search for: livingstone

Thanks, David. I'd be happy to add the bindings .. is there a general way we add them? Or do you just scrub the API and make sensible judgements to the API? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I

Are you saying the textual form of IR can change, but bitcode doesn't? I don't know what you mean by assembly syntax. Is there a changlog entry when the textual IR changes? On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Jeremy Lakeman <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com> wrote: > Assembly syntax can and will break between versions. But bitcode should > generally be upgradeable, or a bug should

...ontains Y, not X. This relationship has some physical justification. I assume that these two approaches are not equivalent, is this correct? I assume the Box Cox approach (profile likelihood) is better, is this correct and why? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Paul. Paul Livingstone Statistical Analyst AeroStructures® Level 14, 222 Kings Way South Melbourne, Vic, 3205 Phone: 03 9694 1083 Mobile: 0418 121 530 Fax: 03 9696 8195 Email: paul.livingstone@aerostructures.com.au Web: www.aerostructures.com.au [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...could be done easily using just the keyboard, with up-arrow, shift-end or shift-home, ctrl-c, etc. But in R, the shift key doesn't select text. The only way I can select text in R is with the mouse. Does anyone know how to select text in R using only the keyboard? Many thanks, Paul. Paul Livingstone Statistical Analyst AeroStructures? Level 14, 222 Kingsway South Melbourne, Vic, 3205 Phone: 03 9694 1083 Mobile: 0418 121 530 Fax: 03 9696 8195 Email: paul.livingstone at aerostructures.com.au Web: www.aerostructures.com.au

Hi all, I have this code: new Ajax.Request(''non_existant.file'', { onSuccess:function(){alert("yay");}, onFailure:function(){alert("boo");} }); Why does the onFailure alert never get called? It works fine if I use a real file (onSuccess gets called). Thanks, Douglas

This is also happening when using the C++ APIs. It looks like an MCJIT and SetGC interaction. I'm lost on how to proceed further. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > The erlang was a typo, I was trying things out. > > I've updated the bug with a C program, which exhibits the problem. > > To answer your question,

This is my module's dump, which is different than yours. I wonder how I can get the external thing for my function. define double @sum(double, double) { entry: call void @FooBar() %tmp = fadd double %0, %1 ret double %tmp } ; ModuleID = 'My_Module' define double @sum(double, double) { entry: call void @FooBar() %tmp = fadd double %0, %1 ret double %tmp } declare void

Thanks, Reid. I'm not an optimization expert, but as a workaround, can I do the following: void myFunction() { int local = global; .. use local ... } ? On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > This came up in the past for GHC, and we recommended passing it as a > parameter everywhere, as it lets the register allocator spill it under high

It is wholly self-contained. It's code that has no references to anything beyond a set of pointers passed in as arguments to the function. This piece of code doesn't do any OS work at all. It is purely calling function pointers, doing math and allocating memory. On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 12:57 AM Jorg Brown <jorg.brown at gmail.com> wrote: > > Qs for you: > > The code that

I will build LLVM locally, debug and report back. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > I've just started using the llvm-pdbutil tool. Great job on the general tool. > > But I'm having trouble figuring out how the output of the dump tool > relates to real addresses in memory or for that matter relative > virtual address

Hello, I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings? Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major features are added? Hayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/061f5949/attachment.html>

On Mon, 21 May 2018, Hayden Livingston wrote: > So are you saying that LLVM can be built as ARM64 on Windows now? > CMake doesn't show me an option for ARM64 when using MSVC on Windows. > I have the latest CMake. I'm saying that LLVM can produce code for the Windows/ARM64 target. As for compiling LLVM itself to run on ARM64 on Windows, I don't know how to configure MSVC to

I'm on a mission to generate code that can be loaded from disk without any modifications. This means no relocations can occur. Trying to see if this can be done for C++ code that uses STL but has no global variables, and a single function, but of course Clang will generate more functions for STL code. I want to provide an array of function pointers so that for all interactions STL needs to

Historically? I implemented support for exceptions back in LLVM 3.3, before LLVM had an implementation of a Windows unwinder. Currently? As recent as LLVM 4.0, I don't think the JIT was fully capable of handling COFF files, and LLVM wouldn't emit the correct sections (with the COFF-formatted unwind tables) when used in ELF mode. The prolog is known to be standard since Julia disables FPO

I've just started using the llvm-pdbutil tool. Great job on the general tool. But I'm having trouble figuring out how the output of the dump tool relates to real addresses in memory or for that matter relative virtual address either. Here's the logic I tried (which doesn't work): (1) Get Instruction Pointer of interest (2) Subtract the base address of the dll that address

Can we also codify when something should be added to the C API? For a lot of folks the C API is the only usable interface. I am one of them. We are not as vocally represented because don't generally give back to the community, usually because we are just consumers of this library. (Or maybe I'm totally wrong and lots of us give back). For example, ORC APIs in C the bindings. On Fri, Jul

Right, I follow your theory and thought the same. I have a single TU scenario where the global is just used because we generate hand assembly at runtime, and want to keep the code written by hand to be super simple, calls with no parameters. Our scenario is literally reading a file, which calls this functions hundreds of thousands of times, and we reset the pointer to the "global"

Lang, aren't you going to be the major (only?) player when it comes to Orc APIs, if you're not opposed to it having them in the C bindings proper will certainly help. That's my vote, I understand it is different from the previous cases but the API surface area here is relatively small. On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jauhien, >

I see it's been in the wishlist a while. Any possible timeframe for getting it working, or maybe a patch (or is it too big a change) to support it? I'm building a new server to move an existing userbase to. So far I have working: Postfix (with Maildir quota patches that work fine) Amavis-new with ClamAV scanning for viruses (will add SpamAssassin soon) SquirrelMail IMP (Horde)

Thanks, Philip. I have a sinking feeling it's not your change, but could you share the commit and so I can try it out locally? Bug: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23095 The reason I think it is not your change is because I tried a shared library build of LLVM 3.5.1 and that also failed with this error. Maybe it is because I'm using a package that makes an LLVM DLL for Windows.