search for: llm

Hi, I would like to add a color under a lm line and not the plotted line. Is this possible? In the example, I do not want the area under the curve red, but rather under the llm line. x=seq(0,5,len=100) y=-(x-5)^2 llm<-lm(y~x) plot(x,y) polygon(c(x,x[length(x)]), c(y, y[1]), col='red') abline(llm) keith -- M. Keith Cox, Ph.D. Alaska NOAA Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratories 17109 Pt. Lena Loop Rd. Juneau, AK 99801 Keith.Cox@noaa...

On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:27 -0500, Blake McBride wrote: > Greetings, > > I have used the nouveau driver with my Nvidia card on Linux.? Works > fine.? However, my problem has to do with running LLM on my GPU with > your driver.? My impression is, it doesn't work.? Am I correct? Yo, "it doesn't work" is not a very precise error description. The maintainers will need info such as: Which kernel version, what payload, how's the payload invoked and what is the observed...

Greetings, I have used the nouveau driver with my Nvidia card on Linux. Works fine. However, my problem has to do with running LLM on my GPU with your driver. My impression is, it doesn't work. Am I correct? Given today's environment, this may be a good FAQ. Thanks! Blake McBride -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attach...

...believe the language does allow "undefined behavior" if there's > a use of pT when the pointed-to object isn't actually of type T. It's > an invalid use in that case, right? Yes, but not for an arbitrary pointer which aliases pT. That's why it's a problem that llm.invariant is specified in terms of memory; if we get a pointer that we can prove aliases the invariant memory, we start making assumptions we aren't allowed to make. This C++ code might be well-formed, depending on what 'foo' does to its argument: A *a = new A(); a->~A(); B *...

...orking on helping our NaCl users transition to WebAssembly and new web APIs that cover the functionality offered by NaCl. In terms of actually turning down the platform features, we recently announced a timeline at https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html. In terms of LLM, I would prefer to keep the support we have in the tree until we complete the turndown as long as the support isn't unusually onerous. Not all of our NaCl toolchain code is upstream, but we are actually about to redo part of our current downstream code soon to improve Chromium's C++ support...

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:49 PM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: >>> Kenneth Uildriks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You're right, I hadn't thought this through. The whole point of making

...oes allow "undefined behavior" if there's >> a use of pT when the pointed-to object isn't actually of type T.  It's >> an invalid use in that case, right? > > Yes, but not for an arbitrary pointer which aliases pT.  That's why it's > a problem that llm.invariant is specified in terms of memory;  if we get > a pointer that we can prove aliases the invariant memory, we start > making assumptions we aren't allowed to make. > > This C++ code might be well-formed, depending on what 'foo' does to its > argument: >  A *a =...

...et ValueID of a subclass of Value. For example, given an AllocationInst, it can return the allocation size, and other accessing methods for different kinds of Instructions. To generate names for unnamed values, the patch also makes SlotTracker visibly from ./lib/VMCore/AsmWriter.cpp to ./include/llm/Assembly/Writer.h. Such bindings are defined at ./binding/OCaml/llvm with other changes at ./lib/VMCore/Core.cpp ./include/llvm-c/Core.h 2) also more bindings to parse data layout. The existing methods in llvm::TargetData do not allow to get back contents from llvm::TargetData::Align...

...ine (which is where I'm typing the command line), it would be so nice if the source machine would NOT pass the option on to the receiver (or at least, not barf when it doesn't work). Any way to do this? Thanks! -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs at ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

...functionality offered by NaCl. In terms of actually turning down the platform features, we recently announced a timeline at https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html <https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html>. > > In terms of LLM, I would prefer to keep the support we have in the tree until we complete the turndown as long as the support isn't unusually onerous. Not all of our NaCl toolchain code is upstream, but we are actually about to redo part of our current downstream code soon to improve Chromium's C++ support...

...ystem-4 path0 rsync -azPv -u path-to-system-5 path0 and then rm -rf "path-to-system-?", and hope for the best. What kind of disaster can I look forward to with this approach, and is there a better one? Thanks! -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs at ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

...nk for FAQ#30 is broken; it points to file:///vfat/Shorewall-docs/FAQ.htm#faq30, which goes nowhere on my system. Can anyone enlighten me on what''s going on here? The zone transfers seem all successful, by the way. -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, EA, LLM awacs@egps.com Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Hi all, LLVM/Clang supports an OS called 'NaCl' (llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h). It apparently hasn't had any development since 2015. This page https://developer.chrome.com/native-client/migration mentions that NaCl is deprecated. Is it still used? If not, I would propose that we remove it. I created a patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D78441 which I think can delete 90% of the

Please, can anybody show me the required steps for running the LLVM regression tests, or point me to a detailed doc? I read the available documentation in https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html <https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html> but that's mostly a general description on what’s available rather than an “guide”. This is what I tried: - Installed both LLVM and CLANG using

...INDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 I suppose I''m missing something here. If the rule is not being processed, why indicate that it is? And if it is a syntax error, why not just say so? So, is this a bug or a feature? -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, EA, LLM awacs@egps.com Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://yankel.com Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants