinsic declarations
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Dan Gohman wrote:
> LLVM knows what all the types of the intrinsic functions are; I thought,
> why are users (including llvm-gcc...) required to duplicate all this
> information in order to use them? I mean in order to call
> getOrInsertFunction to get declarations for them.
That is an excellent question! :) In the bad old days, we used to allow
intrinsics
2007 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] automatically generating intrinsic declarations
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:28:56PM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
> > LLVM knows what all the types of the intrinsic functions are; I thought,
> > why are users (including llvm-gcc...) required to duplicate all this
> > information in order to use them? I mean in order to call
> > getOrInsertFunction to get declarations for
2007 Feb 05
2
[LLVMdev] automatically generating intrinsic declarations
LLVM knows what all the types of the intrinsic functions are; I thought,
why are users (including llvm-gcc...) required to duplicate all this
information in order to use them? I mean in order to call getOrInsertFunction
to get declarations for them.
So I wrote this patch, which allows all this code to be generated
automatically. Is this a good approach?
Dan
--
Dan Gohman, Cray Inc. <djg at